Nav: Home

'Goldilocks fires' can enhance biodiversity in Western forests

October 04, 2016

Forest fires were long thought to have a negative impact on the environment and on biodiversity, but in recent decades the importance of fire in sustaining and even enhancing natural systems has been demonstrated by researchers and increasingly embraced by land managers.

Now, a team of scientists has shown that mixed-severity fires - those that are on the whole not too hot, not too cold, but just right - can lead to increased biodiversity of birds in California forests over time.

Fires in the U.S. are on average getting bigger and more severe - and are expected to continue to do so under future scenarios of climate change. The researchers suggest that forest managers should prioritize managing forests so that they are more likely to burn at a mixture of intensities: as the study's lead author Morgan Tingley puts it, "Goldilocks fires," or those that have large patches of both heavily-burned and lightly-burned forest.

"Due to climate change and a buildup of fuels from historical fire suppression, fires appear to be increasingly burning large swaths of forest at high severity, and that's not good for biodiversity," says Tingley, assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut.

"Mixed-severity fire is more likely to occur when forests with a natural level of structural diversity burn, resulting in a mosaic of patches of different burn severities. To promote biodiversity, forests with a diversity of structures and ages should be a goal of management practices."

Tingley and colleagues from The Institute for Bird Populations, the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, and the U.S. Forest Service visited more than 100 fire sites in California's Sierra Nevada over the course of six years and assessed them at various stages up to 10 years after they had burned.

They surveyed bird populations and compared their findings with satellite-derived images that measure burn severity, along with environmental variables like elevation, latitude and time since the area burned. Using birds as a proxy for biodiversity makes sense, says Tingley, because birds can respond relatively quickly to their environment and are important in establishing post-fire niches that other animals can fill.

"Certain types of birds that colonize recently burned forests help make the burned areas more hospitable for other species," says Rodney Siegel, Executive Director of The Institute for Bird Populations and a co-author on the study. "Woodpeckers are rapid colonizers, and they excavate tree cavities that are subsequently used by other animals, including other birds or even mammals."

The researchers' data showed that areas with a greater mixture of severities - termed pyrodiversity - had more diverse bird communities, an effect that became more pronounced with each year that passed after fire. Tingley says this not only shows the persistent and beneficial effects that fires can have on landscapes, but emphasizes the need to study burned areas long after the ashes have cooled.

This role of time in interacting with fire severity to create and maintain biodiversity has not been shown previously, he says.

"Our results show there is much to be learned by studying ecological dynamics following the immediate aftermath of a fire," notes Tingley. "Fires that burn at different severities can create different habitat patches that host increasingly different bird communities over time. This can have the positive effect of infusing diversity into areas that were once homogenous."

He adds that fire has positive impacts on the environment, but climate change may be making fires less beneficial over time.

"We believe there are actions forest managers can take to promote pyrodiversity, and by extension biodiversity. Testing the efficacy of some of those actions is an important next step in this work. "
The study appears Oct. 5 in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

University of Connecticut

Related Climate Change Articles:

The black forest and climate change
Silver and Douglas firs could replace Norway spruce in the long run due to their greater resistance to droughts.
For some US counties, climate change will be particularly costly
A highly granular assessment of the impacts of climate change on the US economy suggests that each 1°Celsius increase in temperature will cost 1.2 percent of the country's gross domestic product, on average.
Climate change label leads to climate science acceptance
A new Cornell University study finds that labels matter when it comes to acceptance of climate science.
Was that climate change?
A new four-step 'framework' aims to test the contribution of climate change to record-setting extreme weather events.
It's more than just climate change
Accurately modeling climate change and interactive human factors -- including inequality, consumption, and population -- is essential for the effective science-based policies and measures needed to benefit and sustain current and future generations.
Climate change scientists should think more about sex
Climate change can have a different impact on male and female fish, shellfish and other marine animals, with widespread implications for the future of marine life and the production of seafood.
Climate change prompts Alaska fish to change breeding behavior
A new University of Washington study finds that one of Alaska's most abundant freshwater fish species is altering its breeding patterns in response to climate change, which could impact the ecology of northern lakes that already acutely feel the effects of a changing climate.
Uncertainties related to climate engineering limit its use in curbing climate change
Climate engineering refers to the systematic, large-scale modification of the environment using various climate intervention techniques.
Public holds polarized views about climate change and trust in climate scientists
There are gaping divisions in Americans' views across every dimension of the climate debate, including causes and cures for climate change and trust in climate scientists and their research, according to a new Pew Research Center survey.
The psychology behind climate change denial
In a new thesis in psychology, Kirsti Jylhä at Uppsala University has studied the psychology behind climate change denial.

Related Climate Change Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#530 Why Aren't We Dead Yet?
We only notice our immune systems when they aren't working properly, or when they're under attack. How does our immune system understand what bits of us are us, and what bits are invading germs and viruses? How different are human immune systems from the immune systems of other creatures? And is the immune system so often the target of sketchy medical advice? Those questions and more, this week in our conversation with author Idan Ben-Barak about his book "Why Aren't We Dead Yet?: The Survivor’s Guide to the Immune System".