Two-thirds of meta-analyses in the critical care literature are of poor quality

September 08, 2005

More than two thirds of meta-analyses available to critical care physicians have major methodological flaws and cannot be reliably used to guide clinical practice. Research published today in Critical Care concludes that the overall quality of meta-analyses in this field is poor, but has improved over time, possibly due to the publication of the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses statement (QUOROM) in 1999.

Anthony Delaney from the Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia, Chip Doig, from the University of Calgary, Canada, and colleagues, studied 139 reports of meta-analyses addressing critical care topics published between January 1994 and December 2003. They assessed whether data from the reports met any of nine of the criteria listed in the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire(OQAQ), the only instrument available to researchers to grade the quality of articles. The reports were given an overall score on a scale of 1-to 7 according to the results of this assessment, with a score of 1 to 4 indicating major flaws in the meta-analysis and a score of 5 or more indicating only minimal or minor flaws.

Delaney et al.'s results show that 69% of the reports score below 4 and the average score was 3.3. The most common flaws were failure to report whether a comprehensive literature search was conducted and failure to report how bias in the inclusion of studies was avoided, with only 35% of studies fulfilling these criteria.

Before the QUOROM statement, the proportion of reports adequately reporting the validity of the studies included in the meta-analysis was 39%, but it increased to 52% after publication of the statement.

Delaney et al. found similar results in other areas such as emergency medicine, anaesthesia and general surgery.

Physicians view meta-analyses as a highly reliable resource. This study shows that critical care clinicians should carefully evaluate meta-analyses before considering applying the results of these studies in their clinical practice.
-end-
Article:
A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Meta-analyses in the Critical Care Literature.
Anthony Delaney, Sean M Bagshaw, Andre Ferland, Braden Manns, Kevin B Laupland, Christopher J Doig
Critical Care, 2005 9:R575-R582 (9 September 2005)

BioMed Central

Related Clinical Practice Articles from Brightsurf:

Immunotherapy for bowel cancer could change clinical practice
A large international trial involving UCL and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) has found that pembrolizumab, a form of immunotherapy, more than doubled the 'progression free survival' time of patients with a specific subtype of advanced bowel cancer, when compared with chemotherapy.

Ménière's disease: New clinical practice guideline
The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation published the Clinical Practice Guideline: Ménière's Disease today in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Endocrine Society updates osteoporosis Clinical Practice Guideline
The Endocrine Society today announced an update to its osteoporosis Clinical Practice Guideline to include recommendations for romosozumab, a new medication that was approved last year to treat postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture.

Clinical practice guideline approval process introduces potential conflicts of interest
A new study of the approval processes used by the 43 medical-specialty-society members of the Council of Medical Specialty Societies in the US to create evidence-based guidelines finds that most use an approval procedure that has the potential to undermine editorial independence of the guideline development committee.

Wilderness Medical Society issues important new clinical practice guidelines
The Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) has released new clinical practice guidelines in a supplement to Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, published by Elsevier.

New clinical practice guideline for complex ADHD in children and adolescents
New clinical guidelines call strongly for providing psychosocial supports for children and adolescents with complex attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Nosebleed (epistaxis): New clinical practice guideline
The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation published the Clinical Practice Guideline: Nosebleed (Epistaxis) today in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

New ATS Clinical Practice Guideline: Diagnosing fungal infections
The American Thoracic Society has published an official clinical guideline on laboratory diagnosis of fungal infections in pulmonary and critical care medicine in the Society's Aug.

Review of osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines finds majority lack patient values
Patients' voices are ignored all too often in osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines, say researchers, who reviewed 70 English-language guidelines around the world and found less than 40 percent included any mention of patients' beliefs, values or preferences (BVPs).

AASM publishes clinical practice guideline on use of PAP therapy for sleep apnea
A new clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) provides guidance to clinicians on the use of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults.

Read More: Clinical Practice News and Clinical Practice Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.