Nav: Home

Report: Cancer remains leading cause of death in US Hispanics

September 16, 2015

ATLANTA -September 16, 2015- While cancer is the second leading cause of death overall in the United States, it remains the leading cause of death among U.S. Hispanics. The finding comes from "Cancer Statistics for Hispanics/Latinos," a comprehensive report produced every three years by the American Cancer Society and published in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

Hispanics/Latinos represent the largest racial/ethnic minority group in the United States, accounting for 17.4% of the total U.S. population in 2014. In 2015, 125,900 new cancer cases and 37,800 cancer deaths are expected among Hispanics/Latinos in the U.S.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death for Hispanic men, accounting for about one in six cancer deaths (17%). Based on the 2015 estimates, liver cancer is projected to surpass colorectal cancer as the second leading cause of cancer deaths among Hispanic men. Liver cancer incidence and death rates in Hispanic men and women are about double those in non-Hispanic whites.

Among Hispanic women, the leading cause of cancer death is breast cancer (16%), followed by lung and colorectal cancers. Lung cancer surpassed breast cancer as the leading cause of death among women overall in the U.S. in 1987. Lung cancer death rates in Hispanic women are 70% lower than those in non-Hispanic white women because of historically low smoking prevalence in Hispanic women. In 2014, 8% of Hispanic women smoked cigarettes compared to 17% of non-Hispanic white women.

Cancer death rates have been decreasing since 1995 in Hispanic men and since 1996 in Hispanic women, four years later than declines began in non-Hispanic whites. Cancer incidence rates among Hispanics/Latinos are dropping 2.4% per year in men and 0.5% per year in women, mirroring trends among non-Hispanic whites.

Overall, cancer incidence rates are 20% lower in Hispanics than in non-Hispanic whites and cancer death rates are 30% lower. This is mainly because Hispanics are less likely than non-Hispanic whites to be diagnosed with the four most common cancers (prostate, breast, lung, and colon). However, Hispanics have a higher risk of cancers associated with infectious agents, such as those of the stomach, liver, and cervix. For example, stomach and liver cancer incidence and death rates in Hispanics are double those in non-Hispanic whites.

The cancer profile of Hispanics/Latinos living in the U.S. is strikingly different from that for non-Hispanic whites and reflects the risk in countries of origin, particularly for more recent immigrants. For example, overall, death and incidence rates in Puerto Ricans and Cubans are more similar to those in non-Hispanic whites than in those of Mexican origin, who immigrated to the U.S. in large numbers more recently.

Hispanics are particularly vulnerable to cancer inequalities. They are generally less likely than non-Hispanic whites to be diagnosed at an early stage, especially for melanoma and female breast cancer. Although less access to high-quality care due to lower socioeconomic status contributes to this disparity, some studies have shown that Hispanics are at higher risk of advanced-stage disease even when socioeconomic status and health care access are similar.

"The growth in the population of U.S. residents of Hispanic origin is now driven primarily by births, not immigration, which will probably change the future cancer risk profile of this group" said Rebecca L. Siegel, MPH, director of surveillance information for the American Cancer Society and lead author of the report. "The second generation, born and raised in the U.S. and more intertwined in our lifestyle, including our diet, has higher cancer rates than first-generation immigrants, so we may see a higher cancer burden in this group in the future."

The authors say progress in cancer control in Hispanics/Latinos should include the use of culturally appropriate lay health advisors and patient navigators; targeted, community-based intervention programs to increase screening and vaccination and encourage healthy lifestyle behaviors; and further funding for research into cancer risk and prevention among specific subgroups in this population.
Article: Cancer Statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2015, CA Cancer J Clin 2015; doi: 10.3322/caac.21314

Authors are: Rebecca L. Siegel, MPH; Stacey A. Fedewa, MPH; Kimberly D. Miller, MPH; Ann Goding-Sauer, MPH; and Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD, American Cancer Society; Paulo S. Pinheiro, MD, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, PhD; and Dinorah Martinez-Tyson, PhD, MPH, MA, University of South Florida.

American Cancer Society

Related Breast Cancer Articles:

Does MRI plus mammography improve detection of new breast cancer after breast conservation therapy?
A new article published by JAMA Oncology compares outcomes for combined mammography and MRI or ultrasonography screenings for new breast cancers in women who have previously undergone breast conservation surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer initially diagnosed at 50 or younger.
Blood test offers improved breast cancer detection tool to reduce use of breast biopsy
A Clinical Breast Cancer study demonstrates Videssa Breast can inform better next steps after abnormal mammogram results and potentially reduce biopsies up to 67 percent.
Surgery to remove unaffected breast in early breast cancer increases
The proportion of women in the United States undergoing surgery for early-stage breast cancer who have preventive mastectomy to remove the unaffected breast increased significantly in recent years, particularly among younger women, and varied substantially across states.
Breast cancer patients with dense breast tissue more likely to develop contralateral disease
Breast cancer patients with dense breast tissue have almost a two-fold increased risk of developing disease in the contralateral breast, according to new research from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer.
Some early breast cancer patients benefit more from breast conservation than from mastectomy
Breast conserving therapy (BCT) is better than mastectomy for patients with some types of early breast cancer, according to results from the largest study to date, presented at ECC2017.
One-third of breast cancer patients not getting appropriate breast imaging follow-up exam
An annual mammogram is recommended after treatment for breast cancer, but nearly one-third of women diagnosed with breast cancer aren't receiving this follow-up exam, according to new findings presented at the 2016 Annual Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons.
Low breast density worsens prognosis in breast cancer
Even though dense breast tissue is a risk factor for breast cancer, very low mammographic breast density is associated with a worse prognosis in breast cancer patients.
Is breast conserving therapy or mastectomy better for early breast cancer?
Young women with early breast cancer face a difficult choice about whether to opt for a mastectomy or breast conserving therapy (BCT).
Breast density and outcomes of supplemental breast cancer screening
In a study appearing in the April 26 issue of JAMA, Elizabeth A.
Full dose radiotherapy to whole breast may not be needed in early breast cancer
Five years after breast-conserving surgery, radiotherapy focused around the tumor bed is as good at preventing recurrence as irradiating the whole breast, with fewer side effects, researchers from the UK have found in the large IMPORT LOW trial.

Related Breast Cancer Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Moving Forward
When the life you've built slips out of your grasp, you're often told it's best to move on. But is that true? Instead of forgetting the past, TED speakers describe how we can move forward with it. Guests include writers Nora McInerny and Suleika Jaouad, and human rights advocate Lindy Lou Isonhood.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#527 Honey I CRISPR'd the Kids
This week we're coming to you from Awesome Con in Washington, D.C. There, host Bethany Brookshire led a panel of three amazing guests to talk about the promise and perils of CRISPR, and what happens now that CRISPR babies have (maybe?) been born. Featuring science writer Tina Saey, molecular biologist Anne Simon, and bioethicist Alan Regenberg. A Nobel Prize winner argues banning CRISPR babies won’t work Geneticists push for a 5-year global ban on gene-edited babies A CRISPR spin-off causes unintended typos in DNA News of the first gene-edited babies ignited a firestorm The researcher who created CRISPR twins defends...