Nav: Home

Health professionals must lead on fighting climate change

October 04, 2016

Health professionals must act together to urge drastic reductions in carbon dioxide and short lived climate pollutants - the main contributors to climate change - argue leading experts in The BMJ this week.

These drastic reductions are needed to stabilise the climate below 2°C warming and reduce major threats to health, including from extreme events such as heat waves, droughts, floods, and fires and to food production for many millions of people, they argue.

The World Health Organization says that without adequate mitigation and adaptation "climate change poses unacceptable risks to global public health."

"It's imperative that health professionals worldwide show strong leadership in tackling climate change," argue Distinguished Professor Veerabhadran Ramanathan from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego, and Professor Sir Andy Haines from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

They explain that carbon dioxide and the four short lived climate pollutants (SLCPs)--methane, black carbon, ozone, and hydrofluorocarbons--are the main contributors to climate change.

However, the four SLCPs are "super pollutants" as they contribute as much as 40% to climate change, and are up to 2,000 times more powerful per molecule than CO2 in warming the climate.

SLCPs, especially black carbon particles, are also super pollutants in terms of public health effects.

Fine particulate air pollution from solid biomass fuels, which emit a large amount of black carbon particles, and burning fossil contribute to around 7 million deaths per year, mostly from heart disease, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from both household and outdoor exposure.

They explain that if past trends in emission growth continue beyond 2050, "our grandchildren will witness around 4°C warming, with potentially devastating consequences."

Drastic reductions in carbon dioxide and SLCPs are needed to "bend the emission curve downwards" and "stabilise climate change within one generation", and "make the global economy carbon neutral this century," they say.

Reducing SLCPs will cut pollution and reduce the rate of warming by as much as 50% by 2050, and would prevent around 2.4 million premature deaths annually from reduced air pollution, they explain.

"Health professionals have key roles in fighting climate change caused by both short lived climate pollutants and carbon dioxide," they argue.

They need to show how destruction of ecosystems, declines in crop yields, and ocean acidification could reverse recent advances in global health, especially on populations of low income countries.

Furthermore, health professionals should emphasise the health benefits of a decarbonised economy, and engage fully with industry leaders to achieve this goal.
Editorial: Healthcare professionals must lead on climate change

The UK Health Alliance on Climate Change will be launching a report "A Breath of Fresh Air", on health, climate change, and air pollution on 18 October. For more information, visit:

The BMJ is a found member of The UK Health Alliance on Climate Change. For more information, visit:

About BMJ

BMJ is a healthcare knowledge provider that aims to advance healthcare worldwide by sharing knowledge and expertise to improve experiences, outcomes and value. For a full list of BMJ products and services, please visit


Related Climate Change Articles:

The black forest and climate change
Silver and Douglas firs could replace Norway spruce in the long run due to their greater resistance to droughts.
For some US counties, climate change will be particularly costly
A highly granular assessment of the impacts of climate change on the US economy suggests that each 1°Celsius increase in temperature will cost 1.2 percent of the country's gross domestic product, on average.
Climate change label leads to climate science acceptance
A new Cornell University study finds that labels matter when it comes to acceptance of climate science.
Was that climate change?
A new four-step 'framework' aims to test the contribution of climate change to record-setting extreme weather events.
It's more than just climate change
Accurately modeling climate change and interactive human factors -- including inequality, consumption, and population -- is essential for the effective science-based policies and measures needed to benefit and sustain current and future generations.
Climate change scientists should think more about sex
Climate change can have a different impact on male and female fish, shellfish and other marine animals, with widespread implications for the future of marine life and the production of seafood.
Climate change prompts Alaska fish to change breeding behavior
A new University of Washington study finds that one of Alaska's most abundant freshwater fish species is altering its breeding patterns in response to climate change, which could impact the ecology of northern lakes that already acutely feel the effects of a changing climate.
Uncertainties related to climate engineering limit its use in curbing climate change
Climate engineering refers to the systematic, large-scale modification of the environment using various climate intervention techniques.
Public holds polarized views about climate change and trust in climate scientists
There are gaping divisions in Americans' views across every dimension of the climate debate, including causes and cures for climate change and trust in climate scientists and their research, according to a new Pew Research Center survey.
The psychology behind climate change denial
In a new thesis in psychology, Kirsti Jylhä at Uppsala University has studied the psychology behind climate change denial.

Related Climate Change Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#529 Do You Really Want to Find Out Who's Your Daddy?
At least some of you by now have probably spit into a tube and mailed it off to find out who your closest relatives are, where you might be from, and what terrible diseases might await you. But what exactly did you find out? And what did you give away? In this live panel at Awesome Con we bring in science writer Tina Saey to talk about all her DNA testing, and bioethicist Debra Mathews, to determine whether Tina should have done it at all. Related links: What FamilyTreeDNA sharing genetic data with police means for you Crime solvers embraced...