Nav: Home

Slow Earthquakes Seen As Complex As Regular Earthquakes

September 05, 1996

In December 1992, two borehole strainmeter devices located close to the San Andreas Fault picked up a series of deformation signals that the instruments, deployed in 1984, had never before detected. The signals, which lasted for about a week, were from a "slow" earthquake. Slow earthquakes release their strain energy much more slowly than do regular earthquakes and are usually more difficult to detect. Accompanying the slow quake was a series of small regular earthquakes.

The analysis of the San Andreas event, reported in this week's issue of Nature, has yielded a surprisingly complex picture of the slow process; in the few cases previously reported, the slow rupture appeared to be rather simple. Carnegie's Alan Linde and colleagues* report that the slow 1992 quake had a total displacement across its rupture surface of only a few centimeters but was slower by two orders of magnitudes than any previously detected slow event. Its complexity, they write, was comparable to that of a regular earthquake.

The borehole strainmeters which picked up the slow earthquake signals are located near the transition between locked and stably sliding segments of the San Andreas Fault in central California. (In stably sliding faults, slip usually occurs through creep and small earthquakes. Locked faults often produce large ruptures; the 1906 San Francisco earthquake occurred in the locked partion of the San Andreas to the north of the study area.) The slow strain changes extended over 30 square km (about 11 square miles) of fault surface area with a total strain rupture corresponding to a magnitude 4.8 earthquake. They included a series of slow events with several episodes of varying slip time. Depth ranged from 0.1 km to at least 4 km, and perhaps as much as 8 km. The small regular earthquakes accompanying the slow earthquake sequence were each no larger than magnitude 3.7.

Together with previous slow earthquake analyses, this new work suggests that a relation exists between the amount of slow redistribution of stress and the size of associated earthquakes. For example, a slow earthquake preceding the great 9.5-magnitude Chilean earthquake of 1960 was very large in extent and had a slip of several meters. A 1978 slow event in Japan had a slip of about one meter and was followed by earthquakes as large as magnitude 5.8. The 1992 California event, displacing only a few centimeters, was accompanied by very small earthquakes.

What this means for understanding the earthquake process is not clear. Several scientists, among them Linde and his colleagues at Carnegie's Department of Terrestrial Magnetism in Washington, D.C., have previously suggested that slow earthquakes are an integral part of the seismic faulting process. Such events, they say, may be important in earthquake nucleation, i.e., they may act as triggers in initiating the process leading to normal earthquakes. Or, they may account for the excess of plate convergence over seismic slip in subduction zones. (The rate at which two plates converge is often greater than the detected rate of seismic slip; therefore, some other mechanism, such as a slow earthquake, must account for the difference.) This particular slow earthquake, located where locked and stably sliding segments of the San Andreas join, may have some bearing on the nature of such fault transitions.

However, it is not easy to detect slow earthquakes. Because rupture takes place slowly, seismic waves are not generated. Thus, the usual techniques for detecting earthquakes (with seismometers) are not available. Additionally, the total surface displacements of slow quakes are often too small to be seen by conventional distance measuring techniques, such as the satellite- based Global Positioning System. As well, the signal amplitudes of slow earthquakes decrease rapidly with increasing distance from the source. With only a few arrays of instruments like borehole strainmeters sensitive enough to detect them, progress in determining their role in the seismogenic process is likely to be slow.


Research in seismology has been a part of the Carnegie Institution's Department of Terrestrial Magnetism for decades. DTM scientists, for example, helped develop the Sacks-Evertson borehole strainmeter, in which a hydraulic amplification system permits detection of extremely small changes in rock strain. A Sacks-Evertson strainmeter was one of the two instruments used in this study. (The other was a Gladwin tensor strainmeter.) Both instruments are cemented under compression into subsurface rock, typically 200 km deep.

DTM, led by Sean Solomon, is one of five research arms of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, a nonprofit scientific and educational organization founded by Andrew Carnegie in 1902. The president of the Institution is the biologist Maxine Singer.

*The authors of the Nature paper are Alan T. Linde of DTM, Michael T. Gladwin and Ross L. Gwyther, both of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Queensland Center for Advanced Technologies, Australia; Malcolm J. S. Johnston, USGS, Menlo Park, CA; and Roger G. Bilham, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Carnegie Institution for Science

Related Earthquake Articles:

From where will the next big earthquake hit the city of Istanbul?
Scientists reckon with an earthquake with a magnitude of 7 or greater in this region in the coming years.
Dissection of the 2015 Bonin deep earthquake
Researchers at Tohoku University's Department of Geophysics, have been studying the deep earthquake which occurred on May 30, 2015, to the west of Japan's Bonin Islands.
The search for the earthquake nucleus
Where a tectonic plate dives under another, in the so-called subduction zones at ocean margins, many strong earthquakes occur.
Better understanding post-earthquake fault movement
Preparation and good timing enabled Gareth Funning and a team of researchers to collect a unique data set following the 2014 South Napa earthquake that showed different parts of the fault, sometimes only a few kilometers apart, moved at different speeds and at different times.
The maximum earthquake magnitude for North Turkey
The Istanbul metropolitan region faces a high probability for a large earthquake in the near future.
Double dose of bad earthquake news
A team of researchers, including one from the University of California, Riverside, has discovered that earthquake ruptures can jump much further than previously thought, a finding that could have severe implications on the Los Angeles area and other regions in the world.
Discovery of hidden earthquake presents challenge to earthquake early-warning systems
Seismologists at the University of Liverpool studying the 2011 Chile earthquake have discovered a previously undetected earthquake which took place seconds after the initial rupture.
Babe Ruth and earthquake hazard maps
Northwestern University researchers have turned to an unusual source -- Major League Baseball -- to help learn why maps used to predict shaking in future earthquakes often do poorly.
Earthquake rupture halted by seamounts
Experts expected for some time that one of the next mega earthquakes occurs off northern Chile.
Catastrophic landslides post-earthquake
In the last few months, it has once more become clear that large earthquakes can solicit catastrophic landsliding.

Related Earthquake Reading:

Quakeland: On the Road to America's Next Devastating Earthquake
by Kathryn Miles (Author)

Earthquakes (Let's-Read-and-Find-Out Science 2)
by Dr. Franklyn M. Branley (Author), Megan Lloyd (Illustrator)

Earthquakes (True Books: Earth Science (Paperback))
by Ker Than (Author)

Earthquakes
by Seymour Simon (Author)

I Survived the San Francisco Earthquake, 1906 (I Survived #5)
by Lauren Tarshis (Author), Scott Dawson (Illustrator)

The Great Quake: How the Biggest Earthquake in North America Changed Our Understanding of the Planet
by Henry Fountain (Author)

National Geographic Kids Everything Volcanoes and Earthquakes: Earthshaking photos, facts, and fun!
by Kathy Furgang (Author)

Earthquake Terror (Puffin Novel)
by Peg Kehret (Author)

Earthquakes! (TIME FOR KIDS Nonfiction Readers)
by Teacher Created Materials (Author)

Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering Design (Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering)
by Michele Maugeri (Editor), Claudio Soccodato (Editor)

Best Science Podcasts 2018

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2018. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

The Story Behind The Numbers
Is life today better than ever before? Does the data bear that out? This hour, TED speakers explore the stories we tell with numbers — and whether those stories portray the full picture. Guests include psychologist Steven Pinker, economists Tyler Cowen and Michael Green, journalist Hanna Rosin, and environmental activist Paul Gilding.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#486 Volcanoes
This week we're talking volcanoes. Because there are few things that fascinate us more than the amazing, unstoppable power of an erupting volcano. First, Jessica Johnson takes us through the latest activity from the Kilauea volcano in Hawaii to help us understand what's happening with this headline-grabbing volcano. And Janine Krippner joins us to highlight some of the lesser-known volcanoes that can be found in the USA, the different kinds of eruptions we might one day see at them, and how damaging they have the potential to be. Related links: Kilauea status report at USGS A beginner's guide to Hawaii's otherworldly...