Nav: Home

E-cigarette vapor non-toxic to human lung cells in lab tests

October 05, 2016

Vapour from e-cigarettes is non-toxic to human lung cells under normal usage conditions. But even when tested using extremely unrealistically high doses, e-cigarette vapour proved to be significantly less toxic to human lung cells than cigarette smoke.

Cigarette smoke was cytotoxic even at levels typically observed in real life use. And lung cells exhibited low levels of cytotoxicity only after exposing cells to a vapour amount equivalent to a day's exposure in just one hour.

'We only saw signs of cytotoxicity from the e-cigarette aerosols when we used unrealistically high levels of vapour,' explains Dr Chris Proctor, Chief Scientific Officer at British American Tobacco. 'The conservative approach we took means that it is unlikely that normal vaping use would yield cytotoxic effects, even at the low levels observed here.'

The research is published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2016. 1217112.

Scientists at British American Tobacco used an advanced lung cell exposure system to investigate the potential adverse effects of e-cigarette vapour on airway tissue compared with cigarette smoke. A puffing machine was used with human lung cells to compare the potential cytotoxic effects of vapour with cigarette smoke in a way that mimics real-life exposures.

The cytotoxicity of the exposed cells was measured using a test called a 'neutral red uptake assay'. A neutral red uptake assay involves adding a red dye to cells. Living cells incorporate the red dye into cell components called lysosomes - the cell's waste disposal system - staining them red. As the cells begin to die, they lose the ability to incorporate this dye and the cells change in colour from red to light pink.

A commercially available e-cigarette, Vype ePen, was tested and its potential cytotoxic impact was compared to that of a 3R4F reference cigarette.

In order to elicit a cytotoxic response with the Vype e-pen e-cigarette, it was necessary to deliver an estimated daily dose of vapour to the cells in only an hour, which is unlikely to represent levels a consumer would experience. Additionally, the daily dose was calculated by assuming that 100% of vapour is deposited in the lungs.

The amount of particulate mass from the aerosols deposited on the cells' surface was also measured to prove that different amounts of smoke or vapour had reached the cells even when there was no or minimal cytotoxic response.

These tests are part of a suite of tests being developed to test novel tobacco and nicotine products and could be used to help develop standards for these products in the future.

Many in the public health community believe e-cigarettes offer great potential for reducing the public health impact of smoking. Public Health England, an executive body of the UK Department of Health, recently published a report saying that e-cigarettes are 95% safer than cigarettes. The Royal College of Physicians have said that the public can be reassured that e-cigarettes are much safer then smoking and that they should be widely promoted as an alternative to cigarettes, though they also called for more research. Cancer Research UK, Action on Smoking and Health and the British Heart Foundation are also of the view that e-cigarettes are substantially less harmful than smoking.

R&D at British American Tobacco

Related Smoking Articles:

A case where smoking helped
A mutation in the hemoglobin of a young woman in Germany was found to cause her mild anemia.
No safe level of smoking
People who consistently smoked an average of less than one cigarette per day over their lifetime had a 64 percent higher risk of earlier death than people who never smoked.
Nearly half of women who stop smoking during pregnancy go back to smoking soon after baby is born
A major new review published today by the scientific journal Addiction reveals that in studies testing the effectiveness of stop-smoking support for pregnant women, nearly half (43 percent) of the women who managed to stay off cigarettes during the pregnancy went back to smoking within six months of the birth.
If you want to quit smoking, do it now
Smokers who try to cut down the amount they smoke before stopping are less likely to quit than those who choose to quit all in one go, Oxford University researchers have found.
Cochrane news: Have national smoking bans worked in reducing harms in passive smoking?
The most robust evidence yet, published today in the Cochrane Library, suggests that national smoking legislation does reduce the harms of passive smoking, and particularly risks from heart disease.
Advocating for raising the smoking age to 21
Henry Ford Hospital pulmonologist Daniel Ouellette, M.D., who during his 31-year career in medicine has seen the harmful effects of smoking on his patients, advocates for raising the smoking age to 21.
Stress main cause of smoking after childbirth
Mothers who quit smoking in pregnancy are more likely to light up again after their baby is born if they feel stressed.
As smoking declines, more are likely to quit
Smokeless tobacco and, more recently, e-cigarettes have been promoted as a harm reduction strategy for smokers who are 'unable or unwilling to quit.' The strategy, embraced by both industry and some public health advocates, is based on the assumption that as smoking declines overall, only those who cannot quit will remain.
Smoking around your toddler could be just as bad as smoking while pregnant
Children whose parents smoked when they were toddlers are likely to have a wider waist and a higher BMI by time they reach ten years of age, reveal researchers at the University of Montreal and its affiliated CHU Sainte Justine Research Centre.
Smoking and angioplasty: Not a good combination
Quitting smoking when you have angioplasty is associated with better quality of life and less chest pain.

Related Smoking Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#529 Do You Really Want to Find Out Who's Your Daddy?
At least some of you by now have probably spit into a tube and mailed it off to find out who your closest relatives are, where you might be from, and what terrible diseases might await you. But what exactly did you find out? And what did you give away? In this live panel at Awesome Con we bring in science writer Tina Saey to talk about all her DNA testing, and bioethicist Debra Mathews, to determine whether Tina should have done it at all. Related links: What FamilyTreeDNA sharing genetic data with police means for you Crime solvers embraced...