Study finds that school-funding loopholes leave poor children behind

August 18, 2005

The nation's main program for educating the disadvantaged, Title I, is hampered by loopholes that prevent it from fulfilling its mission, according to a new study.

The $13 billion Title I program, now the major funding arm of President Bush's No Child Left Behind act, must close the loopholes if it is to ensure that school districts channel the money to needy schools, said lead author Marguerite Roza, a research assistant professor at the University of Washington's Evans School of Public Affairs.

The new research documents how current rules allow the federal funds intended for low-income schools to be shifted - sometimes inadvertently - to affluent schools within the same district.

"In some places," Roza said, "taxpayer money intended to help overcome the effects of poverty is actually diverted to schools in the wealthiest neighborhoods."

This stems from a practice that was scrutinized by Roza and her colleagues at the university's Center on Reinventing Public Education. In almost every school district, experienced teachers are not only far better-paid than novice teachers, but they are far more likely to work in wealthier parts of town.

However, district accounting practices typically fail to show this hidden subsidy for affluent students. Instead, most districts count costs as if salaries were the same in every school.

In the real world, the study shows, this means poor children get shortchanged. When Houston's actual teacher salaries are factored in, for example, low-income schools there get $472 less per student in non-targeted state and local funds than the district average.

Thus, the study found that despite Title I language requiring that the aid reach schools in impoverished neighborhoods, in practice the grant flows into district funding systems favoring the rich.

These findings led to two basic recommendations that the researchers say could strengthen Title I to better serve disadvantaged children and help it achieve the mission set forth during President Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty four decades ago:

  • Require districts to account for salary differences between schools. Districts are currently allowed to average the salaries.
  • Require districts to provide equitable resources, in actual dollars, to each school before Title I funds are brought to bear.

    These reforms, according to the 20-page report, would not only improve the distribution of the $13 billion annually spent on Title I, but also would start to leverage a more fair and effective distribution of the rest of the nation's $455 billion in annual school spending.

    "This research documents that school districts systematically discriminate against high-poverty schools in their budgeting policies," said Ross Wiener, policy director of the Education Trust, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization in Washington, D.C., that focuses on closing achievement gaps in public education. "As a matter of simple justice, Congress should close the loopholes in federal law that allow these practices to persist."

    The next major opportunity to revise the federal rules could come in 2007, when Title I is due for reauthorization by Congress. In the meantime, a House Appropriations subcommittee earlier this year drafted language asking Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings to study how Title I and district funds intermingle.

    Collaborating on the report were Center on Reinventing Public Education researchers Larry Miller and Paul Hill. The study was funded in part by the Annie E. Casey Foundation and Atlantic Philanthropies.

    "This study," Roza said, "is an opportunity to show how the core principles of Title I can be rescued."
    -end-


    University of Washington

    Related Money Articles from Brightsurf:

    The secretive networks used to move money offshore
    The researchers at USC have made some discoveries about the network behind the Panama Papers, uncovering uniquely fragmented network behavior and transactions.

    Leaving money on the table to stay in the game
    Unlike businesses or governments, organisms can't go into evolutionary debt -- there is no borrowing one's way back from extinction.

    Money can't buy love -- or friendship
    While researchers have suggested that individuals who base their self-worth on their financial success often feel lonely in everyday life, a newly published study by the University at Buffalo and Harvard Business School has taken initial steps to better understand why this link exists.

    More taxpayers' money for the environment and public benefit
    Over 3,600 scientists from across Europe call for effective action from the EU regarding its Common Agricultural Policy.

    When money is scarce, biased behavior happens faster
    Discrimination may happen faster than the blink of an eye, especially during periods of economic scarcity, according to a new study from Cornell University.

    More money, more gabapentin
    Pharmaceutical companies' payments to doctors may be influencing them to prescribe more expensive, brand-name versions of the pain drug gabapentin, a team of researchers report in the July 8, 2019 issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, and the increasing use of the drug suggests it may be being abused. 

    Why money cannot 'buy' housework
    If a man is handy with the vacuum cleaner, isn't averse to rustling up a lush family meal most nights after he's put on the washing machine having popped into the supermarket on his way home then it's more than likely his partner will have her own bank account.

    How information is like snacks, money, and drugs -- to your brain
    A new study by researchers at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business has found that information acts on the brain's dopamine-producing reward system in the same way as money or food.

    Ultra-secure form of virtual money proposed
    A new type of money that allows users to make decisions based on information arriving at different locations and times, and that could also protect against attacks from quantum computers, has been proposed by a researcher at the University of Cambridge.

    Time is money, especially when it comes to giving
    Would you be more likely to donate to charity if you could report the gift sooner on your taxes?

    Read More: Money News and Money Current Events
  • Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.