Experts urge reform of international patent system at eve of WIPO assembly

September 26, 2005

Maastricht -- An international seminar to discuss the contribution of Intellectual Property Rights to development has called on the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to pay greater attention to the diverse needs and technological capacities of developing countries, instead of focusing on deeper harmonization of intellectual property standards.

Held at the eve of the WIPO General Assembly (taking place between 26 September to 5 October in Geneva), forty scholars and policy analysts meeting at United Nations University Institute for New Technologies (UNU-INTECH) warned that the current IP regime is undermining agreed sustainable development targets.

Of particular concern is the implementation of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, passed at the 4th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization.

Noting that the current system has become greatly skewed in favour of protecting private knowledge goods, without taking into account the social costs incurred, participants urged that greater efforts be paid to building an effective framework to govern the public knowledge arena, and strengthening local capabilities to develop alternatives to patented products.

The keynote speaker, Professor Richard Nelson (Columbia University) cited recent independent studies that have arrived at the general conclusion that "...while patents are the primary incentive for profit-motivated invention in some key technologies, they are actually causing harm in other areas, including some 'high-tech' industries involved primarily in R&D."

Several proposals on alternative ways of rewarding technological innovations that are in the public interest were discussed, including a new US bill - The Medical Innovation Prize Fund Act (HR 417) - that would create a fund to compensate innovators when they bring new pharmaceuticals to the market.

In marked contrast to traditional patents, pharmaceutical companies would need to provide proof of the incremental therapeutic benefits of a new product, in order to receive compensation.

The outcome of the meeting will provide input for the 'Friends of Development' Group, which has called for the establishment of a Development Agenda at WIPO. An executive summary of the Maastricht seminar (attached below) will be presented at the WIPO meeting.

International Seminar - Contributions to the Development Agenda on Intellectual Property Rights

TRIPS as it stands is against the interests of developing countries, and needs reform. In developing their own patent law, developing countries need to recognize that there is now near consensuses among informed observers that patent law and practice have, in some cases, overshot, and need to be reformed. That is the burden of the recent NAS/NRC report on "A Patent System for the 21st Century.
(Richard Nelson - George Blumenthal Professor of International and Public Affairs, Business, and Law, Columbia University and keynote speaker at the Maastricht Seminar)

Executive Summary

As a result of an initiative of academic professors and researchers, the International Seminar - Contributions to the Development Agenda on Intellectual Property Rights - took place at the United Nations University (UNU-INTECH), in Maastricht, on September 23 and 24, 2005.

The main focus of the Seminar was to explore important issues raised in the realm of the proposal presented at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) by a Group of developing countries - the Group of Friends of Development - centered on existing challenges to accommodate development goals with the generation of innovation and, more specifically, with IP use (www.wipo.org)

The document prepared by the Group of Friends of Development provokes important reflections on four main dimensions: norm setting on IP, technology transfer, WIPO's mandate, and technical cooperation. During the two days of the Maastricht Event discussions explored evidences from economics of innovation and different policy frameworks, borrowing from cases of specific technological areas in order to address the main points presented within the Development Agenda proposal.

Six papers were prepared to support the debates, covering the following topics:
  • the structuring and the functioning of IP systems;
  • IPRs and competition policies;
  • IPRs and knowledge-intensive sectors - pharmaceutical, biotechnological, and IT
  • alternatives for accessing knowledge; and
  • IPRs, technology, and the challenges of development.

    The main issues that emerged from the Seminar can be summarized as follows:

    1. IP rights are economic rights. They are granted not as an end in themselves, but only as a means to specific goals: the promotion of creativity and innovation, culture and science. However, IPRs can have a negative effect not only on economic and social welfare, but also on innovation itself.

    2. Attribution of IPRs should be allowed only insofar as it does not undermine the basic principle of the open science system. Free and universal access to scientific knowledge is at the same time a fundamental engine of innovation and a constitutive principle of democracy.

    3. The task of constructing better and more balanced IPR regimes which facilitate their role as instruments of innovation incentives is an issue for both developing and developed countries;

    4. Any extension of IPRs, whether in terms of subject matter, length, type or jurisdiction of protection must be based on clear evidence of their net benefits.

    5. The global framework for intellectual property laws must permit nations to experiment with different approaches. Excessive harmonization should be avoided, in order to protect the space for innovation in the mechanisms of supporting innovation and creativity.

    6. Countries must also have the flexibility to adapt intellectual property rights, and exceptions and limitations to those rights, to their stage of development and local circumstances.

    7. Bilateral trade agreements with TRIPS plus provisions undermine multilateralism and the existing flexibilities. The further expansion and strengthening of protection entails additional burdens and social costs, in particular for developing countries.

    8. IPRs are among a range of inducement mechanisms for innovation. Several studies have shown that IPRs are important inducements in some sectors but not in others.

    9. IP policy should be coherent with and complementary to innovation, competition, and regulatory policies.

    10. Patents' ultimate goal should be to stimulate investment in inventive activity rather than serving as an asset for rent seeking and litigation.

    Participants agreed on the following proposals:

  • To develop an international network of researcher's from both developing and developed countries to act as a locus for debates on IPR, contributing to policy making at both the national and international levels with the explicit aim of enhancing global creativity, inventive activity, and innovation and to signal where necessary the possible negative impacts of IPR on global economic welfare.

  • To reflect on alternative IPR models addressing current imbalances in the global IPR regime, as well as the implications for global welfare, competition and access to knowledge of changes in IPR being negotiated at bilateral and multilateral levels

  • To broaden the scope of academic and policy research on IPR, so as to include fully the implications of IPR for creativity, inventive activity, innovation, and capacity development in developing countries. Such intellectual broadening will need to involve the integration of different actors, such as - academic researchers, policy makers, international negotiators, and civil society organizations, as well as the integration of different relevant disciplines for IPR: economy, law, management of technology, political science, and international relations
    -end-
    Organizers and sponsors: United Nations University (UNU-INTECH), Prof. Luc Soete and Rishab Ghosh; National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI, Brazil) Jorge Ávila, Vice-President, and Maria Beatriz Amorim Páscoa, Director of Institutional Partnership; University of Columbia Catch-up Project, Prof. Richard Nelson; Institutions, Organizations and Strategies, Network on Globalization and Development (REDES/Ford Foundation), Ana Célia Castro and Leonardo Burlamaqui, project coordinators; Laboratory on Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, CCJE, Institute of Economics and Fundação José Bonifácio), Alcino Câmara Neto and Luiz Martins de Melo.

    The main objectives of this meeting are to promote networking among leading scholars concerned with the impact of IPRs on development and to find ways for cross-subsidisation between that research network and policy makers who may lead economic transformation.

    About UNU-INTECH
    The Institute for New Technologies of the United Nations University (UNU-INTECH) was set up in Maastricht, The Netherlands by the Council of the United Nations University in 1990. UNU is an international community of scholars engaged in research, postgraduate training and the dissemination of knowledge aimed at furthering the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. Within the UNU family, INTECH conducts research and policy-oriented analyses and undertakes capacity building in the area of new technologies: the opportunities they present, the vectors for their generation and diffusion and the nature of their economic and social impact, especially in relation to the developing countries.

    For more information please contact: Wangu Mwangi, Communications Coordinator UNU-INTECH (mwangi@intech.unu.edu. Tel: +31-43 350 6365)

    United Nations University

    Related Innovation Articles from Brightsurf:

    Food system innovation -- and how to get there
    Food production has always shaped the lives of humans and the surface of the Earth.

    What is the best way to encourage innovation? Competitive pay may be the answer
    Economists and business leaders agree that innovation is a major force behind economic growth, but many disagree on what is the best way to encourage workers to produce the 'think-outside-of-the-box' ideas that create newer and better products and services.

    Innovation is widespread in rural areas, not just cities
    Conventional measures of innovation suggest that only big cities foster new ideas, but a more comprehensive measure developed at Penn State shows that innovation is widespread even in rural places not typically thought of as innovative.

    Scaling up search for analogies could be key to innovation
    Investment in research is at an all-time high, yet the rate of scientific breakthroughs isn't setting any records.

    Why you should be concerned about Oprah Winfrey when introducing an innovation
    New research by Bocconi University's Paola Cillo and Gaia Rubera with Texas A&M's David Griffith asserts that the reaction of large individual investors to innovation is an important component of stock returns, their reaction to innovation depends on their national culture, and there is a way to segment large individual investors and pitch innovation to them accordingly.

    Responsible innovation key to smart farming
    Responsible innovation that considers the wider impacts on society is key to smart farming, according to academics at the University of East Anglia (UEA).

    Pillars of academic innovation
    Highlights from the Sixth Annual Conference of the National Academy of Inventors, including high-tech solutions to combat child pornography and radicalization materials; groundbreaking programs to promote STEM major retention; and new materials for wearable technology.

    Universities drive innovation in the classroom
    The current issue of Technology and Innovation, Journal of the National Academy of Inventors ® (19.2) examines innovation from the university perspective, highlighting what the most innovative institutions and educators worldwide are doing to prepare future engineers and industry leaders to effectively manage IP to grow their companies and the global economy as a whole.

    How universities are fostering innovation and entrepreneurship
    Technology and Innovation 19.1 zeroes in on innovation and entrepreneurship, with a special focus on what universities are currently doing to foster growth in those areas both for their success and the success of the communities and regions to which they are connected.

    Shaping the future of health innovation
    Future advances in healthcare will be aided by a new £10 million facility -- the National Institute for Health Research Innovation Observatory based at Newcastle University, UK.

    Read More: Innovation News and Innovation Current Events
  • Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.