Nav: Home

National Academies publishes guide to help public officials make sense of COVID-19 data

July 30, 2020

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, officials across the country have had to make decisions about opening and closing schools, businesses and community facilities. They have relied in large part on information about the pandemic -- from hospitalization statistics to test results -- to inform these decisions. But different facts and figures about COVID-19 can paint different pictures of the pandemic, according to Adrian Raftery, a professor of statistics and sociology at the University of Washington.

"The COVID-19 pandemic is generating many different types of data about this disease in communities -- ¬things like the number of confirmed cases or the number of deaths in a particular area," said Raftery. "None of these data sources on their own are perfect in terms of capturing a complete and accurate summary of the prevalence of COVID-19 and the risks of doing certain things like opening businesses or schools. All have their own strengths and weaknesses."

Raftery is lead author of a new guide published June 11 by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine that is intended to help officials nationwide make sense of these different COVID-19 data sources when making public health decisions.

Officials looking for COVID-19 statistics have plenty to choose from: confirmed cases, deaths, hospitalizations, intensive care unit occupancy, emergency room visits, antibody tests, nasal-swab tests and the ratio of positive test results - to name a few of the more common data points collected and distributed by hospitals and public health agencies. But officials don't necessarily have all of these statistics on hand when making decisions, or have enough information to interpret them.

"We intend for this guide to help these decision-makers and their advisors interpret the data on COVID-19 and understand the upsides and downsides of each data source," said Raftery.

For example, the number of positive test results for the novel coronavirus is likely an underestimate of its true prevalence in a community. Many people who have the virus are asymptomatic and aren't likely to seek out a test, and even people with symptoms may not have access to tests and medical care, according to Raftery. As another example, the number of COVID-19 deaths in a region does not reflect the disease's current prevalence because the number of deaths lag behind the number of cases by several weeks. In addition, some deaths may be misattributed to COVID-19, Raftery said.

The guide highlights some criteria for officials to take into account when assessing the usefulness of particular COVID-19 data points, including:
  • Assessing how representative the data are for a community or region
  • Whether there may be systemic biases in some data sources
  • Thinking about the types of uncertainties in data sources, due to factors like sample size, how data were collected and the population surveyed
  • Whether there's a time lag due to delays in reporting data, the course of the disease and other factors
"There are no perfect data sources, but all of these data sources are still useful for making decisions that directly impact public health," said Raftery.

Raftery has worked extensively on statistical methods to measure and estimate the prevalence of other viruses, including HIV in Africa. Though HIV and the novel coronavirus cause different types of diseases, there are similarities in how the two viruses spread among susceptible populations, as well as how types of social distancing -- condom use for HIV and physical distancing and mask usage for the novel coronavirus -- can decrease transmission. COVID-19 is also generating the same types of data sources, with the same limitations, as HIV/AIDS, such as test results, hospitalization rates and deaths.

Over time, it may be possible to collect more revealing data about COVID-19 from what are known as "representative random samples" within a population. In representative sampling, people are surveyed at random for a disease, and certain populations can be more heavily sampled than others based on what scientists and officials have learned about a disease's prevalence and susceptibility. Representative sampling avoids biases and can more accurately estimate the disease's prevalence in a region, according to Raftery.

"As we learn more about COVID-19, how it spreads, how different populations are more or less susceptible, we may be able to move more in the direction of representative sampling," said Raftery. "The State of Indiana has already done a survey of this kind, and others should follow suit. But there is also a lot that officials can do with the statistics and data sources that hospitals and agencies are providing right now -- provided that officials can be made aware of the strengths and weaknesses of each piece of data."

The guide is the first completed by the National Academies' Societal Experts Action Network -- or SEAN -- an eight-member committee tasked by the National Academies to provide rapid expert assistance on issues related to the social and behavioral sciences during the pandemic. Raftery is a member of the SEAN and spearheaded this inaugural project.
-end-
Co-authors on the guide are Janet Currie, a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University; Mary Bassett, a professor of public health at Harvard University; and Robert Groves, the provost of Georgetown University. The SEAN and its efforts are funded by the National Academies and the National Science Foundation.

For more information, contact Raftery at raftery@uw.edu.

On Aug. 6, 2020 at 1 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time (10 a.m. U.S. Pacific Time) the National Academies will host a webinar "Understanding COVID-19 data -- what decision-makers need to know"

URL to register for the event: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/webinar-understanding-covid-19-data-what-decision-makers-need-to-know-registration-114443884740

Link to full release with images: https://www.washington.edu/news/2020/07/30/national-academies-covid19-data-guide/

University of Washington

Related Pandemic Articles:

New Zealanders' attitudes changed after pandemic lockdown
In the first few weeks of the lockdown of New Zealand in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, residents reported a slight increase in mental distress but higher levels of confidence in the government, science and the police, as well as greater patriotism, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.
A risk-tailored approach to reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic
A tailored public health approach that accounts for variation in risks across populations, places and time could guide the next phase of Canada's coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response, argue authors in a commentary in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).
New model predicts the peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic
This week in the journal Frontiers, researchers describe a single function that accurately describes all existing available data on active COVID-19 cases and deaths -- and predicts forthcoming peaks.
COVID-19 pandemic uniting Canadians like no other event in decades
A new study by researchers from McGill University and the University of Toronto finds a cross-partisan consensus on battling COVID-19 in Canada.
How to identify which interventions work best in a pandemic
In lieu of a vaccine or reliable preventative medications, the only approaches currently available to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 are behavioral -- handwashing, mask-wearing and social distancing, for example.
Nationwide survey about the corona pandemic
Majority feels strained, trusts health measures and favors a wealth tax on the rich.
COVID-19: Lessons to learn about the first 4.0 pandemic
Although the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was officially presented suddenly in the popular market of exotic and wild animals in Wuhan in December 2019, phylogenetic studies state that coronavirus was already present in latency phase since October in this city in the province of Hubei.
Local climate unlikely to drive the early COVID-19 pandemic
Princeton researchers report in the journal Science that the number of people still vulnerable to COVID-19 and the speed at which the disease spreads means that local climate conditions are not likely to dominate the first wave of the pandemic.
Digital health in the COVID-19 pandemic
Artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain, and other key digital technology applications will play a vital role addressing the new healthcare challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Gaps in international law impede pandemic research
The global COVID-19 pandemic reveals gaps in international law that can inhibit the sharing of scientific information, biological samples and genetic sequence data (GSD) crucial to the timely development of diagnostics, antiviral treatments and vaccines to address novel viral threats.
More Pandemic News and Pandemic Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Listen Again: The Biology Of Sex
Original broadcast date: May 8, 2020. Many of us were taught biological sex is a question of female or male, XX or XY ... but it's far more complicated. This hour, TED speakers explore what determines our sex. Guests on the show include artist Emily Quinn, journalist Molly Webster, neuroscientist Lisa Mosconi, and structural biologist Karissa Sanbonmatsu.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#569 Facing Fear
What do you fear? I mean really fear? Well, ok, maybe right now that's tough. We're living in a new age and definition of fear. But what do we do about it? Eva Holland has faced her fears, including trauma and phobia. She lived to tell the tale and write a book: "Nerve: Adventures in the Science of Fear".
Now Playing: Radiolab

The Wubi Effect
When we think of China today, we think of a technological superpower. From Huweai and 5G to TikTok and viral social media, China is stride for stride with the United States in the world of computing. However, China's technological renaissance almost didn't happen. And for one very basic reason: The Chinese language, with its 70,000 plus characters, couldn't fit on a keyboard.  Today, we tell the story of Professor Wang Yongmin, a hard headed computer programmer who solved this puzzle and laid the foundation for the China we know today. This episode was reported and produced by Simon Adler with reporting assistance from Yang Yang. Special thanks to Martin Howard. You can view his renowned collection of typewriters at: antiquetypewriters.com Support Radiolab today at Radiolab.org/donate.