Hospital ratings systems get low grades from experts

August 14, 2019

CHICAGO --- Experts have turned the tables on hospital rating systems and graded the rating systems on their strengths and weaknesses. Most only got "C's" and "D's." The highest grade received was a "B" by U.S. News & World Report, according to a new study.

The study, "Rating the Raters," will be published Aug. 14 in the New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst. It grades the four major publicly reported hospital quality rating systems in the U.S.

"Current hospital quality rating systems often offer conflicting results - a hospital might rate best on one rating system and worst on another," said lead author Dr. Karl Bilimoria, director of the Northwestern Medicine Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center."We wanted to provide information on how to interpret these contradictory ratings, so people can better select the best hospital for their needs."

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Star Ratings received a "C." The lowest grades were for Leapfrog, "C-," and Healthgrades, "D+."

Until now, there has been little guidance on how to compare these rating systems.

"It's been confusing for patients who are trying to make sense of these ratings," said Bilimoria, also the John B. Murphy Professor of Surgery at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine."How are patients supposed to know which rating systems are good or bad? This study gives them information from a group of quality measurement experts to figure out which rating system is the best."

To the investigators' knowledge, this is the first systematic evaluation of current rating systems that could help inform patients, clinicians, policymakers and hospitals themselves of the various rating systems' methodologies, strengths and weaknesses.

Hospital rating systems are proliferating, which makes it essential to accurately evaluate them, Bilimoria said. "There are all these competing rating systems. More and more are coming out," he said. "The public needs some way to know which ones are valid and reliable; otherwise, it will be pure chaos when you are trying to figure out which is the best hospital for you."

There are about 1,000 so-called "top 100" hospitals in the country, depending on which rating system is used. "There is so little overlap," Bilimoria said. "That means there is conflicting information. Different rating systems are identifying different hospitals as being the best."

"A lot of the so-called 'top hospitals' identified by some rating systems are not places that most physicians would refer their patients to," he added. "Because of the flaws in the approach used to rank hospitals, the ratings do not provide an accurate picture. Some hospitals that got top ratings from some of these rating systems just don't make sense based on what we know about them."

The investigators identified several limitations of each individual rating system and the field as a whole. Each system had weaknesses that led to potential misclassification of hospital performance, ranging from inclusion of flawed measures, use of proprietary data that are not validated and methodological decisions.

"We found that many of the current hospital quality rating systems should be used cautiously as they likely often misclassify hospital performance and mislead the public," Bilimoria said.

The diverse group of six evaluators includes established physician scientists with methodological expertise in health care quality measurement from both academic centers and the private sector. Given their experience in this field, all of the evaluators currently or previously have had some relationship with one or more of the rating systems. Thus, each evaluator was required to disclose the nature, timing and financial arrangement of any current or prior relationships.
In addition to Bilimoria, the evaluators include several prominent national leaders in health care quality and patient safety: Peter Pronovost, John Birkmeyer, Helen Burstin, Justin Dimick and Karen Joynt-Maddox.

Bilimoria has been an unpaid advisor to U.S. News & World Report and to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Star Ratings.

Northwestern University

Related Science Articles from Brightsurf:

75 science societies urge the education department to base Title IX sexual harassment regulations on evidence and science
The American Educational Research Association (AERA) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) today led 75 scientific societies in submitting comments on the US Department of Education's proposed changes to Title IX regulations.

Science/Science Careers' survey ranks top biotech, biopharma, and pharma employers
The Science and Science Careers' 2018 annual Top Employers Survey polled employees in the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical, pharmaceutical, and related industries to determine the 20 best employers in these industries as well as their driving characteristics.

Science in the palm of your hand: How citizen science transforms passive learners
Citizen science projects can engage even children who previously were not interested in science.

Applied science may yield more translational research publications than basic science
While translational research can happen at any stage of the research process, a recent investigation of behavioral and social science research awards granted by the NIH between 2008 and 2014 revealed that applied science yielded a higher volume of translational research publications than basic science, according to a study published May 9, 2018 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Xueying Han from the Science and Technology Policy Institute, USA, and colleagues.

Prominent academics, including Salk's Thomas Albright, call for more science in forensic science
Six scientists who recently served on the National Commission on Forensic Science are calling on the scientific community at large to advocate for increased research and financial support of forensic science as well as the introduction of empirical testing requirements to ensure the validity of outcomes.

World Science Forum 2017 Jordan issues Science for Peace Declaration
On behalf of the coordinating organizations responsible for delivering the World Science Forum Jordan, the concluding Science for Peace Declaration issued at the Dead Sea represents a global call for action to science and society to build a future that promises greater equality, security and opportunity for all, and in which science plays an increasingly prominent role as an enabler of fair and sustainable development.

PETA science group promotes animal-free science at society of toxicology conference
The PETA International Science Consortium Ltd. is presenting two posters on animal-free methods for testing inhalation toxicity at the 56th annual Society of Toxicology (SOT) meeting March 12 to 16, 2017, in Baltimore, Maryland.

Citizen Science in the Digital Age: Rhetoric, Science and Public Engagement
James Wynn's timely investigation highlights scientific studies grounded in publicly gathered data and probes the rhetoric these studies employ.

Science/Science Careers' survey ranks top biotech, pharma, and biopharma employers
The Science and Science Careers' 2016 annual Top Employers Survey polled employees in the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical, pharmaceutical, and related industries to determine the 20 best employers in these industries as well as their driving characteristics.

Three natural science professors win TJ Park Science Fellowship
Professor Jung-Min Kee (Department of Chemistry, UNIST), Professor Kyudong Choi (Department of Mathematical Sciences, UNIST), and Professor Kwanpyo Kim (Department of Physics, UNIST) are the recipients of the Cheong-Am (TJ Park) Science Fellowship of the year 2016.

Read More: Science News and Science Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to