UPenn surgery for cancer-ridden lungs

September 04, 2000

Penn surgeons perform -- and teach -- a once-rare procedure: saving clear portions of cancer-ridden lungs when even a main pulmonary artery is involved in malignancy

Procedure has lower risk and leaves patients with more stamina than complete removal of the lung

When a surgeon opens the chest of a lung cancer patient and finds that the malignancy has spread from one of the lungs to its pulmonary artery, he or she will almost always remove the entire lung.

But doctors at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center are performing and teaching a surgical procedure that routinely saves part of the affected lung, leaving the patient with more stamina, the potential for normal activity, and the same long-term prognisis.

In fact, when a lung is removed in its entirety, "there is a much greater risk of death after surgery, and certainly more shortness of breath permanently," according to Joseph B. Shrager, MD, PhD, a thoracic surgeon and assistant professor of surgery at the University of Pennsylvania Medical School.

Even though there has been scattered anecdotal evidence (and one other large published study) since the late 1960s that indicate the advantages of the lung-sparing procedure, which is described in medical terminology as a "lobectomy with tangential pulmonary artery resection," very few doctors have been willing to attempt it.

"Ninety-five percent of surgeons who operate for lung cancer are not comfortable with the procedure," said Shrager. "They're afraid of bleeding, and they feel it's too great a technical risk."

But since 1992, Penn's thoracic surgeons, led by Dr. Larry Kaiser, have successfully performed about 40 of the surgeries. They've found, according to Shrager, that "in most cases the procedure is only slightly more difficult than removing the entire lung."

A report of the team's findings based on the first 33 cases was published this summer in the Annals of Thoracic Surgery, and earlier this year, Shrager presented the results of those cases at the meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

Decision-making in the operating room

In lung cancer, it can take from six months to two years before a malignant tumor is detected. Surgery is a viable treatment only in cases where a non-small-cell malignancy has not yet spread from the lung to the brain, bones, liver or adrenal glands. (Small cell carcinomas are most commonly treated with only radiation and chemotherapy.)

But when surgery is the clear course, even using the most sophisticated medical technology, a doctor still often cannot be sure before opening a patient's chest whether there is involvement of the pulmonary artery.

"We'll tell people, 'We take out only as much as we need to,'" Shrager said.

And so the final choice between a traditional pneumonectomy - the complete removal of the affected lung -- or an attempt to save part of the lung, is one that must be made on the floor of the operating room.

The delicate work of arterial resection

The most daunting part of the combined lobectomy/resection procedure is the pulmonary artery resection: The wall of the artery that is overgrown with malignancy is removed, and then the artery is stitched back together.

But the thoracic surgeons at Penn have found the surgery only slightly more challenging than traditional lung cancer surgery.

"Typically when we're doing the procedure it's a left upper lobe cancer and the tumor is growing into the pulmonary artery," Shrager said. "As long as it's not extensively growing into the artery, basically we clamp the pulmonary artery above and below where the tumor is invading, and then cut out only the side wall of the artery where the tumor is attached, causing a tangential incision, and then repair the artery."

"This is something that can easily be taught," Shrager said. "And it's something we hope to see become a standard procedure, whenever possible. The value of the technique is that patients who undergo this surgery appear to have the same chance of being cured of the cancer as those undergoing complete lung removal, but they will not experience any diminishment in the quality of their life."
-end-


University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Related Lung Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

State-level lung cancer screening rates not aligned with lung cancer burden in the US
A new study reports that state-level lung cancer screening rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden.

The lung microbiome may affect lung cancer pathogenesis and prognosis
Enrichment of the lungs with oral commensal microbes was associated with advanced stage disease, worse prognosis, and tumor progression in patients with lung cancer, according to results from a study published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

New analysis finds lung cancer screening reduces rates of lung cancer-specific death
Low-dose CT screening methods may prevent one death per 250 at-risk adults screened, according to a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled clinical trials of lung cancer screening.

'Social smokers' face disproportionate risk of death from lung disease and lung cancer
'Social smokers' are more than twice as likely to die of lung disease and more than eight times as likely to die of lung cancer than non-smokers, according to research presented at the European Respiratory Society International Congress.

Lung cancer therapy may improve outcomes of metastatic brain cancer
A medication commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer that has spread, or metastasized, may have benefits for patients with metastatic brain cancers, suggests a new review and analysis led by researchers at St.

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.

Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.

Lung transplant patients face elevated lung cancer risk
In an American Journal of Transplantation study, lung cancer risk was increased after lung transplantation, especially in the native (non-transplanted) lung of single lung transplant recipients.

Proposed cancer treatment may boost lung cancer stem cells, study warns
Epigenetic therapies -- targeting enzymes that alter what genes are turned on or off in a cell -- are of growing interest in the cancer field as a way of making a cancer less aggressive or less malignant.

Are you at risk for lung cancer?
This question isn't only for people who've smoked a lot.

Read More: Lung Cancer News and Lung Cancer Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.