The dangers of passive smoking in adults: the ERS 11th Annual Congress provides first hard evidence

September 25, 2001

Passive smoking is already recognized as a factor in the development of asthma in children, but there is still some controversy regarding its role in adult asthma.

The 11th European Congress on Lung Disease and Respiratory Medicine today in Berlin (Germany) provides the first hard evidence, derived mainly from a Finnish report presented in Berlin Monday.

A team working under Maritta Jaakkola, of the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in Helsinki, studied 718 subjects in the district of Pirkanmaa, southern Finland. Of those, 231 had been diagnosed with asthma in the previous two and a half years, and the remaining 487 represented the control group. None of the subjects had ever smoked.

Comparing exposure to passive smoking by the two groups in the previous twelve months, Jaakkola produced highly telling figures that made for a pioneering presentation to the 11th European Respiratory Society Annual Congress. Subjects exposed to smoke in the workplace were 2.16 times more likely to develop asthma than those who were not exposed. A subject whose partner smoked was 4.77 times more at risk of developing asthma !

"Our results demonstrate conclusively that passive smoking plays a role in the development of adult asthma", stated Jaakkola.

Women suffer the most exposure

In addition to those relative risks, two other studies presented in Berlin revealed that women are particularly affected.

The first was undertaken by Sandra Baldacci, of the Institute of Clinical Physiology in Pisa, Italy, and involved 2,335 non-smoking Italian women drawn from four different areas of the country. The results that she presented to the Congress revealed that 47% of women reported an acute recent exposure (last 7 days) to passive smoking. Considering the lifetime exposure, 63% of women suffered most of the exposure at home and 43% in the workplace.

The link between exposure to others' smoke and various respiratory dysfunctions varied according to the circumstances; for example, shortness of breath at rest and obstructive lung disease (chronic bronchitis or emphysema) were clearly linked to smoking by the patient's partner (which multiplied the respective risks by 1.4 and 1.6) and still more strongly linked to smoke in the workplace (which multiplied the risks by 2.1 and 2.3). The respective risks for women who were married to smokers and also worked among smokers were, predictably, even higher at 2.8 and 4.2.

A German study, undertaken by Michaela Kreuzer (BfS-Institute for Radiation Hygiene) and H.-Erich Wichmann (GSF-Institute of Epidemiology), Neuherberg/Munich, on non-smoking female lung cancer patients, also reveals the adverse impact of other people's smoke.

As Dr. Kreuzer explains to the 11th European Congress on Lung Disease and Respiratory Medicine, her study covered 234 women diagnosed with lung cancer who had never smoked (typically some 20 to 30 per cent of women with lung cancer). They were compared to a control group of 535 women who had smoked no more than 400 cigarettes in their life. Independently of the other risk factors assessed in the study, the relative role of passive smoking at work was found to be beyond doubt, while no clear association of lung cancer and passive smoking at home was observed.

The risk of lung cancer was multiplied by 1.67 for women who had been exposed to their partner's smoke for a total of more than 76,000 hours, and by 2.67 for those exposed to more than 40,000 hours of passive smoking at work.

Finally, the Berlin Congress heard a number of references to the first results of the large European Community Respiratory Health Survey, involving 36 research centers in 16 countries. One of the aspects it focused on was passive smoking, as described in a poster that was discussed on Monday morning and presented by Christer Janson, of Uppsala University, Sweden.

It indicated that, at 12 of the 36 centres, half of the subjects studied were regularly exposed to passive smoking, particularly in the workplace. While the degree of exposure varied hugely between countries (from only 2% in Uppsala to 54% in Galdakao, Spain), the consequences were no less revealing. In particular, the authors of the Berlin communication pointed to a greater frequency of nocturnal respiratory symptoms, shortness of breath following exertion and excessive bronchial responsiveness.

Logically, Jansen concluded that "decreasing environmental tobacco smoke, particularly in the workplace, is likely to improve respiratory health".
-end-


European Respiratory Society

Related Lung Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

State-level lung cancer screening rates not aligned with lung cancer burden in the US
A new study reports that state-level lung cancer screening rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden.

The lung microbiome may affect lung cancer pathogenesis and prognosis
Enrichment of the lungs with oral commensal microbes was associated with advanced stage disease, worse prognosis, and tumor progression in patients with lung cancer, according to results from a study published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

New analysis finds lung cancer screening reduces rates of lung cancer-specific death
Low-dose CT screening methods may prevent one death per 250 at-risk adults screened, according to a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled clinical trials of lung cancer screening.

'Social smokers' face disproportionate risk of death from lung disease and lung cancer
'Social smokers' are more than twice as likely to die of lung disease and more than eight times as likely to die of lung cancer than non-smokers, according to research presented at the European Respiratory Society International Congress.

Lung cancer therapy may improve outcomes of metastatic brain cancer
A medication commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer that has spread, or metastasized, may have benefits for patients with metastatic brain cancers, suggests a new review and analysis led by researchers at St.

Cancer mortality continues steady decline, driven by progress against lung cancer
The cancer death rate declined by 29% from 1991 to 2017, including a 2.2% drop from 2016 to 2017, the largest single-year drop in cancer mortality ever reported.

Cancer-sniffing dogs 97% accurate in identifying lung cancer, according to study in JAOA
The next step will be to further fractionate the samples based on chemical and physical properties, presenting them back to the dogs until the specific biomarkers for each cancer are identified.

Lung transplant patients face elevated lung cancer risk
In an American Journal of Transplantation study, lung cancer risk was increased after lung transplantation, especially in the native (non-transplanted) lung of single lung transplant recipients.

Proposed cancer treatment may boost lung cancer stem cells, study warns
Epigenetic therapies -- targeting enzymes that alter what genes are turned on or off in a cell -- are of growing interest in the cancer field as a way of making a cancer less aggressive or less malignant.

Are you at risk for lung cancer?
This question isn't only for people who've smoked a lot.

Read More: Lung Cancer News and Lung Cancer Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.