Disparity in wealth is killing democracy, scholar warns

August 27, 2003

As Americans begin to tune into another presidential campaign season, they might assume that democracy is alive and well.

But one scholar argues that representative democracy is effectively dead - done in by the biggest shift of income and assets to the super-wealthy since the 1920s.

"President Bush's tax cuts increased the political power of the richest Americans," says Walter Williams, University of Washington professor emeritus of public affairs. "Their gains fueled the huge increase in campaign contributions and made big money the driving force in national politics."

Williams argues in a paper to be presented Saturday at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association in Philadelphia that this "massive maldistribution" of wealth has severely weakened U.S. political institutions and democracy.

The trend, Williams said, traces back to President Reagan, who sold a political philosophy blending antigovernmentism, deregulation and tax cuts for the most affluent. "Reaganism" continued to prevail even under the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton, who in essence "ratified" the philosophy by not repudiating it.

Clinton's successor, George W. Bush, is described by Williams as "the foremost disciple of Reaganism."

In his conference paper and forthcoming book "Reaganism and the Death of Representative Democracy," Williams documents what he describes as epic shifts in wealth during the two decades of Reaganism - for example, that the top 1 percent saw their after-tax incomes rise 157 percent in real dollars, while the real incomes of the bottom 20 percent of the population actually fell.

By contrast, he writes, during the postwar years to 1973, blue-collar incomes posted the biggest gains and the ranks of the American middle class swelled.

Today's rising inequality, Williams argues, distorts the political system and turns ordinary Americans into second-class citizens. Wealthy individuals and major corporations have returned the favor of tax cuts and deregulation with a flood of contributions that give Bush a commanding lead for the 2004 campaign - which Williams describes as a key battle to maintain the plutocracy.

"By the time you or I get into the act," Williams said, "the candidates are pretty much served up for us by the wealthy interests."

Williams, who is an emeritus professor at the UW's Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, will present his paper Saturday at the conference's 10 a.m. session on the political and policymaking implications of wealth inequality.

Also at that session, UW political scientist Mark A. Smith will document the emergence of conservative intellectuals and their growing influence in American life. Smith shows that the right, which once lacked an infrastructure to support intellectual work, has created and sustained an increasingly large network of publications, networks and institutions. A growing array of political magazines since World War II has allowed conservatives to express intellectually coherent principles and programs, Smith argues, and the founding and growth of think tanks increased the reach of those ideas.

According to Smith's paper, the influence of academia - where most professors identify themselves as liberals - does not fully offset the right's edge in the domain of think tanks. That is because researchers at think tanks strive for influence over policymakers and the public sphere, whereas academics are rewarded for contributing to specialized knowledge within their disciplines.
For more information during the conference, contact Williams in Philadelphia on his cell phone at 206-849-9744 or at The Alexander Inn 215-923-3535. In Seattle, he can be reached at 206-322-4197 or wwms@u.washington.edu. Smith can be reached in Philadelphia on his cell 206-235-1882, or in Seattle at 206-368-8431 or masmith@u.washington.edu. The papers, and more information about the conference, are available at www.apsanet.org/mtgs/program. For a review copy of "Reaganism and the Death of Representative Democracy," contact Gina Armento of Georgetown University Press at 202-687-9856 or gla2@georgetown.edu.

University of Washington

Related Democracy Articles from Brightsurf:

Game 'pre-bunks' political misinformation by letting players undermine democracy
An online game helps ''inoculate'' players against fake news by showing them how political misinformation is created and circulated.

Democracy: Millennials are the most disillusioned generation 'in living memory' - global study
Globally, millennials are most dissatisfied with democracy, and more so than previous generations were when under 35.

Special Issue - Democracy: In Flux and Under Threat
In this special issue of Science, a series of Insights pieces examines the current state of democracy worldwide.

Paper ballots, risk-limiting audits can help defend elections and democracy, study finds
With just over two months before the 2020 election, three professors at the Indiana University Kelley School of Business offer a comprehensive review of how other nations are seeking to protect their democratic institutions and presents how a multifaceted, targeted approach is needed to achieve that goal in the U.S., where intelligence officials have warned that Russia and other rivals are again attempting to undermine our democracy.

OECD countries' politicians follow each other
The more democratic a country is, the greater the probability that its politicians decide in the same way as in neighbouring countries, without further analysis.

Do democracies behave differently from non-democracies when it comes to foreign policy?
The question of whether democracies behave differently from non-democracies is a central, and intense, debate in the field of international relations.

Perception of US democracy tanks after Trump impeachment
While President Donald Trump's impeachment gripped the country, the long-term consequences of his trial and acquittal for American democracy remain yet unclear.

Territorial short food supply chains foster food democracy and sustainability
A University of Cordoba study analyzed the governance mechanisms in territorial short food supply chains in Córdoba and Bogotá.

Secularism and tolerance of minority groups predicts future prosperity of countries
Secular cultures which are tolerant of minority groups and respectful of individuals' rights tend to have more wealth, education and democracy, a new study by University of Bristol scientists has found.

A new learning model to enhance citizen participation
How to teach citizens to become active members of the society?

Read More: Democracy News and Democracy Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.