Nav: Home

Decision aids help patients with depression feel better about medication choices

September 28, 2015

Choosing the right antidepressant can be a daunting task. With so many choices and such unpredictability in their individual effects, patients with depression often spend months or years casting about for the right medication, while clinicians are often uneasy or unwilling to offer options other than their preferred prescriptions.

A new study from Mayo Clinic shows that a simple series of conversation cards can dramatically improve both the patient's and their physician's satisfaction with the discussion on and comfort with the choice of antidepressant. The findings appear in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

"We worked closely with patients, their families, and clinicians to fully understand what really matters to them when confronted with this situation. We wanted to transform the too-often unavailable evidence into accurate, easily accessible information to be used within the context of each person's needs and preferences, ultimately creating what we hope to be meaningful conversations," says Annie LeBlanc, Ph.D., first author and Mayo Clinic health science researcher.

This study evaluated information from 117 physicians and 301 patients from a range of Minnesota and Wisconsin communities. Compared to their usual care, the use of decision aids improved patients' comfort in making decisions by 5 out of 100 points, their knowledge by 10 out of 100 points, and the likelihood of being satisfied by 2.4-fold, the study found. Physicians also reported an increase in decision-making comfort by 11 out of 100 points, a 1.6-fold increase in the likelihood of being satisfied. The extent to which they involve patients in the decision-making process during the clinical encounters increased by 16 out of 100 points. Interestingly, the use of the tool did not add to the length of the discussion.

Patients often abandon antidepressants because of unrealistic expectations, lack of treatment efficacy, or unacceptable side effects. Physicians, meanwhile, often focus on a medication's stated effectiveness, rather than the patient's broader needs and preferences. The decision aids tested in this trial come in the form of evidence-based conversation tools, designed to help patients and their doctors use the best information about depression medicines to address the specific situations of the patients using the medicine. Used in the context of these conversations, these decision-making tools can help the patient and doctor arrive at more informed, patient-centered choices.

Though this study did not conclude a difference in effectiveness or adherence to medication, the researchers say that improving the process by which patients and clinicians select an antidepressant, and making both parties feel more comfortable in their medication choice, is a step toward more effectively treating depression in the future.

"High value healthcare involves aligning the care we give patients with their values, preferences, and life circumstances, alongside the best evidence available for that care," explains Dr. LeBlanc. "This tool is but one way we can effectively approach the ideal of patient-centered care for patients with depression. And, with limited cost and burden to the system, this tool and its associated three minutes of training are available free online." For more information visit Mayo Clinic's Shared Decision Making Resource Center.
-end-
This study was funded by the Agency for Healthcare and Quality Research under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and conducted as part of the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery. No conflict of interest disclosures were reported.

Co-authors of the study are: Annie LeBlanc, Ph.D., Mark Williams, M.D., Jonathan Inselman, Megan Branda, Nilay Shah, Ph.D., Emma Heim, Sara Dick, M.D., Marc Matthews, M.D., Kathleen Yost, Ph.D., Kathryn Shepel, and Victor Montori, M.D., all of Mayo Clinic; Kristen Dall-Winther, M.D., of Mayo Clinic Health System; Jeph Herrin, Ph.D., of Yale University; and Mark Linzer, M.D., and Deborah Boehm, M.Ph. of Hennepin County Medical Center.

Mayo Clinic

Related Depression Articles:

Which comes first: Smartphone dependency or depression?
New research suggests a person's reliance on his or her smartphone predicts greater loneliness and depressive symptoms, as opposed to the other way around.
Depression breakthrough
Major depressive disorder -- referred to colloquially as the 'black dog' -- has been identified as a genetic cause for 20 distinct diseases, providing vital information to help detect and manage high rates of physical illnesses in people diagnosed with depression.
CPAP provides relief from depression
Researchers have found that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can improve depression symptoms in patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases.
Post-natal depression in dads linked to depression in their teenage daughters
Fathers as well as mothers can experience post-natal depression -- and it is linked to emotional problems for their teenage daughters, new research has found.
Being overweight likely to cause depression, even without health complications
A largescale genomic analysis has found the strongest evidence yet that being overweight causes depression, even in the absence of other health problems.
More Depression News and Depression Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#537 Science Journalism, Hold the Hype
Everyone's seen a piece of science getting over-exaggerated in the media. Most people would be quick to blame journalists and big media for getting in wrong. In many cases, you'd be right. But there's other sources of hype in science journalism. and one of them can be found in the humble, and little-known press release. We're talking with Chris Chambers about doing science about science journalism, and where the hype creeps in. Related links: The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial This...