Confident Committee Not Always Best At Solving Problem, Scholars Say

October 03, 1997

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. -- A decision made with beaming confidence by a committee may not necessarily be the best solution, researchers say. One may need to consider the type of problem that was addressed and the influence of individuals who were in the group.

Confidence and accuracy appear to reflect social influence exerted by individuals within a group, report University of Illinois psychologists in a paper published in the July issue of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. The findings resulted from a study of decision-making by individuals, by groups of two members and by groups of five members.

In general, researchers found that groups perform better than individuals, and that the five-member groups were the most effective for subjective tasks involving judgment. Where the picture blurred, however, was in the confidence levels: Group confidence of a solution was stronger than that held by individuals, and group confidence can be justified but also sometimes be unwarranted.

Confidence should be placed in context of the type of problem being solved, said Janet A. Sniezek, a professor of psychology. With an objective issue, such as a math problem, it is likely that someone in a group can clearly demonstrate an answer that others will accept. Accuracy isn't so clear when the problem could have alternative solutions, Sniezek said.

In the study, the groups considered tasks that varied in the difficulty of demonstrating why a solution is a good one. Each individual was asked to report his or her confidence level in solving the problem at both the beginning and conclusion of the task.

Groups were more effective than individuals in solving subjective tasks, such as definitively forecasting a result. In fact, large groups often displayed unrealistic overconfidence. Such a possibility can occur when individuals who are not confident entering the decision-making process end up latching on to a well-presented explanation for a suggested solution, Sniezek said.

"Confidence is an imperfect indicator of accuracy. We may have few other clues to go on in group settings, but it's good to push and to explore to get the reasons behind someone's opinion," she said. "Don't let someone's certainty be a proxy for explanation. This may not always be possible. People should recognize that an individual's confidence can be influential above and beyond the reasons."

A subsequent, as-yet unpublished study looked closer at the impact of individual influence on a committee's decision-making. In a report in May to the Midwest Psychological Association in Chicago, co-investigator Paul Zarnoth, a U. of I. doctoral student in psychology, said that a person with high confidence and strong arguments wields substantial influence.However, the study also found that if the highly confident person's arguments are not demonstrated convincingly, then the influence can be totally lost, Sniezek said. "It is reassuring to know that there appears to be limits to confidence's influence," she said.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Related Psychology Articles from Brightsurf:

More than one cognition: A call for change in the field of comparative psychology
In a paper published in the Journal of Intelligence, researchers argue that cognitive studies in comparative psychology often wrongly take an anthropocentric approach, resulting in an over-valuation of human-like abilities and the assumption that cognitive skills cluster in animals as they do in humans.

Psychology research: Antivaxxers actually think differently than other people
As vaccine skepticism has become increasingly widespread, two researchers in the Texas Tech University Department of Psychological Sciences have suggested a possible explanation.

In court, far-reaching psychology tests are unquestioned
Psychological tests are important instruments used in courts to aid legal decisions that profoundly affect people's lives.

Psychology program for refugee children improves wellbeing
A positive psychology program created by researchers at Queen Mary University of London focuses on promoting wellbeing in refugee children.

Psychology can help prevent deadly childhood accidents
Injuries have overtaken infectious disease as the leading cause of death for children worldwide, and psychologists have the research needed to help predict and prevent deadly childhood mishaps, according to a presentation at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association.

Raising the standard for psychology research
Researchers from Stanford University, Arizona State University, and Dartmouth College used Texas Advanced Computing Center supercomputers to apply more rigorous statistical methods to psychological studies of self-regulation.

Psychology: Robot saved, people take the hit
To what extent are people prepared to show consideration for robots?

Researchers help to bridge the gap between psychology and gamification
A multi-disciplinary research team is bridging the gap between psychology and gamification that could significantly impact learning efforts in user experience design, healthcare, and government.

Virtual reality at the service of psychology
Our environment is composed according to certain rules and characteristics which are so obvious to us that we are scarcely aware of them.

Modeling human psychology
A human being's psychological make-up depends on an array of emotional and motivational parameters.

Read More: Psychology News and Psychology Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to