Participants at HKU conference call for attention to research quality

August 02, 2019

Scientists worldwide work tirelessly to advance human knowledge and discoveries. One estimate suggests that about three million research articles are published each year, spread across some 30,000 journals.

Despite the quantity, however, many think that improvements can be made to the research culture to bring forth even more significant impact on the world.

To explore the way to go and share best practices, about 700 researchers, teachers, leaders of funding agencies, government officials, journal editors etc. from 60 countries gathered at the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity held at the University of Hong Kong between June 2 and 5. Entitled New Challenges for Research Integrity, the conference heard enriching views on improving the current system for funding research and rewarding faculty.

Among the plenary speakers were Australia's Chief Scientist Alan Finkel; Dr David Moher, Associate Professor from the School of Epidemiology and Public Health at the University of Ottawa; Professor Mai Har Sham, Associate Vice-President (Research) of HKU and co-chair of the organizing committee for the conference, and Dr Maura Hiney, the Head of Post-Award and Education at the Irish Health Research Board. They agreed on moving away from the current, long established practice of assessing research efforts on the basis of metrics predominantly the number of publications and citations in academic journals.

Dr Finkel noted that there are more than 20,000 retracted papers in the Retraction Watch database, which reflects a need for strengthened quality control. "Research institutions have to be more explicit in conveying the message to their research staff that quality counts," he said.

He suggested the Rule of Five for funding agencies and institutions, namely that aspiring researchers should be asked to submit only their best five papers over the past five years, accompanied by a description of the research, its impact and their individual contribution. To ensure quality, agencies should only consider research that has been published in journals compliant with Publication Process Quality Assurance (PPQA) guidelines or those developed by organisations like COPE - the Committee on Publication Ethics.

"Higher levels of PPQA could pick up on the Transparency and Open Promotion guidelines, known as the TOP guidelines, compiled by the Centre for Open Science, or the Reproducibility and Replicability in Science recommendations published this year by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine," he explained.

Dr Finkel singled out Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) as an example of a granting agency thoughtfully and deliberately shifting the incentives to strengthen the system. The Rule of Five is now in place for some NHMRC grant schemes - and in future, it may well be extended.

Based on the principle of "follow the money", Dr Finkel also recommended that granting agencies should make proof of research integrity training a requirement for applying for a grant - a call echoed by other speakers.

The conference saw the release of the Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity - intended to serve as guiding principles to help institutions improve the current system of faculty incentives and rewards.

Co-author Dr David Moher noted the common frustration with the prevailing "Publish or Perish" culture, which he claims exacerbates the pressure on academics and causes some to engage in duplication, use poor methodology, research design or other practices that could undermine the credibility of their scientific endeavours. "There is evidence that researchers will tailor their publication practices and behaviours in order to advance their career," said Dr Moher.

The five Hong Kong Principles include 1, Assess researchers (and institutions) on responsible practices from conception to delivery, including the development of the research idea, research design, methodology and execution and effective dissemination; 2, Value the accurate and transparent reporting of all research, regardless of the results and reward honest and transparent reporting ; 3, Value the practices of open science - such as open methods, materials and data - when feasible; 4, Value a broad range of research and scholarship, such as replication, synthesis, and meta-research; 5, Value a range of other contributions to responsible research and scholarly activity, such as peer review for grants and publications, mentoring, outreach, and knowledge transfer.

Dr Hiney defines research integrity as the collective responsibility of researchers, funding agencies, institutions. "It is inward facing, addressing quality, reliability, trustworthiness of the research output and outcome, with which we are moving towards innovation, translation of research innovations."

Professor Sham supports the idea of incorporating research integrity training into the graduate curriculum. It is equally important, she adds, that ranking agencies put the same weight on the proposed values in their assessment of institutions.
-end-


The University of Hong Kong

Related Science Articles from Brightsurf:

75 science societies urge the education department to base Title IX sexual harassment regulations on evidence and science
The American Educational Research Association (AERA) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) today led 75 scientific societies in submitting comments on the US Department of Education's proposed changes to Title IX regulations.

Science/Science Careers' survey ranks top biotech, biopharma, and pharma employers
The Science and Science Careers' 2018 annual Top Employers Survey polled employees in the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical, pharmaceutical, and related industries to determine the 20 best employers in these industries as well as their driving characteristics.

Science in the palm of your hand: How citizen science transforms passive learners
Citizen science projects can engage even children who previously were not interested in science.

Applied science may yield more translational research publications than basic science
While translational research can happen at any stage of the research process, a recent investigation of behavioral and social science research awards granted by the NIH between 2008 and 2014 revealed that applied science yielded a higher volume of translational research publications than basic science, according to a study published May 9, 2018 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Xueying Han from the Science and Technology Policy Institute, USA, and colleagues.

Prominent academics, including Salk's Thomas Albright, call for more science in forensic science
Six scientists who recently served on the National Commission on Forensic Science are calling on the scientific community at large to advocate for increased research and financial support of forensic science as well as the introduction of empirical testing requirements to ensure the validity of outcomes.

World Science Forum 2017 Jordan issues Science for Peace Declaration
On behalf of the coordinating organizations responsible for delivering the World Science Forum Jordan, the concluding Science for Peace Declaration issued at the Dead Sea represents a global call for action to science and society to build a future that promises greater equality, security and opportunity for all, and in which science plays an increasingly prominent role as an enabler of fair and sustainable development.

PETA science group promotes animal-free science at society of toxicology conference
The PETA International Science Consortium Ltd. is presenting two posters on animal-free methods for testing inhalation toxicity at the 56th annual Society of Toxicology (SOT) meeting March 12 to 16, 2017, in Baltimore, Maryland.

Citizen Science in the Digital Age: Rhetoric, Science and Public Engagement
James Wynn's timely investigation highlights scientific studies grounded in publicly gathered data and probes the rhetoric these studies employ.

Science/Science Careers' survey ranks top biotech, pharma, and biopharma employers
The Science and Science Careers' 2016 annual Top Employers Survey polled employees in the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical, pharmaceutical, and related industries to determine the 20 best employers in these industries as well as their driving characteristics.

Three natural science professors win TJ Park Science Fellowship
Professor Jung-Min Kee (Department of Chemistry, UNIST), Professor Kyudong Choi (Department of Mathematical Sciences, UNIST), and Professor Kwanpyo Kim (Department of Physics, UNIST) are the recipients of the Cheong-Am (TJ Park) Science Fellowship of the year 2016.

Read More: Science News and Science Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.