Nav: Home

Extending cervical screening beyond 5 years for some women is safe

October 04, 2016

Extending the cervical cancer screening interval beyond five years for women aged 40 and older who test negative for human papilloma virus (HPV) is safe, say researchers from the Netherlands in The BMJ this week.

Extending screening for women who test positive for HPV, however, is not recommended.

Trials have shown that screening for HPV leads to earlier detection of abnormal cells (known as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or CIN) than cytology (smear) testing - and offers better protection against cervical cancer.

CIN is divided into grades - CIN1, 2 or 3. The higher the number, the more of the cervix is affected by abnormal cells.

Currently in the UK, women aged between 25 and 49 are invited for screening every three years, and up to the age of 64, every five years.

In the Netherlands, screening intervals for HPV negative women aged at least 40 years will be increased from five to 10 years in 2017.

But evidence on the safety of screening intervals beyond five years is limited. So a team of researchers based in the Netherlands decided to assess the safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years.

They base their findings on 14 year follow-up data from over 43,000 women aged 29-61 years who took part in a large trial of three cervical screening rounds (each round done every five years).

Women were randomly assigned to receive both HPV and cytology testing (intervention) or cytology testing only (control) and were managed according to their test results.

The data show that HPV negative women aged at least 40 have a very low risk of CIN3+ (the highest grade of abnormal cells) in the long term, "indicating that extension of the current screening interval in the Netherlands is justifiable," say the authors.

But they stress that for HPV positive women, the long term risk of CIN3+ is too high to support extending screening beyond five years.

The use of the HPV test result and age to define the year of next screen is a first step towards tailoring screening to individual risks - and could improve screening efficiency and eventually provide optimal prevention for all women, they write.

However, they point out that data on cervical cancer risk are inconclusive, and "therefore it remains important to closely monitor the number of interval cancers observed under the new HPV based screening programme."
-end-
Research: Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands http://www.bmj.com/content/355/bmj.i4924

About BMJ

BMJ is a healthcare knowledge provider that aims to advance healthcare worldwide by sharing knowledge and expertise to improve experiences, outcomes and value. For a full list of BMJ products and services, please visit bmj.com

BMJ

Related Cervical Cancer Articles:

How have HPV vaccines affected cervical cancer screening?
A new review looks at cervical cancer screening in the era of HPV vaccination.
New tech promises easier cervical cancer screening
Duke University researchers have developed a handheld device for cervical cancer screening that promises to do away with uncomfortable speculums and high-cost colposcopes.
Women should continue cervical cancer screening as they approach age 65
While current guidelines indicate that cervical cancer screening can be stopped for average risk patients after age 65, many women lack the appropriate amount of screening history to accurately assess their risk.
$1.5 million grant to prevent cervical cancer in West Texas
Navkiran Shokar, M.A., M.P.H, M.D., has received nearly $1.5 million from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) to reduce the burden of cervical cancer in West Texas.
Study finds not all women get appropriate care for cervical cancer
Fewer than three out of five women with cervical cancer received guideline-based care, a new study finds.
Cervical cancer mortality rates may be underestimated
A new analysis reveals that for most women, the risk of dying from cervical cancer is higher than previously thought.
Cervical cancer screening could be less frequent, start later
Women may only need cervical cancer screening every 5-10 years -- instead of every three years, as currently recommended -- and may be able to start the screenings later in life, according to Harvard T.H.
Pap screenings linked to less cervical cancer in elderly women
A new study from the University of Illinois confirms a link between Pap smear screenings and a lower risk of developing cervical cancer in women over age 65.
Lupus confirmed as risk factor for cervical cancer
Lupus confirmed as risk factor for cervical cancer
'This enormous burden': Controlling cervical cancer in Latin America
Cervical cancer is an 'enormous burden' for Latin-American society, and the third leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the region, say Dr.

Related Cervical Cancer Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#529 Do You Really Want to Find Out Who's Your Daddy?
At least some of you by now have probably spit into a tube and mailed it off to find out who your closest relatives are, where you might be from, and what terrible diseases might await you. But what exactly did you find out? And what did you give away? In this live panel at Awesome Con we bring in science writer Tina Saey to talk about all her DNA testing, and bioethicist Debra Mathews, to determine whether Tina should have done it at all. Related links: What FamilyTreeDNA sharing genetic data with police means for you Crime solvers embraced...