Does genomics perpetuate inequality?

July 08, 2020

Genomics is crowding out ways of reducing inequality, has thwarted medicine from advancing justice, and is creating new forms of social classification and surveillance. These are key messages of For ''All of Us''? On the Weight of Genomic Knowledge, a new Hastings Center special report.

The overarching premise of the report is that genomic "can be a weight, a weight that has the potential to thwart--and historically has thwarted--medicine from genuinely advancing justice," writes Joel Michael Reynolds, co-editor of the report with Erik Parens, a senior research scholar at The Hastings Center. The report asks if the focus on genomics is crowding out other, more effective ways of reducing health inequity. It warns that genomic knowledge can shore up scientifically discredited conceptions of race, which further entrenches structural racism. The report also warns that the danger of treating social behaviors as genetic or based on racial classifications is that this kind of logic can spur on eugenics. The report also notes that the benefits of genetic advancements will likely go to the richest in society, further exacerbating inequality.

The special report highlights several ways that genomics can perpetuate inequality and structural racism: The special report consists of 10 essays written by scholars in philosophy, social sciences, medical anthropology, and disability studies. The essays include:

Health for Whom? Bioethics and the Challenge of Justice for Genomic Medicine by Joel Michael Reynolds. In this to the special report. Reynolds writes that the report begins with the "conviction and hope that justice is at the normative heart of medicine and that it is the perpetual task of bioethics to bring concerns of justice to bear on medical practice." Summing up the special report, Reynolds writes that "taking the principle of justice seriously would lead us to better situate the gift and weight of genomics within the many practices for which we have evidence to bring about fairness and equity for human lives. To implement these practices will require not only significant biomedical efforts but also political efforts that push typical clinical and bioethical concerns beyond their historical orbit." Reynolds is an assistant professor of philosophy and disability studies at Georgetown University and the inaugural Rice Family Fellow in Bioethics and the Humanities at The Hastings Center.

Conceptualizing Race in the Genomic Age by Catherine Bliss. This essay argues that a concept of race that presumes that there are discreet genetic groups of white, black, Asian, Native American, and Pacific Islander is a fallacy that will always lead to social inequality. Bliss asks whether genomics can do more than merely avoid racism; can it contribute to antiracism projects? To promote social justice, she writes, "all of us across the sciences, throughout health policy, and in the wider public will need to reconceptualize race in terms of legacies of discrimination. We will need to shift our focus from molecular differences to social and political differences, especially when we conduct gene-environment analyses." Bliss is an associate professor of sociology at the University of California, San Francisco.

Does Solidarity Require ''All of Us'' to Participate in Genomics Research? by Carolyn P. Neuhaus. This essay interrogates the idea that Americans have an ethical obligation to participate in genomics research, as an act of solidarity, particularly the federal government's "All of Us," which aims to create precision medicine and improve the health of everyone. Neuhaus argues that while participating in research may be "a good thing to do," cultivating and expressing solidarity requires much more of us. Specifically, it requires recognizing another person or other creature "as, like ourselves, vulnerable to injustice and entails acting in ways that contribute to creating, reforming, and participating in institutions that are aimed at enhancing their flourishing." Neuhaus is a Hastings Center research scholar.

Why and How Bioethics Must Turn toward Justice: A Modest Proposal by Jenny Reardon. To create a genomics that offers more gifts than weights, Reardon argues, central attention must be paid to questions of justice and structural inequity. It will necessitate building novel coalitions and collaborations that turn the attention of bioethical governance away from narrow individual questions such as, "Do I consent?" and toward the broader collective question, is this just? Reardon is a professor of sociology and the founding director of the Science and Justice Research Center at University of California, Santa Cruz, and Hastings Center fellow.
The special report was produced under The Hastings Center's Initiative in Bioethics and the Humanities, supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities and private donors. Parens is director of the initiative. Reynolds is the initiative's inaugural Rice Family Postdoctoral Fellow in Bioethics and the Humanities at The Hastings Center.

The full special report is available here.

For more information and to interview Erik Parens, Joel Michael Reynolds, Carolyn P. Neuhaus, or any of the authors, contact:

Susan Gilbert, director of communications
The Hastings Center
845-424-4040 x244

The Hastings Center

Related Genomics Articles from Brightsurf:

Applying environmental genomics to coral conservation
Coral reefs are extremely sensitive to temperature, making them particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change.

Advancing wildlife genomics through the development of molecular methods
A team of scientists from the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (Leibniz-IZW), the Australian Museum and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) report a new method for identifying any genome sequence located next to a known sequence.

Does genomics perpetuate inequality?
A new Hastings Center special report takes a critical look at the role of genomics in perpetuating racism and inequality.

Group genomics drive aggression in honey bees
Researchers often study the genomes of individual organisms to try to tease out the relationship between genes and behavior.

Picking up threads of cotton genomics
In Nature Genetics, a multi-institutional team including researchers at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI) has now sequenced and assembled the genomes of the five major cotton lineages.

Progress in unraveling the mystery of the genomics of Parkinson's disease
The International Parkinson Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC) has now been in existence for ten years.

New database enhances genomics research collaboration
Sharing datasets that reveal the function of genomic variants in health and disease has become easier, with the launch of a new, open-source database developed by Australian and North American researchers.

Speeding up single-cell genomics research
Time-saving method makes it possible to profile gene regulation in tens of thousands of individual human cells in a single day.

A new vision for genomics in animal agriculture
Iowa State University animal scientists helped to form a blueprint to guide the next decade of animal genomics research.

Genomics provide hope for those with 'one in a million' cancer diagnosis
New research has shown that many people with rare cancers can benefit from genomic profiling.

Read More: Genomics News and Genomics Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to