UCLA seeks thousands of current and former smokers for landmark lung cancer screening trial

September 18, 2002

Advances in imaging may allow physicians to detect smaller lung cancers than ever before. But does screening for lung cancer before symptoms appear using either conventional X-rays or the latest in imaging technology, such as low-dose spiral computerized tomography (CT), actually reduce lung cancer deaths?

On Sept. 18 researchers at UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center and nationwide are launching the National Lung Screening Trial to find out.

A joint study of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial, the National Lung Screening Trial is the largest clinical trial ever funded by the National Cancer Institute for lung cancer screening. Nationwide, the study seeks to enroll 50,000 healthy current or former smokers at risk of lung cancer. The trial is being conducted at UCLA and 29 other sites across the country, seeking to determine which screening test, chest X-ray or chest CT is more effective at reducing lung cancer deaths.

At UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center, the only California site presently offering the screening study, researchers hope to enroll 2,000 to 4,000 current and former smokers within the next 18 months.

"This is the first national trial of this scale designed to determine which screening test will better reduce lung cancer mortality," said Dr. Denise Aberle, the trial's national principal investigator, lead investigator at UCLA and a researcher at the Jonsson Cancer Center. "Our hope is that this study will lead to saving lives."

Lung cancer kills more Americans every year than breast, prostate, colon and pancreas cancers combined, and is responsible for about 28 percent of all cancer deaths in the United States. This year alone, more than 169,000 Americans will be diagnosed with lung cancer. Of those, 154,900 will die, according to the American Cancer Society. And yet, there is currently no standard approach to lung cancer screening, Aberle said.

Chest X-rays produce a two-dimensional view of the chest and can detect abnormalities the size of a quarter or smaller using radiation exposures that are among the lowest in medical imaging. With low-dose spiral CT, the patient moves on a table through a doughnut-shaped structure that acquires views from all angles. These views are combined to produce a three-dimensional image of the chest. With CT scanning, dime-sized abnormalities can be detected, although at somewhat higher levels of radiation.

"Right now, our understanding of lung cancer screening using either modality is incomplete," said Aberle, also a professor and vice-chairman of research in the Department of Radiological Sciences at UCLA.

The benefits of chest X-ray versus no screening at all are currently being studied in a separate part of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial.

Low-dose spiral CT is a newer approach to lung cancer screening, and has been lauded by some health professionals because of its ability to detect smaller lung lesions than conventional X-rays.

"But we don't know for sure that detecting a small lung cancer will actually reduce mortality from lung cancer," Aberle said. "Genetic and biological factors -- not merely tumor size -- determine whether a cancer spreads slowly or rapidly. Finding a small cancer on CT or chest X-ray is not necessarily the same as finding an early lung cancer."

And there's another wrinkle. Most of the lung abnormalities detected with low-dose CT are ultimately found to be non-cancerous, yet individuals with positive screening results are faced with additional tests and procedures that carry risks and have emotional consequences.

"At this time, we simply don't know whether using these technologies will do good or impose risk because of the medical interventions that follow," Aberle said.

The primary goal of the National Lung Screening Trial is to detect any differences in lung cancer deaths between those receiving chest X-rays and those receiving a CT scan. Study participants will be randomly assigned to either the chest X-ray group or the spiral CT group. Each volunteer will receive a baseline screening and two additional annual screenings using the same test, either X-ray or CT. All participants will be followed for an additional six to eight years at six- to 12-month intervals to watch for any changes in their health status.

"This study is important because there are more than 90 million current and former smokers in the U.S. at high risk for lung cancer. And death rates for this disease, unlike many other cancers, have not declined," said John Gohagan, a researcher in the National Cancer Institute's Division of Cancer Prevention and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer/National Lung Screening Trial project officer. "Cigarette smoking is by far the most important risk factor in the development of lung cancer."

Dr. Harmon Eyre, the American Cancer Society's chief medical officer and executive vice president for research and cancer control, underscored the importance of the study.

"Reducing lung cancer deaths is a high priority for us," Eyre said. "We are committed to helping the National Cancer Institute reach full enrollment in this study as soon as possible."

National Lung Screening Trial study volunteers will receive their screenings free. To qualify, volunteers need to meet these requirements: In addition to the lung cancer screening study, some of the sites, including UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center, also will be analyzing other critical measures of the effectiveness of lung cancer screening. These include the emotional and economic effects of screening and the impact of the screening process itself on smoking behaviors.

"These screening-related outcomes have not been systematically studied before and have important implications about the benefits of lung cancer screening as public policy," Aberle said.

Additionally, UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center and other study sites will collect and store samples of blood, urine and sputum from study participants. These samples will provide an important resource for testing biological markers of lung cancer that might someday serve as screening tests themselves or might better help identify those at risk of getting lung cancer.
-end-
For more information on the National Lung Screening Trial, please call the Jonsson Cancer Center's toll-free clinical trials hotline at (888) 798-0719 or the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service at (800) 4-CANCER.

For more information about UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center, its people and resources, visit our Web site at www.cancer.mednet.ucla.edu. For more information from the National Cancer Institute, visit www.cancer.gov/NLST.

University of California - Los Angeles

Related Lung Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

State-level lung cancer screening rates not aligned with lung cancer burden in the US
A new study reports that state-level lung cancer screening rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden.

The lung microbiome may affect lung cancer pathogenesis and prognosis
Enrichment of the lungs with oral commensal microbes was associated with advanced stage disease, worse prognosis, and tumor progression in patients with lung cancer, according to results from a study published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

New analysis finds lung cancer screening reduces rates of lung cancer-specific death
Low-dose CT screening methods may prevent one death per 250 at-risk adults screened, according to a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled clinical trials of lung cancer screening.

'Social smokers' face disproportionate risk of death from lung disease and lung cancer
'Social smokers' are more than twice as likely to die of lung disease and more than eight times as likely to die of lung cancer than non-smokers, according to research presented at the European Respiratory Society International Congress.

Lung cancer therapy may improve outcomes of metastatic brain cancer
A medication commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer that has spread, or metastasized, may have benefits for patients with metastatic brain cancers, suggests a new review and analysis led by researchers at St.

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.

Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.

Lung transplant patients face elevated lung cancer risk
In an American Journal of Transplantation study, lung cancer risk was increased after lung transplantation, especially in the native (non-transplanted) lung of single lung transplant recipients.

Proposed cancer treatment may boost lung cancer stem cells, study warns
Epigenetic therapies -- targeting enzymes that alter what genes are turned on or off in a cell -- are of growing interest in the cancer field as a way of making a cancer less aggressive or less malignant.

Are you at risk for lung cancer?
This question isn't only for people who've smoked a lot.

Read More: Lung Cancer News and Lung Cancer Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.