People are unlikely to withdraw consent for genetic research

September 19, 2002

People are unlikely to withdraw consent for genetic research even when samples were taken many years ago, research in this week's BMJ suggests.

In 1990 1583 randomly selected people in Sweden donated blood to a World Health Organisation project researching cardiovascular disorders and diabetes. Eleven years later, doctors sought their consent for genetic research, which was not possible when the samples were taken.

The remaining participants were asked whether their blood could be used for academic or commercial genetic research, provided that an ethics committee gave approval and samples were anonymised.

93% of the eligible participants gave their consent for both academic and commercial research. 2.2% refused and 4.8% did not reply or gave incomplete answers. Of those who gave consent 22.3% wanted to be informed about, and give consent for, each new genetic project. The rest gave general consent to genetic research as long as it was approved by an ethics committee. 2.5% of the participants did not give consent for their blood to be used for commercial research.

The authors conclude that people's readiness to contribute to genetic research is generally high. The results also demonstrate that it is feasible to obtain individual consent many years after blood was donated, and that consent is given nearly as often for commercial research as academic research.
-end-


BMJ

Related Genetic Research Articles from Brightsurf:

Yale team finds way to protect genetic privacy in research
In a new report, a team of Yale scientists has developed a way to protect people's private genetic information while preserving the benefits of a free exchange of functional genomics data between researchers.

Biomedical research may miss key information by ignoring genetic ancestry
A new study of Black residents of four distinct US cities reveals variations in genetic ancestry and social status that underscore the inadequacy of using skin color as a proxy for race in research.

Genetic doppelgaengers: Emory research provides insight into two neurological puzzles
Insight into the pathological mechanisms behind two devastating neurodegenerative diseases: the most common inherited form of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/ frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD) and spinocerebellar ataxia type 36 (SCA36).

Lupus study illustrates the importance of diversity in genetic research
Scientists at the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology have pinpointed epigenetic differences in the way lupus affects black women compared to other lupus patients, revealing important mechanics of the puzzling disease.

Quantifying Hispanic and Latinx populations' interest in genetic research participation
Researchers are increasingly prioritizing the need for diversity in genetics and genomics research.

New research uncovers how common genetic mutation drives cancer
A new, multicenter study led by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center determined how a single mutation in splicing factor 3b subunit 1 (SF3B1), the most frequently mutated splicing factor gene, drives the formation of many cancers.

Cancer research -- The genetic context is crucial
An Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) in Munich team has uncovered a mechanism behind the variability in the clinical course of Ewing sarcoma.

Scientists hope genetic research will lead to new breakthroughs in weed control
An article featured in the journal Weed Science sheds important new light on the genetics and potential control of Palmer amaranth and waterhemp - two troublesome Amaranthus species weeds that are resistant to multiple herbicides.

Research identifies genetic causes of poor sleep
The largest genetic study of its kind ever to use accelerometer data to examine how we slumber has uncovered a number of parts of our genetic code that could be responsible for causing poor sleep quality and duration.

Defining the responsibility to recontact research participants with new genetic findings
ASHG, along with several co-signing organizations, issued a position statement today outlining whether, and to what extent, there is a responsibility to recontact genetic and genomic research participants when new findings emerge that suggest their genetic information should be interpreted differently, which would allow participants to benefit from current genomics advances.

Read More: Genetic Research News and Genetic Research Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.