Nav: Home

Researchers discover extensive mislabeling of gene expression samples

October 12, 2016

At least 1 in 3 gene expression studies contain mislabelled samples, according to a new study published in F1000Research. As correct identification of the samples is central to data analysis, studies based on data from mislabelled samples could reach incorrect conclusions.

After discovering labelling errors while reanalysing gene expression datasets from a Parkinson's disease study, Lilah Toker, Min Feng and Paul Pavlidis of the University of British Columbia decided to investigate how often these mistakes occur. Their findings, published in the F1000Research channel Preclinical Reproducibility & Robustness, have now passed peer review: http://f1000research.com/articles/5-2103/v1.

The researchers used an elegant approach to detect whether a sample was mislabelled by assessing the expression levels of genes on the sex-specific chromosomes: Females specifically express some genes located on the X chromosome, while only males express genes located on the Y chromosome. Expression level of the sex-specific genes can be compared to the sex stated on the sample's label to determine if mislabelling has occurred.

Of 70 human tissue datasets studied, comprising 4,043 samples in total, the team found that 46% datasets contained at least one discrepancy between the sample's sex-specific gene expression levels and the sex written on the label. Based on this data they calculate that at least 33%, and up to 60%, of all gene expression studies contain mislabelled samples. The authors note this might be only a snapshot of a wider problem, as their method cannot detect cases where the mislabelling did not affect the sex of the sample - such as a wrong tissue sample or a mix-up of two samples from two subjects with the same sex).

The authors explored at which stage of data collection, analysis or report the mislabelling occurred. While in majority of the cases the exact origin could not be identified, the authors found that mislabellings were often already present at the stage of data analysis, and in several cases the mislabelling was traced back to laboratory test tube mix-ups.

Lilah Toker said: "Researchers have long been aware of the value of sex markers for quality control, so it was surprising to find such obvious problems in so many studies. We hope our study encourages greater diligence."

Leonard P. Freedman of the Global Biological Standards Institute in Washington DC, who openly reviewed the paper, said: "This is an excellent paper highlighting the importance of sample annotation as a critical contributor to reproducible research."

Hans van Bokhoven of the Radboud University Medical Center, who also approved the article as a reviewer, said: "While these figures are already alarming, the actual number of mismatches is likely to be higher, because the gender-analysis can only identify discrepancies based on a gender-mismatch and will not detect mislabelling of samples of the same gender and case-control samples."

As inaccurate labelling has the potential to seriously undermine the validity and reuse of gene expression data, the authors argue that such sex-specific gene expression checks should become routine.
-end-


Faculty of 1000

Related Chromosome Articles:

How cells combat chromosome imbalance
MIT biologists have now identified a mechanism that the immune system uses to eliminate genetically imbalanced cells from the body.
For keeping X chromosomes active, chromosome 19 marks the spot
After nearly 40 years of searching, Johns Hopkins researchers report they have identified a part of the human genome that appears to block an RNA responsible for keeping only a single X chromosome active when new female embryos are formed, effectively allowing for the generally lethal activation of more than one X chromosome during development.
Discovery of a novel chromosome segregation mechanism during cell division
When cells divide, chromosomes need to be evenly segregated. This equal distribution is important to accurately pass genetic information to the next generation.
New steps in the meiosis chromosome dance
Where would we be without meiosis and recombination? A new paper published online Jan.
How well do we understand the relation between incorrect chromosome number & cancer?
Researchers at CSHL and MIT report surprising results of experiments intended to explore the consequences of having too many or too few chromosomes, a phenomenon that biologists call aneuploidy.
Understanding X-chromosome silencing in humans
Researchers have discovered new insights into how one of the two X-chromosomes is silenced during the development of female human embryos and also in lab-grown stem cells.
Only half of a chromosome is DNA, 3-D imaging study shows
DNA makes up only half of the material inside chromosomes -- far less than was previously thought -- a study has revealed.
Ultrastructure of a condensed chromosome-like structure in a cyanobacterium
Researchers have discovered that the photosynthetic cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongates PCC 7942 shows eukaryotic condensed chromosome-like DNA compaction prior to cell division if cultivated under rigorous light/dark cycles and have successfully visualized the ultrastructure of the compacted DNA by means of high-voltage cryo-electron tomography.
X chromosome: The structure makes the difference
In male cells of the fruit fly Drosophila, the X chromosome is twice as active as in female cells.
Loss of Y chromosome is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease
The loss of the Y chromosome in batches of cells over time continues to develop as one biological explanation for why men, on average, live shorter lives than women.

Related Chromosome Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Anthropomorphic
Do animals grieve? Do they have language or consciousness? For a long time, scientists resisted the urge to look for human qualities in animals. This hour, TED speakers explore how that is changing. Guests include biological anthropologist Barbara King, dolphin researcher Denise Herzing, primatologist Frans de Waal, and ecologist Carl Safina.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#532 A Class Conversation
This week we take a look at the sociology of class. What factors create and impact class? How do we try and study it? How does class play out differently in different countries like the US and the UK? How does it impact the political system? We talk with Daniel Laurison, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Swarthmore College and coauthor of the book "The Class Ceiling: Why it Pays to be Privileged", about class and its impacts on people and our systems.