Nav: Home

Focus on future to save more money

August 04, 2016

DENVER - When it comes to personal finances, impulsiveness and materialism can lead to bad decisions and a failure to save enough, but research presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association suggests that when people focus more on the future, they tend to be less impulsive, regardless of their level of financial literacy.

"Our results suggest that by helping people to create vivid, detailed mental pictures of their future, we may be able to help people make better financial decisions," said Sarah Newcomb, PhD, a behavioral economist at Morningstar, who presented the research.

As life expectancy continues to grow in the United States and fewer employers offer fixed-income retirement programs in the form of pensions, there is a greater need than ever for individuals to save for their retirement themselves, according to Newcomb. Unfortunately, savings rates have dropped to only about 40 percent of what they were in the 1980s.

"We wanted to better understand the psychological factors that drive consumer spending and saving with the hope of identifying and targeting those that could potentially motivate more saving and investment among people who have adequate resources but poor financial management skills," she said.

In the study, Newcomb and her colleagues conducted an online survey of over 700 adults in the United States (57 percent male; 47 percent had a bachelor's degree or higher). Participants were asked questions designed to measure financial behaviors as well as attitudes known to be associated with saving or spending, including impulsiveness, materialism, financial literacy and the extent to which they think about the future.

As expected, the researchers found that high levels of impulsiveness and materialism were associated with poor financial decision-making (i.e., more spending, less saving). They also discovered that while financial literacy and the way people think about the future were both associated with good financial decisions, the strongest predictor was not literacy but focus on the future.

Further analysis suggested that the only relationship that could be found among the four attitudes was between impulsiveness and future focus. Individuals who spent more time contemplating events yet to come scored significantly lower in impulsiveness.

These findings offer a starting point for developing behavioral interventions to promote savings, budgeting, and other positive financial interventions, according to Newcomb.

"The U.S. government has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into financial literacy programs, but these findings suggest that financial literacy alone may not be the answer," she said. "Working with individuals to develop a clearer picture of their future may have a more substantial impact than simply teaching financial concepts."

One finding Newcomb said was completely unexpected involved those individuals who did not use credit: The effect of impulsiveness on bad financial behavior disappeared.

"This suggests that the first line of intervention for better financial health among people who struggle with impulse problems may be to stop the use of credit cards altogether," said Newcomb.

However, for those unwilling to cut up their credit cards, there may be a solution. Simple visualization and writing exercises designed to help people create vivid, detailed mental pictures of their future help them improve their financial behaviors and ultimately their lives, she said.
-end-
Session 1109: "Overcoming Impulsiveness: Identifying Prime Targets for Interventions to Improve Financial Behavior," Paper Session, Thursday, Aug. 4, 10 - 10:50 a.m. MDT, Room 112, Level 2, Meeting Room Level, Colorado Convention Center, 700 14th Street, Denver.

Presentations are available from the APA Public Affairs Office.

Contact: Sarah Newcomb at Sarah.Newcomb@morningstar.com or by phone at (202) 803-5247 x128.

The American Psychological Association, in Washington, D.C., is the largest scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States. APA's membership includes more than 117,500 researchers, educators, clinicians, consultants and students. Through its divisions in 54 subfields of psychology and affiliations with 60 state, territorial and Canadian provincial associations, APA works to advance the creation, communication and application of psychological knowledge to benefit society and improve people's lives.

http://www.apa.org

American Psychological Association

Related Literacy Articles:

Reading to therapy dogs improves literacy attitudes in second-grade students
Second-grade students who read aloud to dogs in an afterschool program demonstrated improved attitudes about reading, according to researchers at Tufts Institute for Human-Animal Interaction at Tufts University.
Reading with children starting in infancy gives lasting literacy boost
New research at the 2017 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting shows that reading books with a child beginning in early infancy can boost vocabulary and reading skills four years later, before the start of elementary school.
When do speech difficulties in children matter for literacy?
A new study found that speech difficulties are linked with difficulties in learning to read when children first start school, but these effects are no longer apparent at 8 years of age.
Science: Public interest high, literacy stable
While public interest in science continues to grow, the level of US scientific literacy remains largely unchanged, according to a survey by the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
Fulbright grant will fund research of women's sexual health literacy in West Africa
Eusebius Small, a UTA assistant professor in the School of Social Work, will use a Fulbright award to study factors that contribute to HIV incidence in young women in Sierra Leone.
Older adults have 'toxic combination' of lower financial literacy, higher self-confidence
Previous studies have shown that as humans age, cognitive declines are inevitable.
Patients with low literacy levels get health information from commercial websites
When searching the internet for health information, people with less education and lower literacy levels are more likely to visit poorer quality commercial websites, according to a study published in the ARC Journal of Urology.
Providing children with tablets loaded with literacy apps yields positive results
Researchers at MIT, Tufts University, and Georgia State University have been conducting a study to determine whether tablet computers loaded with literacy applications could improve the reading preparedness of young children living in economically disadvantaged communities.
Temple professors use cadaver DNA to advance genetics literacy in medical curricula
Cadavers have long been one of the most important resources for anatomy teaching in medical school.
Uncorrected farsightedness linked to literacy deficits in preschoolers
A study funded by the National Eye Institute, part of the National Institutes of Health, has shown that uncorrected farsightedness (hyperopia) in preschool children is associated with significantly worse performance on a test of early literacy.

Related Literacy Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#529 Do You Really Want to Find Out Who's Your Daddy?
At least some of you by now have probably spit into a tube and mailed it off to find out who your closest relatives are, where you might be from, and what terrible diseases might await you. But what exactly did you find out? And what did you give away? In this live panel at Awesome Con we bring in science writer Tina Saey to talk about all her DNA testing, and bioethicist Debra Mathews, to determine whether Tina should have done it at all. Related links: What FamilyTreeDNA sharing genetic data with police means for you Crime solvers embraced...