Study questions mortality benefit of breast cancer screening in community settings

July 19, 2005

A new study calls into question the actual benefits of breast cancer screenings as practiced in the real world, as opposed to the well-controlled situations of previous screening trials. The study appears in the July 20 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

During the past two decades, many organizations have recommended regular breast cancer screenings for women, leading to the widespread adoption of mammography and clinical breast examination screenings. However, the basis of these recommendations comes from data produced in carefully controlled research studies. Thus, controversy has arisen concerning the true benefit of mammography in real-world situations.

To address this question, Joann G. Elmore, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Washington in Seattle, and colleagues reviewed the medical records of 1,351 ethnically diverse women from around the United States who had died from breast cancer between 1983 and 1998. They compared this information to data from a control group of 2,501 cancer-free women, matched for age and risk factors (e.g., family history). If screening for breast cancer really does prevent women from dying of the disease, the women still living would have had more screenings, the authors reasoned.

However, they found very similar screening rates among the groups. For example, 69.7% of the cancer patients aged 50-65 years with an average risk of developing the disease had gotten mammograms and/or breast examinations by a clinician, compared with 69.2% of the cancer-free women of similar age and risk.

Among women with an increased risk of the disease, the authors did see a 26% reduction in breast cancer mortality associated with screenings, but this was not statistically significant. "We observed no appreciable association between breast cancer mortality and screening history," regardless of age or risk-level, the authors ultimately concluded.

Because older carefully controlled breast cancer screening trials suggested that periodic screenings may reduce breast cancer mortality, the authors suggest several reasons for the discrepancy between their results and prior studies, and they urge caution when interpreting their study's results. For example, the authors could only gain limited amounts of information from clinical records and retrospective data. However, the quality of community screening may not be the same as that of a research trial, and the development of new life-saving treatments for breast cancer may have improved survival rates regardless of screening history, the authors point out.

In an accompanying editorial, Russell Harris, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, suggests that issues that may reduce the effectiveness of formal screenings in real-life situations include problems with implementing screening programs in real-world communities and recent improvements in the detection and treatment for breast cancer patients. Also, the fact that many women are now seeking medical care for small lumps found in self-examinations may make screening less useful than it once was. "We need to recognize when issues of implementation ... are limiting the effectiveness of our interventions. And we need to recognize when ... a previously effective intervention (is) no longer useful," he concludes.
  • Article: Susan Gregg-Hanson, Communications Office, University of Washington,
  • Editorial: David Williamson, University of North Carolina, 919-962-8596,

  • Article: Elmore JG, Reisch LM, Barton MB, Barlow WE, Rolnick S, Harris EL, et al., Efficacy of Breast Cancer Screening in the Community According to Risk Level. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1035-43.
  • Editorial: Harris R, Effectiveness: The Next Question for Breast Cancer Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2995;97:1021-23.

    Note: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is published by Oxford University Press and is not affiliated with the National Cancer Institute. Attribution to the Journal of the National Cancer Institute is requested in all news coverage. Visit the Journal online at

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute

    Related Breast Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

    Oncotarget: IGF2 expression in breast cancer tumors and in breast cancer cells
    The Oncotarget authors propose that methylation of DVDMR represents a novel epigenetic biomarker that determines the levels of IGF2 protein expression in breast cancer.

    Breast cancer: AI predicts which pre-malignant breast lesions will progress to advanced cancer
    New research at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, could help better determine which patients diagnosed with the pre-malignant breast cancer commonly as stage 0 are likely to progress to invasive breast cancer and therefore might benefit from additional therapy over and above surgery alone.

    Partial breast irradiation effective treatment option for low-risk breast cancer
    Partial breast irradiation produces similar long-term survival rates and risk for recurrence compared with whole breast irradiation for many women with low-risk, early stage breast cancer, according to new clinical data from a national clinical trial involving researchers from The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G.

    Breast screening linked to 60 per cent lower risk of breast cancer death in first 10 years
    Women who take part in breast screening have a significantly greater benefit from treatments than those who are not screened, according to a study of more than 50,000 women.

    More clues revealed in link between normal breast changes and invasive breast cancer
    A research team, led by investigators from Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, details how a natural and dramatic process -- changes in mammary glands to accommodate breastfeeding -- uses a molecular process believed to contribute to survival of pre-malignant breast cells.

    Breast tissue tumor suppressor PTEN: A potential Achilles heel for breast cancer cells
    A highly collaborative team of researchers at the Medical University of South Carolina and Ohio State University report in Nature Communications that they have identified a novel pathway for connective tissue PTEN in breast cancer cell response to radiotherapy.

    Computers equal radiologists in assessing breast density and associated breast cancer risk
    Automated breast-density evaluation was just as accurate in predicting women's risk of breast cancer, found and not found by mammography, as subjective evaluation done by radiologists, in a study led by researchers at UC San Francisco and Mayo Clinic.

    Blood test can effectively rule out breast cancer, regardless of breast density
    A new study published in PLOS ONE demonstrates that Videssa® Breast, a multi-protein biomarker blood test for breast cancer, is unaffected by breast density and can reliably rule out breast cancer in women with both dense and non-dense breast tissue.

    Study shows influence of surgeons on likelihood of removal of healthy breast after breast cancer dia
    Attending surgeons can have a strong influence on whether a patient undergoes contralateral prophylactic mastectomy after a diagnosis of breast cancer, according to a study published by JAMA Surgery.

    Young breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery see improved prognosis
    A new analysis indicates that breast cancer prognoses have improved over time in young women treated with breast conserving surgery.

    Read More: Breast Cancer News and Breast Cancer Current Events
  • is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to