Nav: Home

Study examines use of antipsychotics early in pregnancy, risk of birth defects

August 17, 2016

A study of 1.3 million pregnant women suggests antipsychotic medication early in pregnancy was not associated with a meaningful increase in the risk of birth defects when other mitigating factors were considered, although the medication risperidone needs further research, according to a study published online by JAMA Psychiatry.

The use of antipsychotics during pregnancy is increasingly common but clinicians continue to have little information regarding the safety of these drugs on developing fetuses

Krista F. Huybrechts, M.S., Ph.D., of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors used a nationwide Medicaid database for their analyses and defined exposure to antipsychotics as filling at least one prescription during the first trimester (90 days) of pregnancy. The authors evaluated typical (older) and atypical (newer) antipsychotic medications.

Among the more than 1.3 million women, 9,258 women (0.69 percent) filled a prescription for an atypical antipsychotic during the first trimester and 733 women (0.05 percent) filled a prescription for a typical antipsychotic, according to the results. The most frequently used atypical antipsychotic was quetiapine, followed by aripiprazole, risperidone, olanzapine and ziprasidone.

Overall, 32.7 per 1,000 births not exposed to antipsychotics were diagnosed with congenital malformations compared with 44.5 per 1,000 births exposed to atypical antipsychotics and 38.2 per 1,000 births exposed to typical antipsychotics, according to the results.

While unadjusted analyses suggested an increased risk of birth defects with atypical antipsychotics, the authors report they observed no significant increased risk of birth defects for typical or atypical antipsychotics after accounting for coexisting mental and physical conditions and their associated behaviors, with the possible exception of risperidone.

Authors warn the small increase in risk with rispedicone must be interpreted with caution because there is not a biological mechanism that readily explains the outcome: "This finding should therefore be interpreted as a potential safety signal that will require follow-up in other studies."

Study limitations include possible misclassification and selection bias, as well as the potential that medications were not taken even though prescriptions were filled.

"Our findings suggest that use of APs [antipsychotics] early in pregnancy does not meaningfully increase the risk for congenital malformation or cardiac malformation, with the possible exception of risperidone. The findings for risperidone should be viewed as an initial safety signal that will require confirmation in other studies," the study concludes.

(JAMA Psychiatry. Published online August 17, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1520. Available pre-embargo to the media at http://media.jamanetwork.com.)

Editor's Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.

Editorial: Use of Antipsychotics During Pregnancy

"The authors found that associations between AP exposure and birth defects were attenuated after adjustment for confounding, which implies that these variables, rather than AP exposure, account for much of the effect on congenital malformations. ... This landmark report, with the largest population of women exposed to APs published to date to our knowledge, demonstrates that exposure to APs (other an risperidone) does not significantly increase the risk for birth defects, which has been a major source of concern for women and prescribers," write Katherine L. Wisner, M.D., of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, and coauthors in a related editorial.

(JAMA Psychiatry. Published online August 17, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1538. Available pre-embargo to the media at http://media.jamanetwork.com.)

Editor's Note: The article contains conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
-end-
Media Advisory: To contact study corresponding author Krista F. Huybrechts, M.S., Ph.D., call Elaine St. Peter at 617-525-6375 or email estpeter@partners.org. To contact corresponding editorial author Katherine L. Wisner, M.D., M.S., call Marla Paul at 312-503-8928 or email marla-paul@northwestern.edu.

The JAMA Network Journals

Related Pregnancy Articles:

Paracetamol during pregnancy can inhibit masculinity
Paracetamol during pregnancy can inhibit masculinity Paracetamol during pregnancy can inhibit the development of 'male behavior' in mice.
The cost of opioid use during pregnancy
A new study published today by the scientific journal Addiction reveals that the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome -- often caused by mothers using opioids during pregnancy -- is increasing in the United States, and carries an enormous burden in terms of hospital days and costs.
New study: Pre-pregnancy BMI directly linked to excess pregnancy weight gain
It's well known that excessive weight gain during pregnancy can have a lasting negative impact on the health of a mother and her baby.
Pregnancy-specific β1-glycoproteins
Development of new strategies and novel drug design to treat trophoblastic diseases and to provide pregnancy success are of crucial importance in maintenance the female reproductive health.
Should hypothyroidism in pregnancy be treated?
When a woman becomes pregnant, many changes occur in her body.
Pre-pregnancy progesterone helps women with recurrent pregnancy loss
Women who have had two or more unexplained miscarriages can benefit from natural progesterone treatment before pregnancy, a new a study from the University of Illinois at Chicago shows.
Male pipefish pregnancy, it's complicated
In the upside-down world of the pipefish, sexual selection appears to work in reverse, with flashy females battling for males who bear the pregnancy and carry their young to term in their brood pouch.
Pregnancy leads to changes in the mother's brain
A study directed by researchers from the UAB and IMIM are the first to reveal how pregnancy causes long-lasting alterations in brain structure, probably related to improving the mother's ability to protect and interact with the child.
MRIs during pregnancy and outcomes for infants, children
In an analysis that included more than 1.4 million births, exposure to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during the first trimester of pregnancy compared with nonexposure was not associated with increased risk of harm to the fetus or in early childhood, although gadolinium MRI at any time during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of a broad set of rheumatological, inflammatory, or skin conditions and, possibly, for stillbirth or neonatal death, according to a study appearing in the Sept.
The benefits of exercise during pregnancy
Women who exercise during pregnancy are more likely to deliver vaginally than those who do not, and show no greater risk of preterm birth.

Related Pregnancy Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Moving Forward
When the life you've built slips out of your grasp, you're often told it's best to move on. But is that true? Instead of forgetting the past, TED speakers describe how we can move forward with it. Guests include writers Nora McInerny and Suleika Jaouad, and human rights advocate Lindy Lou Isonhood.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#527 Honey I CRISPR'd the Kids
This week we're coming to you from Awesome Con in Washington, D.C. There, host Bethany Brookshire led a panel of three amazing guests to talk about the promise and perils of CRISPR, and what happens now that CRISPR babies have (maybe?) been born. Featuring science writer Tina Saey, molecular biologist Anne Simon, and bioethicist Alan Regenberg. A Nobel Prize winner argues banning CRISPR babies won’t work Geneticists push for a 5-year global ban on gene-edited babies A CRISPR spin-off causes unintended typos in DNA News of the first gene-edited babies ignited a firestorm The researcher who created CRISPR twins defends...