Nav: Home

Cosmetic changes are equivalent after WBI vs PBI for women with early stage breast cancer

September 16, 2019

Results from the Quality of Life substudy of the NRG Oncology clinical trial NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 indicate that women rated post-lumpectomy partial breast irradiation (PBI) as equivalent to whole breast irradiation (WBI) in terms of cosmetic outcomes and satisfaction from baseline to three years following radiotherapy treatment. Treating physicians from the accruing site rated PBI as inferior to WBI while physicians who performed central review of digital photos blinded to treatment arm and time-point rated cosmetic outcome from PBI equivalent to WBI. These results were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) during the Plenary Session. The abstract was one of four abstracts chosen from over 3,000 submitted abstracts for the plenary session.

The initial results of this phase III trial were reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in 2018 and indicated that, although outcomes were close, PBI was not considered equivalent to WBI because the hazard ratio between treatment arms fell short of meeting statistical equivalence at 10 years following treatment. Due to the small differences in ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rates of less than 1% between trial arms, researchers determined that PBI treatment could still be beneficial for a portion of breast cancer patients undergoing lumpectomy for breast conservation.

"It is crucial that we provide breast cancer patients with the most up-to-date information possible as they are facing decisions about radiation treatment options for breast-conservation. Partial breast irradiation delivered over several days has the potential to reduce the time commitment, burden and healthcare costs associated with WBI. For those breast cancer patients that PBI and WBI result in similar cancer control, the appearance of the breast after treatment may be the key factor in selecting the radiation method they will pursue after lumpectomy. This affects thousands of breast cancer patients annually," stated Julia R. White, MD, of the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and the lead author of the NRG-NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 manuscript. "This substudy of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 was intended to address these questions regarding cosmetic outcome from PBI and WBI to inform patients and providers who are facing decisions about which radiotherapy method to choose following breast conserving surgery"

NRG Oncology's Quality of Life substudy of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 was designed to determine patient reported outcomes, and the focus this analysis is the cosmetic outcome between PBI and WBI treatments. Women were analyzed separately depending on whether they received chemotherapy or if they did not receive chemotherapy as a part of their treatment; with the primary focus of this presentation on the outcome of chemotherapy use groups combined. Of the 900 women that were analyzed from this trial, 420 of the women received chemotherapy and 480 women did not receive chemotherapy. Cosmetic outcome was measured by patient-rated global cosmetic score (GCS) and satisfaction, physician-rated GCS, and digital photos of the breasts, all collected from baseline through 1 year, and then 3 years following radiotherapy. The digital photos documenting cosmetic outcome at each time point were scored for GCS by central physician review blinded to treatment, breast treated, chemotherapy use, and time points.

The change in the Global Cosmetic Score over time in the PBI and WBI groups was examined using longitudinal mixed models controlling for chemo use (yes vs no), race (white vs. not white), age (continuous), axillary dissection (yes vs no), and the treatment by time point interaction. The patient-rated GCS, in the entire group, PBI was equivalent to WBI in cosmetic outcomes. From the Physicians at the accruing site rating GCS, PBI was worse than WBI at 36 months but change in GCS over time were equivalent. Cosmetic outcomes based on GCS rated by central review of digital photos by physicians blinded to treatment arm and time point indicated that PBI and WBI were equivalent.
-end-
This project was supported by grants U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC), and UG1CA189867 (NCORP) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Citation

White JR, Winter K, Cecchini RS, Vicini FA, Arthur D, Kuske R, Rabinovitch R, Sekhon A, Khan A, Chmura S, Shaitelman SF, McCormick B, Julian TB, Rogers CL, Bear HD, Petersen IA, Gustafson GS, Grossheim L, Mamounas EP, Ganz PA. (2019, September) Cosmetic Outcome from Post Lumpectomy Whole Breast Irradiation (WBI) Versus Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) on the NRG Oncology NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 Phase III Clinical Trial. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Chicago, IL.

About NRG Oncology

NRG Oncology conducts practice-changing, multi-institutional clinical and translational research to improve the lives of patients with cancer. Founded in 2012, NRG Oncology is a Pennsylvania-based nonprofit corporation that integrates the research of the legacy National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), and Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) programs. The research network seeks to carry out clinical trials with emphases on gender-specific malignancies, including gynecologic, breast, and prostate cancers, and on localized or locally advanced cancers of all types. NRG Oncology's extensive research organization comprises multidisciplinary investigators, including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, physicists, pathologists, and statisticians, and encompasses more than 1,300 research sites located world-wide with predominance in the United States and Canada. NRG Oncology is supported primarily through grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and is one of five research groups in the NCI's National Clinical Trials Network. http://www.nrgoncology.org

NRG Oncology

Related Chemotherapy Articles:

Less chemotherapy may have more benefit in rectal cancer
GI Cancers Symposium: Colorado study of 48 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, found that patients receiving lower-than-recommended doses in fact saw their tumors shrink more than patients receiving the full dose.
Male fertility after chemotherapy: New questions raised
Professor Delbès, who specializes in reproductive toxicology, conducted a pilot study in collaboration with oncologists and fertility specialists from the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) on a cohort of 13 patients, all survivors of pediatric leukemia and lymphoma.
'Combo' nanoplatforms for chemotherapy
In a paper to be published in the forthcoming issue in NANO, researchers from Harbin Institute of Technology, China have systematically discussed the recent progresses, current challenges and future perspectives of smart graphene-based nanoplatforms for synergistic tumor therapy and bio-imaging.
Nanotechnology improves chemotherapy delivery
Michigan State University scientists have invented a new way to monitor chemotherapy concentrations, which is more effective in keeping patients' treatments within the crucial therapeutic window.
Novel anti-cancer nanomedicine for efficient chemotherapy
Researchers have developed a new anti-cancer nanomedicine for targeted cancer chemotherapy.
Ending needless chemotherapy for breast cancer
A diagnostic test developed at The University of Queensland might soon determine if a breast cancer patient requires chemotherapy or would receive no benefit from this gruelling treatment.
A homing beacon for chemotherapy drugs
Killing tumor cells while sparing their normal counterparts is a central challenge of cancer chemotherapy.
Chemotherapy or not?
Case Western Reserve University researchers and partners, including a collaborator at Cleveland Clinic, are pushing the boundaries of how 'smart' diagnostic-imaging machines identify cancers -- and uncovering clues outside the tumor to tell whether a patient will respond well to chemotherapy.
Researchers use radiomics to predict who will benefit from chemotherapy
Using data from computed tomography (CT) images, researchers may be able to predict which lung cancer patients will respond to chemotherapy, according to a new study.
How drugs can minimize the side effects of chemotherapy
Researchers at the University of Zurich have determined the three-dimensional structure of the receptor that causes nausea and vomiting as a result of cancer chemotherapy.
More Chemotherapy News and Chemotherapy Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Teaching For Better Humans 2.0
More than test scores or good grades–what do kids need for the future? This hour, TED speakers explore how to help children grow into better humans, both during and after this time of crisis. Guests include educators Richard Culatta and Liz Kleinrock, psychologist Thomas Curran, and writer Jacqueline Woodson.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#556 The Power of Friendship
It's 2020 and times are tough. Maybe some of us are learning about social distancing the hard way. Maybe we just are all a little anxious. No matter what, we could probably use a friend. But what is a friend, exactly? And why do we need them so much? This week host Bethany Brookshire speaks with Lydia Denworth, author of the new book "Friendship: The Evolution, Biology, and Extraordinary Power of Life's Fundamental Bond". This episode is hosted by Bethany Brookshire, science writer from Science News.
Now Playing: Radiolab

Dispatch 3: Shared Immunity
More than a million people have caught Covid-19, and tens of thousands have died. But thousands more have survived and recovered. A week or so ago (aka, what feels like ten years in corona time) producer Molly Webster learned that many of those survivors possess a kind of superpower: antibodies trained to fight the virus. Not only that, they might be able to pass this power on to the people who are sick with corona, and still in the fight. Today we have the story of an experimental treatment that's popping up all over the country: convalescent plasma transfusion, a century-old procedure that some say may become one of our best weapons against this devastating, new disease.   If you have recovered from Covid-19 and want to donate plasma, national and local donation registries are gearing up to collect blood.  To sign up with the American Red Cross, a national organization that works in local communities, head here.  To find out more about the The National COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Project, which we spoke about in our episode, including information on clinical trials or plasma donation projects in your community, go here.  And if you are in the greater New York City area, and want to donate convalescent plasma, head over to the New York Blood Center to sign up. Or, register with specific NYC hospitals here.   If you are sick with Covid-19, and are interested in participating in a clinical trial, or are looking for a plasma donor match, check in with your local hospital, university, or blood center for more; you can also find more information on trials at The National COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Project. And lastly, Tatiana Prowell's tweet that tipped us off is here. This episode was reported by Molly Webster and produced by Pat Walters. Special thanks to Drs. Evan Bloch and Tim Byun, as well as the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.  Support Radiolab today at Radiolab.org/donate.