Nav: Home

How chromosomes change their shape during cell differentiation

October 09, 2019

The human genome is made up of 46 chromosomes, each of which has a length of about 100-200 million base pairs, base pairs being the building blocks of the DNA double helix. Even during interphase, the period in between the cell division phases, chromosomes are still tightly packed inside the cell nucleus. If one zooms in on each chromosome, a regular structural unit called the nucleosome is evident, which corresponds to a 146-base pair long strand of DNA wrapped around eight histone protein molecules. Until recently, no other regular structures beyond the nucleosomes were known.

Thanks to the emerging genomics-based technology called Hi-C (high-throughput chromosome conformation capture), however, we now know that there are regular structural units at the megabase scale, referring to millions of base pairs. It is now generally accepted that mammalian chromosomes are comprised of megabase-sized globular units called topologically associating domains (TADs), which are separated by boundaries, presumably in a beads-on-a-string manner. Further, multiple TADs assemble to form what are called A and B subnuclear compartments. TADs containing many active genes form A compartments, while TADs with few or no active genes form B compartments.

It is generally believed that TADs are stable units of the chromosomes and that their boundary positions do not change between cell types. By contrast, the organization of A/B compartments differs between cell types, meaning that the boundaries between them change during differentiation. However, nobody has ever observed changes in A/B compartments as they occurred.

Scientists from the RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research have now observed A/B compartment changes in detail during the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). They discovered many genomic regions that switched compartments, either from A to B or vice versa, which, interestingly, correlated well with the genomic regions that switched their replication timing (the temporal order of genomic DNA replication) from early to late or vice versa, respectively. A to B compartment changes were accompanied by movements from the nuclear interior to the periphery and by gene repression, while B to A compartment changes were accompanied by movements from the nuclear periphery to the interior and by gene activation. These results strongly suggest that A/B compartment changes represent physical movements of portions of chromosomes within the 3D nuclear space, accompanied by changes in gene expression and replication timing.

Regarding the temporal relationship between the physical movements of chromosomes and changes in gene expression and replication timing, the research team found that genomic regions that switched from B to A compartment clearly did so one to two days prior to gene activation, and that the changes in replication timing were from late to early. This raised an intriguing possibility that compartment changes might be a prerequisite for gene activation and replication timing changes.

The team went on to characterize the features of genomic regions that changed A/B compartments. Compartments were found to change primarily by the shifting of A/B compartment boundaries, while the emergence of new compartments--for example the emergence of an A compartment within a stretch of B compartment or vice versa--was rare. Because compartment boundaries corresponded to a subset of TAD boundaries, they looked at how many TADs changed compartments and discovered that the majority of the changes affected single TADs.

Importantly, this single-TAD-level switching of compartments was confirmed in single cells by a method, called single-cell Repli-seq, which was recently developed by the research team to analyze DNA replication regulation genome-wide in single cells (note that replication timing correlates very well with A/B compartments). The team also found that A/B compartment profiles changed gradually but uniformly within a differentiating cell population, with the cells transiently resembling the epiblast-derived stem cell (EpiSC) state, an advanced form of stem cells compared to ESCs.

Taken together, the team's finding suggests that A/B compartments change primarily by the relocation of single TADs facing the A/B compartment interface to the opposite compartment. "It is possible," says Ichiro Hiratani, the leader of the group, "that the accumulation of these compartment switching events may reflect or represent changes in differentiation states such as from ESCs to EpiSCs."

In this way, this study, published in Nature Genetics, explains how chromosomes undergo structural changes during cell differentiation. According to Hiratani, "Our study was the first to clearly demonstrate that changes in chromosome conformation preceded changes in DNA-based transactions such as gene expression and DNA replication timing. Intriguingly, chromosome conformation changes were regulated at the level of single TADs. We are eager to explore the basis of such single-TAD-level regulation of chromosomes and entertain the possibility of predicting DNA transactions based on preceding changes in chromosome structures."


Related Dna Articles:

A new spin on DNA
For decades, researchers have chased ways to study biological machines.
From face to DNA: New method aims to improve match between DNA sample and face database
Predicting what someone's face looks like based on a DNA sample remains a hard nut to crack for science.
Self-healing DNA nanostructures
DNA assembled into nanostructures such as tubes and origami-inspired shapes could someday find applications ranging from DNA computers to nanomedicine.
DNA design that anyone can do
Researchers at MIT and Arizona State University have designed a computer program that allows users to translate any free-form drawing into a two-dimensional, nanoscale structure made of DNA.
DNA find
A Queensland University of Technology-led collaboration with University of Adelaide reveals that Australia's pint-sized banded hare-wallaby is the closest living relative of the giant short-faced kangaroos which roamed the continent for millions of years, but died out about 40,000 years ago.
DNA structure impacts rate and accuracy of DNA synthesis
DNA sequences with the potential to form unusual conformations, which are frequently associated with cancer and neurological diseases, can in fact slow down or speed up the DNA synthesis process and cause more or fewer sequencing errors.
Changes in mitochondrial DNA control how nuclear DNA mutations are expressed in cardiomyopathy
Differences in the DNA within the mitochondria, the energy-producing structures within cells, can determine the severity and progression of heart disease caused by a nuclear DNA mutation.
Switching DNA and RNA on and off
DNA and RNA are naturally polarised molecules. Scientists believe that these molecules have an in-built polarity that can be reoriented or reversed fully or in part under an electric field.
New DNA synthesis technique promises rapid, high-fidelity DNA printing
Today, DNA is synthesized as an organic chemist would, using toxic chemicals and error-prone steps that limit accuracy and thus length to about 200 base pairs.
The changing shape of DNA
The shape of DNA can be changed with a range of triggers including copper and oxygen - according to new research from the University of East Anglia.
More Dna News and Dna Current Events

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Rethinking Anger
Anger is universal and complex: it can be quiet, festering, justified, vengeful, and destructive. This hour, TED speakers explore the many sides of anger, why we need it, and who's allowed to feel it. Guests include psychologists Ryan Martin and Russell Kolts, writer Soraya Chemaly, former talk radio host Lisa Fritsch, and business professor Dan Moshavi.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#538 Nobels and Astrophysics
This week we start with this year's physics Nobel Prize awarded to Jim Peebles, Michel Mayor, and Didier Queloz and finish with a discussion of the Nobel Prizes as a way to award and highlight important science. Are they still relevant? When science breakthroughs are built on the backs of hundreds -- and sometimes thousands -- of people's hard work, how do you pick just three to highlight? Join host Rachelle Saunders and astrophysicist, author, and science communicator Ethan Siegel for their chat about astrophysics and Nobel Prizes.