Experts challenge popular belief that today's children are 'over-scheduled'

August 12, 2006

Leading child development experts are challenging the popular notion that today's children are "over-scheduled" as a result of the hurried and stressful lives from participating in too many organized activities. In fact, an analysis of new data from a national study and a review of the scientific evidence by three scientific experts, as well as commentaries by three other top child development experts, concludes that children participate in organized activities because they enjoy them, they are exciting, they provide encouragement and support from friends and peers, they are challenging and they increase self worth.

The report also highlights that youth who participate in organized activities show healthier functioning than those who do not participate, in areas such as academic success, substance use, and the quality of relationships with their parents. "These are indicators of well being, and we should be concerned that many youth are not participating in organized activities," according to Dr. Joseph Mahoney of Yale University. Mahoney and his co-authors, Drs. Angel Harris of the University of Texas at Austin and Jacquelynne Eccles of the University of Michigan, published their findings in Social Policy Report, a peer-reviewed publication of the Society for Research in Child Development (SCRD).

Their paper concludes "organized activities do not dominate American young people's free time; many alternative free time activities, such as educational activities, playing games and watching television, consume as much or considerably more time. There is scant support for the over-scheduling hypothesis and considerable support for the positive youth development perspective."

Other experts, such as Drs. Suniya Luthar and Jodie Roth, both of Columbia University, and Dr. Reed Larson of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, writing in the same issue of SPR, also question the belief that over-scheduling is a problem.

"Perhaps more so than the children, it is the parents who are overextended, with ongoing conflicts regarding their life roles. On the one hand is the deep-seated desire to be the best possible parents for their children. On the other hand there can be powerful draws from work," according to Luthar, who looked at the evidence on over-scheduling among children of well-to-do families. Luthar acknowledges the need for more research on parenting and child development in high-income families, but concludes that the distress seen among rich kids is not mainly because of over-scheduling. "Extra-curricular activities are good for them as they are for most youth."

The paper by Roth looked at the evidence on patterns of participation in extra-curricular activities. The few studies that have looked at "duration" of extra-curricular activities find that elementary age kids who participate in an after-school program for two years do better academically than those who participate for just a year. The same can be said for kids in high school extracurricular activities. Roth also says that the costs of no participation in organized activities remain far more worrisome than the public's concern about over-scheduled youth.

The Larson paper also pointed out the need for more research, but pointed to findings suggesting that extra-curricular activities are a unique context for learning teamwork skills and abilities for managing emotions; they may also facilitate the development of "family autonomy," which he defines as being emotionally autonomous while staying connected with the family.

Other findings cited in these papers are:
Excerpted from Social Policy Report, Volume XX, Number IV, Organized Activity Participation, Positive Youth Development, and the Over-Scheduling Hypothesis. Copyright 2006 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc. All rights reserved.

Full text of this report is available for members of the media at:

Society for Research in Child Development

Related Child Development Articles from Brightsurf:

Low level alcohol use during pregnancy can impact child's brain development
A new study finds any alcohol use during pregnancy, even low levels, is associated with subtle, yet significant behavioural and psychological effects in children including anxiety, depression and poor attention.

What jigsaw puzzles tell us about child development
New research shows that children only learn to do jigsaw puzzles once they have reached a certain stage of development.

The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health: Experts call for more awareness of the potential impact of physical distancing on adolescent peer relationships and social development
Authors of an opinion piece, based on a review of evidence and published in The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health journal, are urging policymakers to consider the effects of physical distancing measures introduced to tackle the spread of COVID-19 on young people's social development and wellbeing.

Alcohol consumption by fathers before conception could negatively impact child development
Trouble for alcoholic fathers, hope for alcoholic mothers. Scientists at the University of California, Riverside, have explored the relationship between parental alcohol consumption -- before conception in the case of fathers and during pregnancy in the case of mothers -- and offspring development.

Leaving your baby to 'cry it out' has no adverse effects on child development
Leaving an infant to 'cry it out' from birth up to 18 months does not adversely affect their behaviour development or attachment, researchers from the University of Warwick have found, they also discovered that those left to cry cried less and for a shorter duration at 18 months of age.

Mother nature and child development
A world first review of the importance of nature play could transform children's play spaces, supporting investment in city and urban parks, while also delivering important opportunities for children's physical, social and emotional development.

BU finds some child development milestones may be set too early
A new Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) study published in the journal Pediatrics provides more specific data on what ages young children reach different developmental milestones.

At what age is it considered child neglect to leave a child home alone?
A majority of social workers surveyed believe children should be at least 12 before being left home alone four hours or longer, and they are more likely to consider a home-alone scenario as neglect if a child is injured while left unsupervised, according to research being presented at the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2019 National Conference & Exhibition.

Predictability of parent interaction positively influences child's development
A joint project of the University of Turku's FinnBrain study and the University of California-Irvine (US) investigated the impact of the predictability of parent interaction on a child's development.

India's integrated child development program increases educational attainment
In a new study funded by Grand Challenges Canada through the Saving Brains project, researchers at CDDEP and the University of Pennsylvania evaluated the long-term impact of ICDS on schooling attainment of adolescents and adults in India.

Read More: Child Development News and Child Development Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to