Video conferencing could increase shared decision-making in hospice care

October 12, 2015

COLUMBIA, Mo. While there is vast research on shared decision-making between patients and providers, little research exists on how providers and family caregivers reach mutual decisions -- a dynamic that is prominent in hospice care, a type of medical care given to patients near the end of their lives. Now, researchers at the University of Missouri have found that shared decision-making, although beneficial, could be enhanced in hospice care. The researchers recommend that health care workers employ measures such as video conferencing to help increase the likelihood of shared decision-making between patients and family caregivers.

"Patients in hospice care generally have less than six months to live, and some very important decisions need to be made during this time," said Debra Parker-Oliver, PhD, professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the MU School of Medicine and lead researcher on the study. "Shared decision-making is critical to patient-centered care because it helps ensure patients will receive care that is in line with their preferences and values. It is a process where decisions are jointly made between providers and patients, or in most hospice care cases, family caregivers."

Parker-Oliver and Karla Washington, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the MU School of Medicine and co-researcher on the study, reviewed video recordings of hospice team meetings that involved family caregivers. They found that shared decision-making occurs infrequently in hospice team meetings that involve family caregivers due to barriers such as time constraints, a lack of communication skills and unaddressed emotional needs. The researchers said hospice providers who want to include family caregivers in the decision-making process should consider using video conferencing to facilitate caregivers' participation.

"The quality of team meetings is enhanced when you have a visual image," Washington said. "It facilitates things like turn-taking and helps ensure meeting attendees are listening and engaged in the discussion."

Although researchers found that including family caregivers through video conferencing is a useful tool for shared decision-making, they say it does not guarantee shared decision-making will occur.

"Although shared decision-making is facilitated by having family caregivers participate in team meetings through video or Web conferencing, that alone does not mean shared decision-making will actually take place," Parker-Oliver said. "Specific steps need to be taken to ensure family caregivers participate in the decision-making process."

The study shows the need for more research on shared decision-making in hospice care, and the researchers believe that through more research, they can help hospice teams become more effective and engaged in more shared decision-making with patients' families.
The study, "A Multimethod Analysis of Shared Decision-making in Hospice Interdisciplinary Team Meetings Including Family Caregivers," recently was published in Palliative Medicine and was funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research and the National Cancer Institute. The content of the article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.

University of Missouri-Columbia

Related Decisions Articles from Brightsurf:

Consumers value difficult decisions over easy choices
In a paper co-authored by Gaurav Jain, an assistant professor of marketing in the Lally School of Management at Rensselaer, researchers found that disfluency, or the difficulty for an individual to process a message, increases people's attitudes toward that message after a time delay.

Evolutionary theory of economic decisions
When survival over generations is the end game, researchers say it makes sense to undervalue long shots that could be profitable and overestimate the likelihood of rare bad outcomes.

Decisions made for incapacitated patients often not what families want
Researchers from Regenstrief Institute and Indiana University report in a study published in JAMA Network Open that nearly half of the time medical treatments and orders received for incapacitated patients were not compatible with goals of care requested by their surrogate decision makers.

Which COVID-19 models should we use to make policy decisions?
A new process to harness multiple disease models for outbreak management has been developed by an international team of researchers.

For complex decisions, narrow them down to two
When choosing between multiple alternatives, people usually focus their attention on the two most promising options.

Fungal decisions can affect climate
Research shows fungi may slow climate change by storing more carbon.

How decisions unfold in a zebrafish brain
Researchers were able to track the activity of each neuron in the entire brain of zebrafish larvae and reconstruct the unfolding of neuronal events as the animals repeatedly made 'left or right' choices in a behavioral experiment.

Best of the best: Who makes the most accurate decisions in expert groups?
New method predicts accuracy on the basis of similarity.

How do brains remember decisions?
Mammal brains -- including those of humans -- store and recall impressive amounts of information based on our good and bad decisions and interactions in an ever-changing world.

How we make complex decisions
MIT neuroscientists have identified a brain circuit that helps break complex decisions down into smaller pieces.

Read More: Decisions News and Decisions Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to