Statistician: Mammography Is A 'Lottery' In Women 40-50 Years Old

October 06, 1998

DURHAM, N.C. -- Few women in their 40s benefit from mammography screenings to detect breast cancer while many may suffer emotionally and physically from the consequences of unclear results, says a Duke University researcher in the Oct. 7 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Professor Donald Berry, of the Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, based that conclusion on a study of the findings of eight large clinical trials that compared women in their 40s who received mammograms with women who didn't.

Mammography screening is difficult in younger, pre-menopausal women because their breast tissue is often dense, and fat deposits are often diagnosed as suspicious tumors in a first screening. Berry said that often means a second mammogram needs to be taken, sometimes followed by a surgical biopsy to remove and test tissue for cancer -- a procedure that is often negative in women this age.

"Screening is a lottery. Any winnings are shared by the minority of women, about one in 60 or 70, who are diagnosed with breast cancer in their 40s," Berry said . "The overwhelming proportion of women experience no benefit and they pay with the time involved and the risks associated with screening."

Berry conducted his analysis to help guide women in their individual decision making. In his study, he found that having regular mammography from age 40 to 50 adds about five days to the life expectancy of each woman screened. The risk of not having a mammogram until after age 50 is about the same as "riding a bicycle for 15 hours without a helmet, or of gaining two ounces of body weight, and keeping it on," he said.

He said in an interview that women should carefully weigh recommendations for screenings because "mammograms are pushed by physicians and some members of the radiology community. Politics played a crucial role in the federal recommendations," he said. "Few medical issues have generated as much controversy as the question of whether to recommend regular mammograms to women aged 40 to 49."

Berry was a member of a National Institutes of Health advisory panel that in January 1997 neither endorsed nor recommended against mammograms for women this age, but concluded women should decide for themselves. But after an outcry from breast cancer advocates and Congressional members, the National Cancer Institute took a different view, recommending screenings every one or two years for 40-something women. The American Cancer Society recommends them every year.

Berry studied the eight large clinical trials following the advisory panel conclusions. The trials compared women in their 40s who received mammograms with women who didn't. Altogether, these trials enrolled 200,000 women in the United States, Canada, Scotland and Sweden. When considered together in a meta-analysis, the studies conclude that approximately15 years after the trials ended, women who were screened had 18 percent fewer breast cancer deaths compared to women of the same age who weren't screened.

While that number sounds impressive, it isn't when put in context, Berry said. In the women followed, 689 died of breast cancer. Of that group, 326 had a mammogram while in their 40s and 363 didn't. After accounting for different numbers of total women in the two arms of the trials, the difference in mortality between the groups represents the18 percent reduction in death.

"The relevant question here is whether finding and treating breast cancer at an earlier time point extends women's lives or improves the quality of their lives," Berry said.

"Although some people feel passionately, no one knows for certain whether, or how much, getting mammograms before the age of 50 increases life expectancy," he said. "Some women die from breast cancer even if their cancers are small when detected by mammography." The difficulty with mammography is that no one can say for sure what the cancer that is detected will do, said Berry. "There is no universal answer," Berry concluded. "All women can do is to think carefully about the question and decide what is appropriate for themselves."
-end-


Duke University Medical Center

Related Breast Cancer Articles from Brightsurf:

Oncotarget: IGF2 expression in breast cancer tumors and in breast cancer cells
The Oncotarget authors propose that methylation of DVDMR represents a novel epigenetic biomarker that determines the levels of IGF2 protein expression in breast cancer.

Breast cancer: AI predicts which pre-malignant breast lesions will progress to advanced cancer
New research at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, could help better determine which patients diagnosed with the pre-malignant breast cancer commonly as stage 0 are likely to progress to invasive breast cancer and therefore might benefit from additional therapy over and above surgery alone.

Partial breast irradiation effective treatment option for low-risk breast cancer
Partial breast irradiation produces similar long-term survival rates and risk for recurrence compared with whole breast irradiation for many women with low-risk, early stage breast cancer, according to new clinical data from a national clinical trial involving researchers from The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G.

Breast screening linked to 60 per cent lower risk of breast cancer death in first 10 years
Women who take part in breast screening have a significantly greater benefit from treatments than those who are not screened, according to a study of more than 50,000 women.

More clues revealed in link between normal breast changes and invasive breast cancer
A research team, led by investigators from Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, details how a natural and dramatic process -- changes in mammary glands to accommodate breastfeeding -- uses a molecular process believed to contribute to survival of pre-malignant breast cells.

Breast tissue tumor suppressor PTEN: A potential Achilles heel for breast cancer cells
A highly collaborative team of researchers at the Medical University of South Carolina and Ohio State University report in Nature Communications that they have identified a novel pathway for connective tissue PTEN in breast cancer cell response to radiotherapy.

Computers equal radiologists in assessing breast density and associated breast cancer risk
Automated breast-density evaluation was just as accurate in predicting women's risk of breast cancer, found and not found by mammography, as subjective evaluation done by radiologists, in a study led by researchers at UC San Francisco and Mayo Clinic.

Blood test can effectively rule out breast cancer, regardless of breast density
A new study published in PLOS ONE demonstrates that Videssa® Breast, a multi-protein biomarker blood test for breast cancer, is unaffected by breast density and can reliably rule out breast cancer in women with both dense and non-dense breast tissue.

Study shows influence of surgeons on likelihood of removal of healthy breast after breast cancer dia
Attending surgeons can have a strong influence on whether a patient undergoes contralateral prophylactic mastectomy after a diagnosis of breast cancer, according to a study published by JAMA Surgery.

Young breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery see improved prognosis
A new analysis indicates that breast cancer prognoses have improved over time in young women treated with breast conserving surgery.

Read More: Breast Cancer News and Breast Cancer Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.