Wound infections cheaper than we thought

August 23, 2006

The cost of infections post surgery and that first appear after a patient's discharge from hospital is 50 times less than previously estimated, according to a study by Queensland University of Technology.

Dr Nicholas Graves, from QUT's Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, said the true cost of surgical infections post hospital discharge was just $74 - not the thousands other studies have suggested.

The findings of his study were published in the prestigious US journal Emerging Infectious Diseases titled Costs of Surgical Site Infections that appear after hospital discharge.

"Our study found that postdischarge surgical infections caused much lower costs than previously thought, even when costs are viewed from a societal perspective," Dr Graves said.

"This study contradicts other studies which have found the economic cost of a case of a surgical site infection after hospital discharge was almost 50-fold the estimate we have reported.

"Up until now little has been known of the costs of postdischarge wound infections but studies suggest that they are large with health services and patients incurring costs and subsequent production losses."

The study looked at 449 patients who underwent surgery.

"Of these 449 patients, 38 were diagnosed with a surgical site infection or wound infection that appeared after their release from hospital."

He said when taking into account the cost of health care services, work losses and outof- pocket expenses by the patient, the cost of infection was $74.

"We arrived at this figure by using statistical techniques to estimate how much a postdischarge wound infection contributed to these costs, while controlling the effects of other factors that also cause costs," he said.

Dr Graves said previous studies failed to zero in on this statistical information, thereby adding costs which would otherwise be attributed to the normal healing of a patient post surgery.

"Basically we included more control variables in our statistical equations and so explained more of the variation in cost outcomes.

"This reduced the amount of costs attributed to wound infections."

Dr Graves said there was a need to understand the true cost of surgical site infections so that policy makers could accurately predict the cost savings from prevention programs.

"This information will enable good quality infection-control decisions to be made," he said.

"Biased estimates of cost savings will lead to poor decision making about infection control."
-end-
**A high resolution head shot of Dr. Graves is available for media use**

Research Australia

Related Infection Articles from Brightsurf:

Halving the risk of infection following surgery
New analysis by the University of Leeds and the University of Bern of more than 14,000 operations has found that using alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) halves the risk of infection in certain types of surgery when compared to the more commonly used povidone-iodine (PVI).

How plants shut the door on infection
A new study by an international team including University of Maryland scientists has discovered the key calcium channel responsible for closing plant pores as an immune response to pathogen exposure.

Sensing infection, suppressing regeneration
UIC researchers describe an enzyme that blocks the ability of blood vessel cells to self-heal.

Boost to lung immunity following infection
The strength of the immune system in response to respiratory infections is constantly changing, depending on the history of previous, unrelated infections, according to new research from the Crick.

Is infection after surgery associated with increased long-term risk of infection, death?
Whether experiencing an infection within the first 30 days after surgery is associated with an increased risk of another infection and death within one year was the focus of this observational study that included about 660,000 veterans who underwent major surgery.

Revealed: How E. coli knows how to cause the worst possible infection
The discovery could one day let doctors prevent the infection by allowing E. coli to pass harmlessly through the body.

UK study shows most patients with suspected urinary tract infection and treated with antibiotics actually lack evidence of this infection
New research presented at this week's European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) in Amsterdam, Netherlands (April 13-16, 2019) shows that only one third of patients that enter the emergency department with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) actually have evidence of this infection, yet almost all are treated with antibiotics, unnecessarily driving the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.

Bacteria in urine doesn't always indicate infection
Doctors should think carefully before testing patients for a urinary tract infection (UTI) to avoid over-diagnosis and unnecessary antibiotic treatment, according to updated asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) guidelines released by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and published in Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Subsidies for infection control to healthcare institutions help reduce infection levels
Researchers compared three types of infection control subsidies and found that under a limited budget, a dollar-for-dollar matching subsidy, in which policymakers match hospital spending for infection control measures, was the most effective at reducing the number of hospital-acquired infections.

Dengue virus infection may cause severe outcomes following Zika virus infection during pregnancy
This study is the first to report a possible mechanism for the enhancement of Zika virus progression during pregnancy in an animal model.

Read More: Infection News and Infection Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.