Researchers compose guidelines for handling CAR T cell side effects

September 19, 2017

HOUSTON -- Immune-cell based therapies opening a new frontier for cancer treatment carry unique, potentially lethal side effects that provide a new challenge for oncologists, one addressed by a team led by clinicians at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center with proposed guidelines for systematically dealing with the toxicities of these drugs.

Their work, published today in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, confronts the two main side effects of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, known as CAR T cells, white blood cells genetically engineered to strike cells with a specific target on their surface.

"CAR T cells provide an entirely new level of improved disease response among patients with certain blood cancers and hold promise for more wide-ranging use," said Elizabeth Shpall, M.D., deputy chair and professor of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy at MD Anderson.

"The algorithms that we published are conservative, detailed, and will help us save lives as we move forward with these exciting but also more toxic therapies," Shpall said.

The review covers wide-ranging research on CAR T therapies by many institutions and includes insights based on more than 100 patients treated at MD Anderson, Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center in Rochester, Minn.

Patients were treated by the co-authors with CAR T cells under development at four different companies for leukemias and lymphomas that attack white blood cells called B cells. They target CD19, a protein found on the surface of both malignant and normal B cells.

In clinical trials of CAR T for patients who have had all other treatments fail, response rates range from 50 to 90 percent.

"This represents a sea change in how we treat these patients," said lead author Sattva Neelapu, M.D., professor of Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma. "There have been no new treatments approved for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas relapsing after first line therapy in 30 years, and only about 10 percent survive long term."

"Existing second-line treatments, combination chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant when possible, take three to six months," Neelapu continued, "CAR T cell therapies take a few weeks."

"We need longer term follow up of patients treated so far in clinical trials, but these are potentially curative treatments," Neelapu said. "The toxicities are unique, and every member of the care team needs to be trained to recognize them and act accordingly."

Cytokine storms, brain stressors and safety

Two side effects have emerged during clinical trials that were previously uncommon to cancer treatments:

Both CRS and CRES are treatable, with early identification important to swift improvement. The review provides specific recommendations for pre-treatment preparation, monitoring of patients during and after CAR T infusion, identifying and staging emerging CRS and CRES, and tailored treatment of those side effects depending upon their severity.

New test for neurotoxicity

Researchers also developed a simple and fast method to flag development of neurotoxicity. The 10-point test asks a patient to name the year, month, city, hospital and president/prime minister of their home country (5 points), to name three nearby objects (3 points), write a standard sentence and count backward from 100 by tens.

A perfect score defines normal cognitive function. A patient has mild to severe impairment depending on the number of questions or activities missed.

For one patient treated for B cell lymphoma cited in the review, deterioration of her handwriting was the first sign of neurological impairment, which led to prompt intervention and reversal of the toxicity within hours.

Building on such insights, co-lead author Sudhakar Tummala, M.D., professor of Neuro-Oncology, led development of the neurological assessment, which they named CARTOX-10. An existing general method didn't effectively quantify the neurological effects caused by CAR T cell therapies.

They also tap the existing research published or presented about these therapies. For example, CAR T cell pioneer Carl June, M.D., and colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania, found abundant expression of interleukin-6 to be a driver of cytokine release syndrome. They successfully treated the first pediatric patient who suffered from CRS with IL-6 suppressors.

The review provides detailed guidance on how and when to use such drugs and other therapies for CRS and CRES.

Moon Shots Program™ support

Precise causes of these side effects are unknown and remain under investigation. Researchers also are trying to work out what factors allow strong responses in some patients, and resistance to treatment or relapse in others.

"While we all work on those issues, and learn how to better manage and harness these therapies, the CARTOX algorithms provide ground rules for patient safety," said Shpall, who holds the Howard and Lee Smith Chair in Cancer Research at MD Anderson.

The algorithms also will be applicable to other types of cell-based immunotherapy, including CAR natural killer cells, T cell receptor (TCR) engineered T cells, and combination drugs that use an antibody to connect T cells to targets on cancer cells, Shpall said.

The multi-institutional and multidisciplinary team formed for this research is called the CARTOX Working Group. Its research was funded by MD Anderson's Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CAO16672) from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and by philanthropic support for MD Anderson's Moon Shots Program™, designed to more rapidly develop life-saving advances based on scientific discoveries, to Neelapu through the B cell Lymphoma Moon Shot™.

Shpall is co-leader of the Moon Shots Program Adoptive Cell Therapy Platform™, which provides expertise and technology to support research in such treatment approaches.
-end-
MD Anderson and other co-authors have received funding to conduct clinical trials from pharmaceutical companies that are developing CAR T cell therapies. Neelapu has served as a consultant to Kite Pharma and Novartis. All such arrangements are managed under MD Anderson's conflict of interest policies.

Co-authors with Neelapu, Shpall and Tummala are: Partow Kebriaei, M.D., and Katy Rezvani, M.D., Ph.D., of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Biology; William Wierda, M.D., Nitin Jain, M.B.B.S., and Naval Daver, M.D., of Leukemia; Jason Westin, M.D., and Sherry Adkins, of Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma; Monica Loghin, M.D., and John de Groot, M.D., of Neuro-Oncology; Cristina Gutierrez, M.D., of Critical Care and Respiratory Care; Frederick Locke, M.D., Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Krishna Komanduri, M.D., of Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Yi Lin, M.D., Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Alison Gulbis, Division of Pharmacy at MD Anderson; Suzanne Davis and Patrick Hwu, M.D., Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson.

University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

Related Clinical Trials Articles from Brightsurf:

Nearly 1 in 5 cancer patients less likely to enroll in clinical trials during pandemic
A significant portion of cancer patients may be less likely to enroll in a clinical trial due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

COVID-19 clinical trials lack diversity
Despite disproportionately higher rates of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death among people of color, minority groups are significantly underrepresented in COVID-19 clinical trials.

Why we should trust registered clinical trials
In a time when we have to rely on clinical trials for COVID-19 drugs and vaccines, a new study brings good news about the credibility of registered clinical trials.

Inclusion of children in clinical trials of treatments for COVID-19
This Viewpoint discusses the exclusion of children from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clinical trials and why that could harm treatment options for children.

Review evaluates how AI could boost the success of clinical trials
In a review publishing July 17, 2019 in the journal Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, researchers examined how artificial intelligence (AI) could affect drug development in the coming decade.

Kidney patients are neglected in clinical trials
The exclusion of patients with kidney diseases from clinical trials remains an unsolved problem that hinders optimal care of these patients.

Clinical trials beginning for possible preeclampsia treatment
For over 20 years, a team of researchers at Lund University has worked on developing a drug against preeclampsia -- a serious disorder which annually affects around 9 million pregnant women worldwide and is one of the main causes of death in both mothers and unborn babies.

Underenrollment in clinical trials: Patients not the problem
The authors of the study published this month in the Journal of Clinical Oncology investigated why many cancer clinical trials fail to enroll enough patients.

When designing clinical trials for huntington's disease, first ask the experts
Progress in understanding the genetic mutation responsible for Huntington's disease (HD) and at least some molecular underpinnings of the disease has resulted in a new era of clinical testing of potential treatments.

New ALS therapy in clinical trials
New research led by Washington University School of Medicine in St.

Read More: Clinical Trials News and Clinical Trials Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.