North American mammographers prone to more false positives, study finds

September 16, 2003

Community-based mammography screening programs in North America are yielding a higher percentage of abnormal mammograms than corresponding programs in other countries, but without any apparent benefit in terms of a higher cancer detection rate, according to a study in the September 17 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

"This finding suggests that many, if not most, of the presumptively abnormal mammographic interpretations in screening programs with high percentages of abnormal mammograms turn out to be false positives," say study leader Joann G. Elmore, M.D., of the Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, and her colleagues. False-positive mammograms can lead to unnecessary follow-up procedures (e.g., biopsies), higher medical costs, and anxiety for the patient.

Elmore and her colleagues analyzed data from 32 studies of community-based screening mammography programs to compare outcomes of mammographic readings between programs in North America and those in other countries. In each study, they looked at the percentage of mammograms considered abnormal, the percentage of women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and the percentage of women diagnosed with minimal disease.

The percentage of mammograms deemed abnormal by North American programs was 2 to 4 percentage points higher than it was in programs in other countries, even after adjusting for factors such as age of women screened and number of mammography readers for each examination (single vs. double). North American programs also reported a higher percentage of DCIS. However, a higher percentage of abnormal mammograms did not appear to be associated with a higher rate of breast cancers being diagnosed.

The authors stress caution in interpreting these findings. They explain that a number of factors may be contributing to the observed variation between North American programs and programs in other countries, including differences in the population of women screened, differences in the screening procedure, and differences in how countries define an abnormal mammogram. Malpractice concerns and financial incentives may also be contributing to the variation in mammography interpretations, they say.

"Currently, it is not possible to determine which features may be most responsible for the variability," the authors write, adding that "a better understanding of the sources of variability in mammography may lead to more effective screening programs that have a lower percentage of mammograms judged as abnormal without substantially lowering the cancer detection rate."
-end-
Contact: Susan Gregg-Hanson, University of Washington Harborview Medical Center, 206-731-6397, sghanson@u.washington.edu.

Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Koepsell TD, Desnick LM, D'Orsi CJ, Ransohoff DF. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1384-93.

Note: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is published by Oxford University Press and is not affiliated with the National Cancer Institute. Attribution to the Journal of the National Cancer Institute is requested in all news coverage.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Related Mammography Articles from Brightsurf:

AI tool improves breast cancer detection on mammography
Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance the performance of radiologists in reading breast cancer screening mammograms, according to a new study.

Mammography screening saves lives also in older age
Mammography, which is an x-ray picture of the breast, is efficient also for women over the age of 70.

Six-month follow-up appropriate for BI-RADS 3 findings on mammography
Women with mammographically detected breast lesions that are probably benign should have follow-up surveillance imaging at six months due to the small but not insignificant risk that the lesions are malignant, according to a new study.

Tomosynthesis outperforms digital mammography in five-year study
A new study has found that the advantages of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) over digital mammography (DM), including increased cancer detection and fewer false positive findings, are maintained over multiple years and rounds of screening.

More women in US receive 3D mammography but disparities remain
Use of 3D mammography, an advanced form of breast cancer screening, has risen rapidly in recent years, according to Yale researchers in a new study.

Managing architectural distortion on mammography based on MR enhancement
High negative predictive values (NPV) in mammography architectural distortion (AD) without ultrasonographic (US) correlate or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhancement suggests follow-up rather than biopsy may be safely performed, according to a study to be presented at the ARRS 2019 Annual Meeting, set for May 5-10 in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Older women benefit significantly when screened with 3D mammography
Mammography remains an effective method for breast cancer screening in women ages 65 and older, with the addition of a 3D technique called tomosynthesis improving screening performances even more, according to a new study.

3D mammography significantly reduces breast biopsy rates
The use of digital breast tomosynthesis, also known as 3D mammography, may significantly reduce the number of women who undergo breast biopsy for a non-cancerous lesion following an abnormal mammogram, according to a new study.

Digital mammography increases breast cancer detection
The shift from film to digital mammography increased the detection of breast cancer by 14 percent overall in the United Kingdom without increasing the recall rate, according to a major new study.

New study supports mammography screening at 30 for some women
A new, large-scale study of more than 5 million mammograms found that annual mammography screening beginning at age 30 may benefit women with at least one of three specific risk factors: dense breasts, a personal history of breast cancer or a family history of breast cancer.

Read More: Mammography News and Mammography Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.