Nav: Home

ACMG releases updated position statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for detection of fetal aneuploidy

July 28, 2016

Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free placental DNA circulating in maternal blood (NIPS) has been rapidly integrated into prenatal care since the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) released its 2013 Position Statement on its use. "New data and provider and patient demand required an updated ACMG position on the use of NIPS in prenatal care," said lead author of the ACMG statement and high-risk pregnancy physician, Anthony R. Gregg, MD, MBA, FACOG, FACMG. "We provide a framework for understanding how genetic technology moves from an idea into clinical practice. ACMG continues to stress that NIPS is a screening rather than a diagnostic test and positive results should be followed by a diagnostic test such as chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis."(Diagnostic tests eliminate the problem of false positive and false negative results associated with a screening test).

The updated statement, "Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics," will be published in the ACMG's peer-reviewed academic journal, Genetics in Medicine online Ahead of Print (AOP) Thursday, July 28, 2016.

The ACMG statement focuses on topics that obstetric care providers and patients should discuss when considering prenatal aneuploidy screening options. It includes 44 specific recommendations for providers and the laboratories that offer NIPS. One goal is to ensure patients receive accurate and up-to-date information. Another goal is to ensure obstetric care providers have clear, precise and accurate laboratory reports as well as educational tools and resources in order to counsel patients.

Key questions and recommendations include:

  1. Should NIPS be offered to all pregnant patients?
    • ACMG recommends:
      • informing all pregnant women that NIPS is the most sensitive screening option for traditionally screened aneuploidies involving chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 (i.e., Patau, Edwards and Down syndrome).
  2. How are "no calls" avoided, interpreted and managed?
    ("No call" is the technical term reported when the laboratory is unable to obtain a NIPS result; it is most commonly due to insufficient fetal cell-free DNA in the sample).
    • ACMG recommends
      • offering diagnostic testing for a "no call" NIPS result due to low fetal fraction if maternal blood for NIPS was drawn at an appropriate gestational age. A repeat blood draw is NOT appropriate.
      • offering aneuploidy screening other than NIPS in cases of significant obesity.
  3. Should NIPS be offered to screen for sex chromosome aneuploidies?
    • ACMG recommends
      • informing all pregnant women as part of pre-test counseling for NIPS, of the availability of the expanded use of screening for sex chromosome aneuploidies.
      • providers should make efforts to deter patients from selecting sex chromosome aneuploidy screening for the sole purpose of biologic sex identification, in the absence of a clinical indication for this information.
  4. Should NIPS be offered for detection of copy number variation (CNV)?
    • ACMG recommends
      • informing all pregnant women of the availability of the expanded use of NIPS to screen for clinically relevant CNVs when specific conditions can also be met.

The position statement offers guidance to obstetric care providers and makes the following specific recommendations:
  • referring patients to a trained genetics professional for any positive NIPS result.
  • offering diagnostic testing for a positive NIPS result.
  • providing accurate, balanced, up-to-date information, at an appropriate literacy level when a fetus is diagnosed with a condition after prenatal screening and confirmatory diagnostic testing. These materials should reflect the medical and psychosocial implications of the diagnosis (see Patient and Provider Resources).
  • informing patients of the possibility of identifying maternal genomic imbalances which could potentially impact maternal health, and that this possibility depends on the specific methodology used.

Some of the recommendations for laboratories that perform NIPS include that:
  • laboratories provide readily visible and clearly stated detection rate (DR), specificity (SPEC), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for all conditions being screened, in pre-test marketing materials and when reporting laboratory results, in order to assist patients and providers in decision-making and results interpretation.
  • laboratories should not offer screening for any condition for which it is unable to report the DR, SPEC, PPV and NPV.
  • all laboratories include a clearly visible fetal fraction on NIPS reports.
  • all laboratories specify the reason for a "no call" when reporting NIPS results.
  • laboratories work with public health officials, policymakers, and private payers to make NIPS, including the pre- and post-test education and counseling, accessible to all pregnant women.
ACMG Executive Director, Michael S. Watson, PhD, FACMG, another author of the new ACMG statement and member of The Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Work Group of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics added, "Ultimately, we believe that a patient, with guidance from her provider, should be able to make an informed decision on the current use of prenatal screening options including NIPS and understand the ramifications of a positive, negative or "no call" result."

The ACMG statement also stresses the importance of patient counseling before and after testing, and it provides a list of patient resources and useful references for medical providers.
About the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics is the specialty society representing U.S. clinical and laboratory Medical Geneticists who are board certified by the American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics, one of the 24 primary member specialty boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties. Fellows of ACMG are from four specialties: MD/DO Clinical Genetics and three MD or PhD laboratory specialties (Clinical Biochemical Genetics, Clinical Cytogenetics, and Clinical Molecular Genetics). ACMG's 2000 members also include genetic counselors, genetics nurses, and public health geneticists. Founded in 1991, ACMG is the only nationally recognized medical organization dedicated to improving health through the practice of medical genetics and genomics.

Three guiding pillars underpin ACMG's work: 1) Clinical and Laboratory Practice: Establish the paradigm of genomic medicine by issuing statements and evidence-based or expert clinical and laboratory practice guidelines and through descriptions of best practices for the delivery of genomic medicine. 2) Education: Provide education and tools for medical geneticists, other health professionals and the public and grow the genetics workforce. 3) Advocacy: Work with policymakers and payers to support the responsible application of genomics in medical practice. Genetics in Medicine, published monthly, is the official ACMG peer-reviewed journal. ACMG's website offers a variety of resources including Policy and Position Statements, Practice Guidelines, Educational Resources, and a Find Genetic Services tool. The educational and public health programs of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics are dependent upon charitable gifts from corporations, foundations, and individuals through the ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine.

American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

Related Genetics Articles:

Genetics researchers find new neurodevelopmental syndrome
Researchers have identified a gene mutation that causes developmental delay, intellectual disability, behavioral abnormalities and musculoskeletal problems in children.
The genetics of cancer
A research team has identified a new circular RNA (ribonucleic acid) that increases tumor activity in soft tissue and connective tissue tumors.
New results on fungal genetics
An international team of researchers has found unusual genetic features in fungi of the order Trichosporonales.
Mouse genetics influences the microbiome more than environment
Genetics has a greater impact on the microbiome than maternal birth environment, at least in mice, according to a study published this week in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
New insights into genetics of fly longevity
Alexey Moskalev, Ph.D., Head of the Laboratory of Molecular Radiobiology and Gerontology Institute of Biology, and co-authors from the Institute of biology of Komi Science Center of RAS, Engelgard's Institute of molecular biology, involved in the study of the aging mechanisms and longevity of model animals announce the publication of a scientific article titled: 'The Neuronal Overexpression of Gclc in Drosophila melanogaster Induces Life Extension With Longevity-Associated Transcriptomic Changes in the Thorax' in Frontiers in Genetics - a leading open science platform.
More Genetics News and Genetics Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Erasing The Stigma
Many of us either cope with mental illness or know someone who does. But we still have a hard time talking about it. This hour, TED speakers explore ways to push past — and even erase — the stigma. Guests include musician and comedian Jordan Raskopoulos, neuroscientist and psychiatrist Thomas Insel, psychiatrist Dixon Chibanda, anxiety and depression researcher Olivia Remes, and entrepreneur Sangu Delle.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...