Nav: Home

Researchers report unraveling the immune recognition of nucleic acid nanoparticles

July 26, 2018

An extensive experiment testing the immune effects of a broad group of lab-designed nucleic acid nanoparticles did not find a strong, uniform immune response, as had been predicted. Instead, the tests found varying and specific responses from different immune cells, depending on each particle's shape and formulation, a finding that may encourage further study of the particles' therapeutic use.

In addition, the researchers believe that they may have discovered an "auxiliary" system for managing immune response -- a molecular "alphabet" for communicating with the human immune system.

The findings were recently reported by Enping Hong, Ankit Shah, and Marina Dobrovolskaia of the Frederick Laboratory for Cancer Research, Emil Khisamutdinov of Ball State University and Justin Halman and Kirill Afonin of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the journal Nano Letters.

The idea has been around for a while that selected segments of RNA or DNA could be used therapeutically - "therapeutic nucleic acids" - to affect gene or cell function. Unfortunately, in clinical trials most of these proposed therapeutic molecules have proved to have an extreme side effect - they provoked a strong, often fatal reaction from the human body's immune cells.

More recently, nanotechnologists have proposed designing self-assembling nanoparticles with the potentially therapeutic RNA or DNA sequences, combining the effects of several sequences into a targeted drug, giving multiple effects in a single particle, shaped into various designer forms - squares, triangles, cubes, and other structures. These potentially powerful therapeutic particles have been slow to be tested however, because researchers have theorized that they were likely to have the same "immunotoxic" effects as the natural nucleic acid fragments.

However, some nanoscientists questioned whether the projected immune reactions would necessarily be the case because of the complexities of immune system recognition and unique properties created by assembling traditional materials into nanoparticles of various shapes and structures.

"Even if nucleic acid nanoparticles are composed of components with known immunological toxicities, once you combine them and reformulate them, the nanoformulation becomes a completely different beast," said Afonin, one of the paper's corresponding authors.

"Our findings showed that, while some of the predictions were correct, many were completely wrong," noted Afonin. "You can't predict the immunotoxicity of nucleic acid nanoparticles purely by analyzing the responses to naturally produced DNAs and RNAs. We came up with some unexpected results."

To test the immunotoxicity of the particles and perhaps find clues for the mechanisms involved in immune cell response, Afonin and his colleagues selected a "library" of 25 different DNA or RNA nucleic acid nanoparticles designed by researchers in the field, carefully picked to "address all possible links" between their molecular properties and immune reactions. The library included a representative sampling of planar (flat), globular and fibrous (string-like) particles, with different sizes and molecular weights, as well as differing in a variety of critical chemical attributes. The particles were introduced to immune cells (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) from the blood of 60 unique human donors and monitored for the production of 29 different cytokines.

The details of the findings were revealing regarding the immunotoxicity of the particles because the immune response varied. But the results also revealed information regarding specific behavior of various immune cells.

A fundamental finding was that "naked" nucleic acid nanoparticles (unattached to other biological molecules) caused no immune response at all - because, the team found, unlike naturally occurring fragments of DNA or RNA, the constructed particles could not enter any immune cell without some kind of "carrier" molecules that allowed their entry. Effectively, plain nucleic acid nanoparticles are "invisible" to the human immune system.

Once the particles were paired with a carrier molecules, however, they were able to enter the cells, and elicited clear responses, as the researchers hoped. "The question is when we send this particle inside the human cell, what does the cell, particularly the immune cell, do?" Afonin wondered. "Does it see a particular shape as a threat?"

The results show that particle size, shape, 3-D structure (cubes, for example, compared with planar squares), DNA or RNA composition, and the chemical nature of how the particles were assembled ("connectivity") all had distinctive effects on immune response and on which immune cells responded.

Among the details uncovered was the finding that particles composed of DNA tended to cause less immune response than those of RNA. RNA rings (flat structures) and RNA fibers caused less immune response than RNA cubes (globular structures). In further detail, DNA cubes induced the cytokine production of type I interferons alpha and omega, but only RNA cubes could induce type I interferon-beta or type III interferon-lambda. The different cytokines produced indicated that the differences in particles had a selective effect on that type of immune cell affected.

While the findings are scientifically important, the researchers stress that the new information has implications for future practical applications.

"Our findings highlight the key parameters that inform the way nucleic acid nanoparticles interact with the immune system," the paper states. "These new insights improve the current understanding nucleic acid nanoparticles immunostimulatory properties, and pave the way to development of a new auxiliary molecular language that can be expressed through the script of rationally designed nucleic acid nanoparticles."

"We have an alphabet to directly communicate with the immune system," said Afonin. "Now we have to figure out the syntax of this new language; how to assemble these letters into the words, put sentences together, combine them into the paragraphs, and eventually, how to write a story. But right now we have an alphabet - it's just the beginning, but I think this is fundamental work."

Afonin points out that an "alphabet" that describes immune response to specific particle designs may naturally be useful for avoiding adverse reactions, but has more potential for situations where a response is actually desired (in the case of vaccines, for example) and has still more possibilities when treatment requires specific messaging to trigger a very specific immune response.

"If you need to deliver a drug, you may want the carrier to be non-immunogenic. We can tell you exactly which particle you can use for that," he said. "But if you want to stimulate the immune response, for example to activate the immune system against cancer... then you can use certain particles which will activate the immune response but avoid inflammation. We can produce interferons, but not inflammatory cytokines, for example.

"This is like sharpshooting," he explained. "You will be shooting for a particular cytokine, without touching others. This is like a letter or a word, like a text message that we send to the immune system. The immune system will read your message and text back with the interferon."
The paper is available online at The study was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, contract number HHSN261200800001E and National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, award number R01GM120487.

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Related Immune System Articles:

Using the immune system as a defence against cancer
Research published today in the British Journal of Cancer has found that a naturally occurring molecule and a component of the immune system that can successfully target and kill cancer cells, can also encourage immunity against cancer resurgence.
First impressions go a long way in the immune system
An algorithm that predicts the immune response to a pathogen could lead to early diagnosis for such diseases as tuberculosis
Filming how our immune system kill bacteria
To kill bacteria in the blood, our immune system relies on nanomachines that can open deadly holes in their targets.
Putting the break on our immune system's response
Researchers have discovered how a tiny molecule known as miR-132 acts as a 'handbrake' on our immune system -- helping us fight infection.
Decoding the human immune system
For the first time ever, researchers are comprehensively sequencing the human immune system, which is billions of times larger than the human genome.
Masterswitch discovered in body's immune system
Scientists have discovered a critical part of the body's immune system with potentially major implications for the treatment of some of the most devastating diseases affecting humans.
How a fungus can cripple the immune system
An international research team led by Professor Oliver Werz of Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, has now discovered how the fungus knocks out the immune defenses, enabling a potentially fatal fungal infection to develop.
How the immune system protects us against bowel cancer
Researchers from Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin have discovered a protective mechanism which is used by the body to protect intestinal stem cells from turning cancerous.
How herpesviruses shape the immune system
DZIF scientists at the Helmholtz Zentrum München have developed an analytic method that can very precisely detect viral infections using immune responses.
The immune system's fountain of youth
Helping the immune system clear away old cells in aging mice helped restore youthful characteristics.
More Immune System News and Immune System Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#538 Nobels and Astrophysics
This week we start with this year's physics Nobel Prize awarded to Jim Peebles, Michel Mayor, and Didier Queloz and finish with a discussion of the Nobel Prizes as a way to award and highlight important science. Are they still relevant? When science breakthroughs are built on the backs of hundreds -- and sometimes thousands -- of people's hard work, how do you pick just three to highlight? Join host Rachelle Saunders and astrophysicist, author, and science communicator Ethan Siegel for their chat about astrophysics and Nobel Prizes.