How lifestyle intervention for weight loss affects birth rates in women with a high BMI

July 04, 2016

Helsinki, July 4, 2016: Women who are overweight or obese pose an ongoing challenge for the fertility clinic. Many studies show that these patients are at increased risk of infertility and are less likely than normal-weight women to conceive after fertility treatment. For example, ovulating sub-fertile women with a body mass index (BMI) of 29 kg/m2 or higher have been found in one study to have a 4% lower pregnancy rate per kg/m2 increase per year, compared to ovulatory subfertile women with a BMI below 29. Such studies suggest that weight reduction will increase the chances of conception, decrease pregnancy complications and improve perinatal outcome; however these results have not been confirmed in large randomised controlled trials.

The first major trial assessing the effect on fertility of lifestyle adjustment in obese women was published earlier this year and found that a weight-loss intervention preceding fertility treatment did not result in higher rates of healthy singleton birth within 24 months.(1) In this study -- the LIFEstyle study performed in the Netherlands - 290 women were assigned to a 6-month lifestyle-intervention programme preceding 18 months of infertility treatment (intervention group) while 287 women were assigned to prompt infertility treatment over the same 24 month study period (control group). Mean weight loss was 4.4 kg in the intervention group and 1.1 kg in the control group, but delivery rates were comparable in both groups, taking into account pregnancies conceived within but ending beyond the 24-month follow-up period. However, the rate of ongoing pregnancies following natural conception was found significantly higher in the group of women who received the lifestyle intervention than in those following fertility treatment.

Now, a sub-analysis of this LIFEstyle data confirms that the chance of delivery from fertility treatment will not be improved by weight loss in any of six subgroups studied; only the rate of natural conception was improved by peconceptional lifestyle changes.

The results are presented at ESHRE's Annual Meeting in Helsinki by Dr Anne van Oers from the University Medical Centre in Groningen, the Netherlands. The study involved 23 fertility centres in the Netherlands and was the first robust study to test the efficacy of lifestyle modification in obese subfertile women trying to get pregnant.

The analysis calculated rates of vaginal birth of a healthy singleton at term in natural and assisted reproduction conception comparing women in the intervention (lifestyle modification) group and those in the control (prompt treatment) group according to six different subgroups: these subgroups were defined by age (over or under 36 years), cycle regularity (ovulatory or anovulatory) and body weight (above or below a BMI of 35 kg/m2).

Results showed that the lifestyle intervention had no significant effect on healthy live birth rate and overall live birth rate in any of the six subgroups having fertility treatment. However, there was a significant beneficial effect of the intervention on rates of natural conception in most subgroups of women , particularly those who were anovulatory.(2) Specifically, anovulatory women who received the lifestyle intervention had a significantly higher natural conception rate than ovulatory women who received the same lifestyle intervention (28.6% vs 11.4%).

Thus, based on these results, Dr van Oers reported: "Our finding that lifestyle intervention in obese women more often leads to natural conception, specifically in anovulatory women, should be used in their counselling before fertility treatment and could reasonably be offered as first-line treatment for anovulation in obese women."

According to the LIFEstyle study's project leader, gynaecologist Dr Annemieke Hoek also from the University Medical Centre in Groningen, the Netherlands, the main study did find a slightly higher rate of live birth in those having prompt rather than delayed fertility treatment after weight loss (35% vs 27%). However, taking into account all the ongoing pregnancies conceived within the 24-month study period there were no differences between the lifestyle intervention and control groups (53% and 58%).

Dr Hoek said that only 78% of the women with obesity and infertility were able to adhere to the weight loss programme, and that their chances of getting pregnant turned out exactly the same as for those who started fertility treatment immediately.

"Despite intensive coaching," said Dr Hoek, "22% of the women were unable to maintain the six-month lifestyle programme, and they had a significantly lower chance of getting pregnant. And those who did complete the programme had a greater chance of getting pregnant naturally than the women who started fertility treatment immediately."

The greatest effect in the latter group was most evidently seen in anovulatory women, a result explained by the beneficial effect of weight loss on the resumption of ovulation.

The LIFEstyle study is the largest study of its kind in the world and the first to directly compare lifestyle intervention preceding fertility treatment with fertility treatment right away.
-end-
Abstract O-065, Monday 4 July 2016, 16.15

Is there a different effect of lifestyle intervention in subgroups of infertile obese women? Prespecified subgroup analyses of the LIFEstyle randomised controlled trial

Notes

1. Mulsaerts MA, van Oers AM, Groen H, et al. Randomized trial of a lifestyle program in obese infertile women. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1942-1953.

2. Anovulatory infertility is most commonly seen in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), the most common hormonal cause of female infertility and one often diagnosed in overweight subjects. PCOS is closely associated with other hormonal irregularities and in the longer term with metabolic abnormalities recognised as risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

The association between female body weight and reproductive performance is controversial, although most (though small) studies imply a negative effect. A review of studies published in 2007 found that women with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or more have a lower chance of pregnancy following IVF than women with a BMI 25 kg/m2 or less, require a higher dose of hormonal drugs and have an increased miscarriage rate. However, all the studies reviewed were observational and inconsistent in their definitions (Maheshwari A, Stoffberg L. Bhattacharya S. Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology -- a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 433-444). However, the review added that there is "insufficient evidence on the effect of BMI on live birth, cycle cancellation, oocyte recovery and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome".

Nevertheless, female body weight has been included in some national guidelines and some clinics adopting an upper BMI limit for access to IVF treatment.

For further information on the details of this press release, contact:

Christine Bauquis at ESHRE
Mobile: 32-0-499-25-80-46
Email: christine@eshre.eu

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Related Weight Loss Articles from Brightsurf:

Weight loss shouldn't be the goal of PE
For adults, the goal of exercise is often to shed some pounds, but new research from the University of Georgia suggests the objective should be different for kids.

How long should you fast for weight loss?
Two daily fasting diets, also known as time-restricted feeding diets, are effective for weight loss, according to a new study.

Green tea may help with weight loss efforts
In an analysis published in Phytotherapy Research of randomized controlled trials, individuals who consumed green tea experienced a significant decline in body weight and body mass index.

Changing weight-loss strategies, attempts
The proportion of adults who tried to lose weight in the previous year increased from 1999 to 2016 but the findings of this observational study suggest the results may have been unsatisfactory.

Quality of life changes after weight loss
Obesity increases a number of adverse health consequences including reduced health-related quality of life.

Weight loss medicines underutilized by veterans
Despite the availability of new weight management medications and several clinical guidelines recommending their use as part of a comprehensive treatment plan for obesity, a new study has found that their use is extremely low (about one percent) among eligible Veterans.

Is the most effective weight-loss strategy really that hard?
Dietary self-monitoring is the best predictor of weight-loss success. But the practice is viewed as so unpleasant and time-consuming, many would-be weight-losers won't adopt it.

Study: Faster weight loss no better than slow weight loss for health benefits
Losing weight slowly or quickly won't tip the scale in your favor when it comes to overall health, according to new research.

Mindfulness training may help support weight loss
Mindfulness training may improve the effectiveness of intensive weight management programs, according to a small study published in the Endocrine Society's Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Does weight loss before surgery provide benefits?
For obese and overweight patients, it is common for various surgical procedures to be deferred until they have lost weight through diet and exercise.

Read More: Weight Loss News and Weight Loss Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.