Scientists find similar survival rates for eye cancer therapies

July 12, 2001

Researchers have found that the survival rates for two alternative treatments for primary eye cancer -- radiation therapy and removal of the eye -- are about the same. Prior to this finding, there was a question in the medical community as to whether either treatment might result in lower mortality. Also, as a consequence of this research, the capability of doctors nationwide to provide more accurate diagnoses and state-of-the-art treatments for eye cancer has been greatly expanded. Mortality data are compared in the July 2001 issue of Archives of Ophthalmology.

"These findings are reassuring to patients with medium-sized eye tumors who have to choose between the option of radiation therapy vs. removal of the eye," said Paul A. Sieving, M.D., Ph.D., director of the National Eye Institute (NEI). "Patients now know that their choice will not impact their survival. Equally important, more information is now available about how each treatment will affect a patient's life, so patients and their doctors can make informed treatment decisions."

The clinical trial -- called the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) -- was supported by the NEI and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), components of the Federal government's National Institutes of Health.

"The COMS findings are a striking example of the role that clinical trials play in improving patient care," said Richard Klausner, M.D., director of the NCI. "Without this important trial, patients would not have known that they have a choice between radiation and surgery for treatment of their ocular melanoma, with the same opportunity for long-term survival."

With the data showing similar survival rates for radiation therapy vs. removal of the eye, quality of life issues become important factors when deciding which of the two treatment options is better for the individual patient.

"Most patients who received the radiation therapy had some vision loss, and some eyes receiving radiation therapy were later removed because of tumor regrowth or other complications," said Stuart Fine, M.D., chairman of the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia and chair of the COMS clinical trial. "However, many people diagnosed with primary eye cancer may consider these problems worth risking in comparison to immediate loss of the eye.

"COMS researchers have initiated a parallel study to assess the quality of life for patients enrolled in this clinical trial," Dr. Fine said. "The findings of this study -- when released in a few years -- should provide more information on which to base a treatment decision."

For more than a century, removal of the eye has been the standard treatment for primary eye cancer, also known as ocular melanoma. During the past 25 years, interest in radiation therapy has increased because of the potential for saving the eye -- and with it, some vision.

In the COMS, patients with medium-sized tumors were studied in a randomized clinical trial to determine which of two treatments -- radiation therapy or removal of the eye -- is more likely to prolong survival.

The affected eyes of one group received a form of radiation therapy called I-125 brachytherapy (pronounced BRAK-e-ther-a-pe), in which a small plaque containing radioactive iodine pellets is placed over the tumor.

The other group had the eye removed. Approximately one-third of the patients have been followed for 10 years; over 80 percent were followed for five years. Researchers found that the survival rates were essentially the same in the two groups.

In the COMS clinical trial, researchers also found that the five-year survival rate of patients who were treated with either radiation therapy or eye removal was 82 percent, considerably better than the 70 percent five-year survival rate that had been projected when the study was designed in 1985. Moreover, there is no evidence that either treatment causes harm to the other eye. All patients in the study will continue to be followed for up to 15 years.

The type of eye cancer studied by COMS researchers is choroidal melanoma, a tumor of the eye that arises from pigmented cells of the choroid, a layer of tissue in the back of the eye. Although it is rare, choroidal melanoma is the most common primary eye cancer in adults. These tumors enlarge over time and may lead to vision loss. More importantly, these tumors can spread, or metastasize, to other parts of the body; once metastasis is clinically detected, death typically occurs within months.

Because there is no cure for metastatic melanoma, treatment is aimed at keeping the cancer confined to the eye. Researchers estimate that between 1600 and 2400 new cases of ocular melanoma are diagnosed annually in the United States and Canada, a rate of about six-to-eight new cases per million people each year. Choroidal melanoma is much more common in whites of northern European descent.

In June 1998, in a separate but related COMS clinical trial, researchers released results concerning whether a type of preoperative radiation therapy, called external beam radiation, prolonged life for patients whose ocular melanoma tumors were so large that removal of the eye was a medical necessity.

Researchers reported that patients had similar survival rates regardless of whether their eyes were treated with external beam radiation prior to removal of the eye, or had their eyes removed without prior radiation therapy.

The COMS trials were conducted at 43 institutions, including medical schools, hospitals, and doctors' offices, throughout the United States and Canada. A list of current study centers and principal investigators is attached.

# # #


The National Eye Institute (NEI) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) are both part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NEI is the Federal government's lead agency for vision research that leads to sight-saving treatments and plays a key role in reducing visual impairment and blindness. The NCI is the Federal government's primary agency for cancer research. The NIH is an agency of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Background

The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) Randomized Trial of I-125 Brachytherapy for Medium Choroidal Melanoma

Choroidal melanoma is a tumor of the eye that forms from pigmented cells of the choroid, a layer of vascular tissue in the back of the eye. These tumors enlarge over time and can lead to loss of vision. Melanoma cells also can spread to other parts of the body and may cause death. Although it is a rare cancer, choroidal melanoma is the most common primary eye cancer in adults.

Choroidal melanoma may produce symptoms of blurry vision. However, there are often no symptoms in the disease's early stages, and the cancer may grow before the problem becomes noticeable. Choroidal melanoma is usually detected during a dilated eye exam, when an eye care professional dilates the pupils and examines the back of the eye.

Since the late 19th century, removal of the eye has been the standard treatment for choroidal melanoma of all sizes; radiation has been used experimentally to treat choroidal melanoma since World War II. During the past 20 years, interest in different methods of radiation therapy has increased because of the potential for saving eyes with small to medium-sized tumors.

However, many in the medical community questioned whether patients treated with eye-conserving radiation therapy experienced higher death rates than those whose eyes were removed. Researchers concluded that the only way to determine this conclusively was to conduct a clinical trial in which a large number of choroidal melanoma patients would randomly receive the two different treatments and be followed for many years. The survival rates of the two treatments could then be compared.

The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS)

The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) includes two separate, long-term, multicenter, randomized controlled trials that compare treatments with respect to survival rates of patients with choroidal melanoma.

The two COMS clinical trials are:

The Randomized Trial of I-125 Brachytherapy for Medium Choroidal Melanoma

Patient enrollment in the COMS' Randomized Trial of I-125 Brachytherapy for Medium Choroidal Melanoma began in February 1987 and was completed in July 1998. To be eligible for this trial, a patient had to have choroidal melanoma from 2.5 to 10.0 mm in apical height and no more than 16.0 mm in longest basal diameter. Eligible patients were at least 21 years old, had no other primary tumor, and had no other disease that threatened their lives within the next five years. Previous treatment related to the eye cancer rendered a patient ineligible. Eligible patients enrolled and received treatment at 43 clinical centers located in major population areas of the United States and Canada.

The study enrolled 1317 patients with medium-sized choroidal melanoma. About 98 percent were non-Hispanic whites. The group was evenly divided by gender, and the mean age was approximately 60 years. Patients were assigned to one of two treatment groups by randomization. One group -- 660 patients -- was assigned to have the affected eye removed. The other group -- 657 patients -- was assigned to radiation treatment.

The radiation treatment was delivered via an iodine-125 episcleral plaque. Prior to the treatment, the dimensions of the tumor were measured. A gold plaque with a plastic seed carrier containing the proper dosage and configuration of radioactive iodine seeds was sutured to the outside of the eye over the base of the tumor. This procedure delivered a high dose of radiation to the tumor. The plaque typically was removed from the eye after three-to-five days.

COMS Clinical Trial Current Principal Investigators & Study Centers

Arizona

Leonard Joffe, M.D.
Retina Associates Southwest
Tucson, AZ

California

Bradley R. Straatsma, M.D.
Jules Stein Eye Institute
University of California at Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA

A. Linn Murphree, M.D.
Estelle Doheny Eye Foundation
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA

Man M. Singh Hayreh, M.D.
Southern California Permanente Group
Panorama City, CA

Robert N. Johnson, M.D.
Schatz, McDonald, Johnson, and Ai
San Francisco, CA

Colorado

Kenneth R. Hovland, M.D.
Adventist Hospital
Denver, CO

Florida

Timothy G. Murray, M.D.
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
University of Miami School of Medicine
Miami, FL

W. Sanderson Grizzard, M.D.
Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.
South Tampa Medical Center
Tampa, FL

Georgia

Paul Sternberg, Jr., M.D.
Emory Eye Center
Emory University
Atlanta, GA

James H. Frank, M.D.
Piedmont Hospital
Eye Consultants of Atlanta, P.C.
Atlanta, GA

Illinois

Lee M. Jampol, M.D.
Northwestern University Medical School
Chicago, IL

Norman P. Blair, M.D.
University of Illinois
Chicago, IL

Indiana

John T. Minturn, M.D.
Midwest Eye Institute
Indianapolis, IN

Iowa

Thomas A. Weingeist, M.D., Ph.D.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, IA

Louisiana

Gerald Cohen, M.D.
Touro Infirmary
New Orleans, LA


Maryland

Andrew P. Schachat, M.D.
The Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Baltimore, MD

Massachusetts

Clement L. Trempe, M.D.
Schepens Retina Associates
Boston, MA

Michigan

Andrew K. Vine, M.D.
W. K. Kellogg Eye Center
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI

Antonio Capone, M.D.
Associated Retinal Consultants, P.C.
Royal Oak, MI

Minnesota

Dennis M. Robertson, M.D.
Mayo Foundation
Rochester, MN

Missouri

J. William Harbour, M.D.
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO

New York

David H. Abramson, M.D.
Cornell University Medical Center

Paul T. Finger, M.D.
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
New York, NY and North Shore University Hospital
Great Neck, NY

North Carolina

Jonathan J. Dutton, M.D., Ph.D.
Atlantic Eye and Face Center
Cary, NC

Ohio Z. Nicholas Zakov, M.D.
Retina Associates of Cleveland/Case Western Reserve University
Beachwood, OH

Froncie A. Gutman, M.D.
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, OH


Frederick H. Davidorf, M.D. Ohio State University College of Medicine
Columbus, OH


Oklahoma

Reagan H. Bradford, Jr. M.D.
Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
Oklahoma City, OK


Oregon

David J. Wilson, M.D.
Casey Eye Institute
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, OR


Pennsylvania

Karl R. Olsen, M.D.
Retina-Vitreous Consultants
Pittsburgh, PA

Texas

Dwain G. Fuller, M.D.
Texas Retina Associates
Dallas, TX

Richard S. Ruiz, M.D.
Hermann Eye Center
Houston, TX

Wichard A. Van Heuven, M.D.
University of Texas
Health Science Center
San Antonio, TX

J. Paul Dieckert, M.D.
Scott and White Memorial Hospital
Temple, TX

Virginia

Brian P. Conway, M.D.
University of Virginia
Health Sciences Center
Charlottesville, VA

Washington

Edward B. McLean, M.D.
Ophthalmic Consultants Northwest, Inc.
Seattle, WA

Craig G. Wells, M.D. University of Washington
School of Medicine
Seattle, WA

Wisconsin

Suresh R. Chandra, M.D.
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI

Judith E. Kim, M.D.
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, WI

Canada

E. Rand Simpson, M.D.
Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess
Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Christina Corriveau, M.D.
Notre Dame Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Resource Centers

Chairman's Office
Stuart L. Fine, M.D.
Scheie Eye Institute
University of Pennsylvania
51 North 39th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Telephone: 215-662-9679

Coordinating Center

Barbara S. Hawkins, Ph.D.
Clinical Trials and Biometry Division
The Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Baltimore, MD 21205-2010
Telephone: 410-955-8943

Echography Center

Sandra Byrne
Mars Hill College
Mars Hill, NC

Pathology Center Daniel M. Albert, M.D.
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI

Photograph Reading Center
H. Culver Boldt, M.D.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, IA

Radiological Physics Center
William F. Hanson, Ph.D.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX

NEI Representative
Natalie Kurinij, Ph.D.
National Eye Institute
National Institutes of Health
Rockville, MD

Contact: National Eye Institute, 301-496-5248, mjc@nei.nih.gov.

NIH/National Eye Institute

Related Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

New blood cancer treatment works by selectively interfering with cancer cell signalling
University of Alberta scientists have identified the mechanism of action behind a new type of precision cancer drug for blood cancers that is set for human trials, according to research published in Nature Communications.

UCI researchers uncover cancer cell vulnerabilities; may lead to better cancer therapies
A new University of California, Irvine-led study reveals a protein responsible for genetic changes resulting in a variety of cancers, may also be the key to more effective, targeted cancer therapy.

Breast cancer treatment costs highest among young women with metastic cancer
In a fight for their lives, young women, age 18-44, spend double the amount of older women to survive metastatic breast cancer, according to a large statewide study by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.

Stress in cervical cancer patients associated with higher risk of cancer-specific mortality
Psychological stress was associated with a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality in women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.

Moffitt Cancer Center researchers identify one way T cell function may fail in cancer
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers have discovered a mechanism by which one type of immune cell, CD8+ T cells, can become dysfunctional, impeding its ability to seek and kill cancer cells.

More cancer survivors, fewer cancer specialists point to challenge in meeting care needs
An aging population, a growing number of cancer survivors, and a projected shortage of cancer care providers will result in a challenge in delivering the care for cancer survivors in the United States if systemic changes are not made.

New cancer vaccine platform a potential tool for efficacious targeted cancer therapy
Researchers at the University of Helsinki have discovered a solution in the form of a cancer vaccine platform for improving the efficacy of oncolytic viruses used in cancer treatment.

American Cancer Society outlines blueprint for cancer control in the 21st century
The American Cancer Society is outlining its vision for cancer control in the decades ahead in a series of articles that forms the basis of a national cancer control plan.

Read More: Cancer News and Cancer Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.