Nav: Home

The great NFL practice conundrum: How much should you train to avoid injury?

July 22, 2018

It seems like the most banal advice you could give an athlete: don't overtrain. And yet, when the National Football League (NFL) and the NFL Players Association agreed, as part of their collective bargaining agreement (CBA) in 2011, to practice restrictions--ostensibly to cut down on injuries--controversy erupted.

The rules, which notably limited full-padded practice to once per day during off season and to a total of 14 during the regular season, would change the way the game was played, critics warned--and to its detriment.

As ESPN Monday Night Football analyst and former NFL head coach Jon Gruden explained, "The less time we spend meeting, the less time we spend practicing, the less time we spend together practicing like we're going to play on game day, the less we're going to execute, the less we're going to be disciplined and the less we're going to perform."

But the most hard-hitting criticism of all came from New England Patriots Coach Bill Belichick: far from preventing injuries, he believed the rules encouraged them. "You have a gap between preparation and competition level," he told the Associated Press. "And I think that's where you see a lot of injuries occurring. We get a lot of breakdowns. We get a lot of situations that players just aren't as prepared as they were in previous years, in my experience anyway."

Zachary Binney had devoted his entire PhD dissertation to analyzing injuries in the NFL. A "sports nut" (his father had been the statistician for the Atlanta Braves), Binney accidentally got into sports injuries after beginning freelance analytics work for the Jacksonville Jaguars. "They saw I was an epidemiologist and assumed I'd know all about sports injuries; I didn't at the time, frankly, but I found the topic fascinating." He's now been studying the field for five years, received his PhD this year, and presently consults for a number of sports teams.

Belichick's claim simply begged for statistical analysis.

"He was proposing a classic case of unintended consequences, where if you don't practice enough--if you're undertraining--you're not getting those muscles and tendons and ligaments strong enough to survive the rigors of an NFL season," says Binney. "I wanted to take a look at what actually happened over time in the NFL. Did injuries go up after those practice restrictions came about?"

Binney, along with other researchers from Emory's Rollins School of Public Health, looked at data from 2007 to 2016: ten NFL seasons that amounted to roughly 20 thousand player seasons and 7,425 injuries. "We looked to see if there were any sudden changes in the years before 2011 versus after 2011, while adjusting for the fact that more attention has been paid to NFL injuries over time, which means the number of reported injuries had been going up even before the new CBA."

"What I often think as the genius of statistics is to be able to model whether subtle changes are going on," says Binney. "It's not simply a question of measuring before and after and then drawing a conclusion." What would prove Belichick right was that the increase in injuries went faster after the new restrictions took effect. "And in a nutshell, we found that they didn't," says Binney. "They didn't seem to go up or down on balance."

"We also looked to see if there were changes in hamstring, calf, and quadriceps injuries versus broken arms or legs or things that have nothing to do with how in-shape a player is; it's just a guy landed on you wrong. We didn't see any differences in any of those subgroups, either."

Did the NFL make the right call? "They didn't make the wrong call," says Binney, "But there's a lot we don't know. Are players still overtraining? We don't know. Are players optimally training now? We don't know. Were they undertraining before and they're still undertraining now? We don't know. What we know is that they didn't do, on average, what Bill Belichick and others were afraid they did."

How has Belichick reacted to the news? "We don't know," says Binney, "perhaps someone will ask him!"
-end-
More info: https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2018/fewer-practices-does-not-mean-more-injuries

JSM Talk: http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2018/onlineprogram/ActivityDetails.cfm?SessionID=215809

Study link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.01271.pdf

For further details, contact: Zachary Binney

Email: zachary.orion.binney@emory.edu

About JSM 2018

JSM 2018 is the largest gathering of statisticians and data scientists in the world, taking place July 28-August 2, 2018, in Vancouver. Occurring annually since 1974, JSM is a joint effort of the American Statistical Association, International Biometric Society (ENAR and WNAR), Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Statistical Society of Canada, International Chinese Statistical Association, International Indian Statistical Association, Korean International Statistical Society, International Society for Bayesian Analysis, Royal Statistical Society and International Statistical Institute. JSM activities include oral presentations, panel sessions, poster presentations, professional development courses, an exhibit hall, a career service, society and section business meetings, committee meetings, social activities and networking opportunities. http://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2018/index.cfm

About the American Statistical Association

The ASA is the world's largest community of statisticians and the oldest continuously operating professional science society in the United States. Its members serve in industry, government and academia in more than 90 countries, advancing research and promoting sound statistical practice to inform public policy and improve human welfare. For additional information, please visit the ASA website at http://www.amstat.org.

American Statistical Association

Related Public Health Articles:

The Lancet Public Health: Ageism linked to poorer health in older people in England
Ageism may be linked with poorer health in older people in England, according to an observational study of over 7,500 people aged over 50 published in The Lancet Public Health journal.
Study: Public transportation use linked to better public health
Promoting robust public transportation systems may come with a bonus for public health -- lower obesity rates.
Bloomberg American Health Initiative releases special public health reports supplement
With US life expectancy now on the decline for two consecutive years, the Bloomberg American Health Initiative is releasing a supplement to Public Health Reports, the scholarly journal of the US Surgeon General.
Data does the heavy lifting: Encouraging new public health approaches to promote the health benefits of muscle-strengthening exercise (MSE)
According to a new study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, almost 75 percent of US adults do not comply with public health guidelines recommending two or more muscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) sessions a week, with nearly 60 percent of the population doing no MSE at all.
The Lancet Public Health: Moderate carbohydrate intake may be best for health
Low-carb diets that replace carbohydrates with proteins and fats from plant sources associated with lower risk of mortality compared to those that replace carbohydrates with proteins and fat from animal sources.
More Public Health News and Public Health Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...