Even science Nobel Laureates find acceptance isn't a given, study finds

August 06, 2011

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The path of success for Nobel Prize laureates in the sciences isn't a straight shot from obscurity to never-ending scientific superstardom, a new study reveals.

Instead, many laureates see their Nobel-winning idea grow in acceptance from their first related scientific article to their most successful publication. But their later work related to the Nobel idea gains less acceptance, and many times is no more accepted by the scientific community than their very first efforts.

"In many cases, we found that Nobel laureates' final publication on their idea that won the Prize was lowest in our measures of acceptance," said Christine Charyton, who led the study as a visiting assistant professor and lecturer in psychology at Ohio State University.

"While their work is still successful, laureates find their later work doesn't get the same level of attention and acceptance as their earlier work." Charyton said.

However, there are exceptions, and the path to idea acceptance differs for laureates in physics when compared to those in chemistry and medicine, the researchers found.

In conducting the study, Charyton mentored Samantha DeDios, who did the work for her senior honors thesis at Ohio State. Thomas Nygren, professor of psychology at Ohio State, also advised DeDios on the research.

They presented their work during a session on scientific approaches to creativity Aug. 6 at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association in Washington, D.C.

The purpose of the study was to find out how creative ideas in the sciences become accepted in their fields, said Charyton, who teaches the psychology of creativity at Ohio State.

"Even Nobel Prize-winning ideas take a long time to get accepted and the acceptance does not remain stable," Charyton said.

The study involved 204 Nobel laureates from 1980 to 2009 in physics, chemistry and medicine. In order to evaluate the acceptance of the laureates' prize-winning ideas, the researchers measured the effect of the articles that the laureates published in scientific journals. Journal articles are the major way in which scientific findings are disseminated.

By measuring how much of an influence these articles had within their scientific disciplines, the researchers could determine how much they had been accepted.

The researchers used several different measures regarding the effect of research publications. For example, one measure was how many times the article was cited by other scientists in their publications. This reflects how well-known a particular publication is among the scientific community.

Another measure was the "impact factor" of the journals that published the laureates' articles. This is a statistical formula that measures the importance or influence of a particular journal at a particular time.

The researchers looked at three key publications in the laureates' careers: the first publication concerning the idea that won them a Nobel Prize; the highest-cited publication concerning their Nobel idea; and the last publication concerning their Nobel idea.

Using several publicly available databases, including the ISI Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports, the researchers were able to see how these three publications of each laureate fared on the measurements.

Overall, the findings showed that, on many measures, Nobel laureates' most highly cited publication was indeed more accepted than their first publication.

Surprisingly, though, the Nobel laureates' first publication was almost always more accepted than their final publication involving the Nobel-winning idea, except for physicists. That suggests the glow of scientific acceptance that occurs after winning a Nobel Prize doesn't always extend to their later career.

The researchers don't know for sure why the last paper was less accepted than the first, but there are several possible reasons.

For one, the more prestigious journals may not want to publish more articles on the Nobel winning idea, figuring the new work is too related to what has already been published. Another possibility is that their last paper may have diverged too much from their original prize-winning idea.

"If the last paper diverges enough from the original idea, it may be seen as a novel idea again, and it will take some time to become accepted," DeDios said.

But the researchers cautioned that these are just possibilities, and more work is needed to determine why the final paper gets less acceptance.

They did find some differences in the path to acceptance in the three fields studied. In general, the impact factor measure showed that the physics laureates' publications were in less prestigious journals compared to those in medicine and chemistry, suggesting that the physics domain is more specialized and less accessible to the public. That may reflect differences in the scientific culture of physics compared to those in medicine and chemistry. For example, in recent years scientific journals have become less important in physics because more researchers are publishing online rather than in traditional journals.

The researchers did find that the first Nobel publication of physics laureates had a lower impact than their last Nobel-idea publication, which was opposite from those in chemistry and medicine.

Still, Nygren said he was struck by the similarities in the path to scientific acceptance taken by laureates in all three fields.

"It would be interesting to apply these tests in other fields, such as economics, but based on these findings I would suspect we would find very similar results," Nygren said.
Contact: Christine Charyton, Charyton.1@osu.edu
Thomas Nygren, (614) 292-3038; Nygren.1@osu.edu

Written by Jeff Grabmeier, (614) 292-8457; Grabmeier.1@osu.edu

Ohio State University

Related Physics Articles from Brightsurf:

Helium, a little atom for big physics
Helium is the simplest multi-body atom. Its energy levels can be calculated with extremely high precision only relying on a few fundamental physical constants and the quantum electrodynamics (QED) theory.

Hyperbolic metamaterials exhibit 2T physics
According to Igor Smolyaninov of the University of Maryland, ''One of the more unusual applications of metamaterials was a theoretical proposal to construct a physical system that would exhibit two-time physics behavior on small scales.''

Challenges and opportunities for women in physics
Women in the United States hold fewer than 25% of bachelor's degrees, 20% of doctoral degrees and 19% of faculty positions in physics.

Indeterminist physics for an open world
Classical physics is characterized by the equations describing the world.

Leptons help in tracking new physics
Electrons with 'colleagues' -- other leptons - are one of many products of collisions observed in the LHCb experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.

Has physics ever been deterministic?
Researchers from the Austrian Academy of Sciences, the University of Vienna and the University of Geneva, have proposed a new interpretation of classical physics without real numbers.

Twisted physics
A new study in the journal Nature shows that superconductivity in bilayer graphene can be turned on or off with a small voltage change, increasing its usefulness for electronic devices.

Physics vs. asthma
A research team from the MIPT Center for Molecular Mechanisms of Aging and Age-Related Diseases has collaborated with colleagues from the U.S., Canada, France, and Germany to determine the spatial structure of the CysLT1 receptor.

2D topological physics from shaking a 1D wire
Published in Physical Review X, this new study propose a realistic scheme to observe a 'cold-atomic quantum Hall effect.'

Helping physics teachers who don't know physics
A shortage of high school physics teachers has led to teachers with little-to-no training taking over physics classrooms, reports show.

Read More: Physics News and Physics Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.