Nav: Home

Gorilla relationships limited in large groups

July 28, 2020

Mountain gorillas that live in oversized groups may have to limit the number of strong social relationships they form, new research suggests.

Scientists from the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund (Fossey Fund) and University of Exeter identified up to seven categories of relationship between gorillas - ranging from close mother-offspring ties to "weak" associations.

Mountain gorillas usually live in groups of 12 to 20, and the study found the richest range of relationships in groups of this size.

When groups were smaller or larger - sometimes up to 65 gorillas - the scientists found less diversity of social relationships.

"It is often assumed that animals living in larger groups will have more diverse and complex social lives," said Dr Robin Morrison, of the Fossey Fund and Exeter's Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour.

"However, our study suggests that social diversity is lower in very large groups where gorillas must maintain a larger number of relationships - with most relationships falling into the weakest category.

"Strong social relationships still exist in the big groups, but they seem to make up a smaller proportion of the total relationships.

"We cannot say for certain why this is, but it may be that gorillas only have enough time and mental energy to maintain a certain number of relationships at a given strength.

"So they keep their key relationships and simply maintain weak ties with all the other gorillas in the group."

Dr Morrison added: "Living in a social group requires mental effort.

"Indeed, one of the big ideas in social evolution is that humans developed large brains and language to deal with social complexity."

The research team used 12 years of data on 13 gorilla groups monitored by the Fossey Fund in Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda.

Mountain gorilla numbers in the park have risen in recent years, which may explain why unusually large groups have formed.

The gorillas live in stable social groups, moving and feeding together in the day and nesting together at night.

The study used proximity data - how much time individuals spent close together - to measure social relationships.

"In many primates, social interaction can be measured by how much time individuals spend grooming each other," Dr Morrison said.

"However, gorillas spend less time grooming than most other primates.

"Instead, a lot of gorilla society is about who individuals choose to sit next to, and who they move away from."

The relationship categories identified by the scientists relate to different patterns of interaction revealed by the data.

These represent a scale of from close to weak associations, but the categories cannot be simply expressed in human terms such as best friends, close friends, etc.

Lauren Brent, Associate Professor at the University of Exeter, said: "Not only were groups above a certain size not more socially diverse, but individuals living in the same group had variable levels of social complexity - some gorillas had a greater diversity of social relationships than others.

"This adds to a rich body of evidence that shows that, whether you are a human, gorilla or another type of social animal, not everyone experiences their social world in the same way."

The researchers found that the diversity of social relationships experienced by individual gorillas varied by age and sex.

Both males and females experience a diverse range of relationships as youngsters, but this changes as they age.

While females maintain a relatively consistent diversity of relationships through adolescence and adulthood, this declines rapidly in males as they enter adolescence, reaching the lowest levels at around 14.

At this age, males show many characteristics of sexual maturity but are still several years from full sexual maturity.

This is also the period when males are most likely to decide whether to leave the group they were born into - so they may be socially distancing themselves in the lead up to this departure.

If they choose to remain, as roughly half do, they then gradually build up a diverse set of relationships through adulthood as they take on key social roles protecting the group and fathering and caring for offspring.

The research findings could be useful for gorilla conservation, including efforts to limit the spread of disease.

"By better understanding these social relationships, we can better understand how diseases would spread through these social groups," said Dr Tara Stoinski, President and CEO of the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund and one of the study co-authors.

"This is really important right now for mountain gorillas because disease is one of the major threats to their conservation.

"They catch many of the same diseases as humans, including Ebola, and it's extremely likely they would also catch COVID-19 if they were exposed to it.

"Long-term monitoring and protection of endangered mountain gorillas is crucial, not only for their conservation but also for what we can learn from this intelligent and highly social species about how complex social behaviour, such as our own, has evolved."
The paper, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, is entitled: "Comparing measures of social complexity: larger mountain gorilla groups do not have a greater diversity of relationships."

University of Exeter

Related Relationships Articles:

Gorilla relationships limited in large groups
Mountain gorillas that live in oversized groups may have to limit the number of strong social relationships they form, new research suggests.
Electronic surveillance in couple relationships
Impaired intimacy, satisfaction, and infidelity in a romantic relationship can fuel Interpersonal Electronic Surveillance (IES).
'Feeling obligated' can impact relationships during social distancing
In a time where many are practicing 'social distancing' from the outside world, people are relying on their immediate social circles more than usual.
We can make predictions about relationships - but is this necessary?
'Predictions as to the longevity of a relationship are definitely possible,' says Dr Christine Finn from the University of Jena.
Disruptions of salesperson-customer relationships. Is that always bad?
Implications from sales relationship disruptions are intricate and can be revitalizing.
Do open relationships really work?
Open relationships typically describe couples in which the partners have agreed on sexual activity with someone other than their primary romantic partner, while maintaining the couple bond.
The 7 types of sugar daddy relationships
University of Colorado Denver researcher looks inside 48 sugar daddy relationships to better understand the different types of dynamics, break down the typical stereotype(s) and better understand how these relationships work in the United States.
Positive relationships boost self-esteem, and vice versa
Does having close friends boost your self-esteem, or does having high self-esteem influence the quality of your friendships?
Strong family relationships may help with asthma outcomes for children
Positive family relationships might help youth to maintain good asthma management behaviors even in the face of difficult neighborhood conditions, according to a new Northwestern University study.
In romantic relationships, people do indeed have a 'type'
Researchers at the University of Toronto show that people do indeed have a 'type' when it comes to dating, and that despite best intentions to date outside that type -- for example, after a bad relationship -- some will gravitate to similar partners.
More Relationships News and Relationships Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Listen Again: The Power Of Spaces
How do spaces shape the human experience? In what ways do our rooms, homes, and buildings give us meaning and purpose? This hour, TED speakers explore the power of the spaces we make and inhabit. Guests include architect Michael Murphy, musician David Byrne, artist Es Devlin, and architect Siamak Hariri.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#576 Science Communication in Creative Places
When you think of science communication, you might think of TED talks or museum talks or video talks, or... people giving lectures. It's a lot of people talking. But there's more to sci comm than that. This week host Bethany Brookshire talks to three people who have looked at science communication in places you might not expect it. We'll speak with Mauna Dasari, a graduate student at Notre Dame, about making mammals into a March Madness match. We'll talk with Sarah Garner, director of the Pathologists Assistant Program at Tulane University School of Medicine, who takes pathology instruction out of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

What If?
There's plenty of speculation about what Donald Trump might do in the wake of the election. Would he dispute the results if he loses? Would he simply refuse to leave office, or even try to use the military to maintain control? Last summer, Rosa Brooks got together a team of experts and political operatives from both sides of the aisle to ask a slightly different question. Rather than arguing about whether he'd do those things, they dug into what exactly would happen if he did. Part war game part choose your own adventure, Rosa's Transition Integrity Project doesn't give us any predictions, and it isn't a referendum on Trump. Instead, it's a deeply illuminating stress test on our laws, our institutions, and on the commitment to democracy written into the constitution. This episode was reported by Bethel Habte, with help from Tracie Hunte, and produced by Bethel Habte. Jeremy Bloom provided original music. Support Radiolab by becoming a member today at     You can read The Transition Integrity Project's report here.