Nav: Home

Study: Break the attachment before selling your stuff

October 16, 2017

Ever tried to sell something you've owned for a while on Craigslist and found that no one is willing to pony up what you're asking?

It's because you're asking too much.

Economists have long studied this phenomenon -- people overvaluing an object simply because they own it -- but few agree on why exactly it happens. Academics even have a name for it: the "WTA-WTP disparity," meaning the difference in a seller's "willingness to accept" and a buyer's "willingness to pay."

In an effort to better understand this fascinating human behavior, BYU marketing professor Tamara Masters and her coauthors Arul Mishra and Himanshu Mishra from the University of Utah, decided to go outside economic principles and apply a bit of neuroscience and psychology. Their study, appearing in the Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology and Economics, finds that people who are asking too much for something are experiencing both physical attachment and loss aversion to that object.

"If you're finding that no one is willing to buy something from you for the price you're asking, then your price is wrong," Masters said. "You're too attached and you don't want to lose it."

Being "too attached" means that possession of an item changes someone's perceptions of an object, leading them to actually see it as a reflection or extension of themselves. Meanwhile, loss aversion is when the pain of losing an object is greater than the pleasure of gaining it.

For her study, Masters manipulated subjects so that many of them developed an actual physical attachment to an object -- in this case, a mug. To do this, she adapted a well-known visual-tactile experiment from neuroscience where a participant put their hand in a box with the mug placed on top. The researcher then tapped the mug with one hand (which the participant saw) while simultaneously tapping the subject's hand inside the box (which they felt).

Those participants, of which there were more than 400, were then shown the same mug and asked to name a selling price. They found those who reported developing a unique sensation or attachment to the mug asked for much more money ($6.00) than those who did not gain that attachment ($4.77).

"We have biases we don't even know that we have that affect our decisions," Masters said. "If you find personal attachment or hate to let go of things that become yours, you will struggle to sell them at market value. Some people get attached to objects and others hate losing objects. If you have both of these things, you will sell them for much more than buyers in the market think they are worth."

This is often the case with entrepreneurs, she said. Since entrepreneurs put a lot of personal effort -- "blood, sweat and tears" -- into their products, they tend to perceive them as having a higher value than they actually do to the consumer.

So, a bit of advice to those looking to make a few bucks from the classifieds: Don't become attached to things and don't be afraid to lose them.

"Easier said than done," Masters said.
-end-


Brigham Young University

Related Neuroscience Articles:

The evolution of neuroscience as a research
When the first issue of the JDR was published, the field of neuroscience did not exist but over subsequent decades neuroscience has emerged as a scientific field that has particular relevance to dentistry.
Diabetes-Alzheimer's link explored at Neuroscience 2019
Surprising links exist between diabetes and Alzheimer's disease, and researchers are beginning to unpack the pathology that connects the two.
Organoid research revealed at Neuroscience 2019
Mini-brains, also called organoids, may offer breakthroughs in clinical research by allowing scientists to study human brain cells without a human subject.
The neuroscience of autism: New clues for how condition begins
UNC School of Medicine scientists found that a gene mutation linked to autism normally works to organize the scaffolding of brain cells called radial progenitors necessary for the orderly formation of the brain.
Harnessing reliability for neuroscience research
Neuroscientists are amassing the large-scale datasets needed to study individual differences and identify biomarkers.
Blue Brain solves a century-old neuroscience problem
In a front-cover paper published in Cerebral Cortex, EPFL's Blue Brain Project, a Swiss Brain Research Initiative, explains how the shapes of neurons can be classified using mathematical methods from the field of algebraic topology.
Characterizing pig hippocampus could improve translational neuroscience
Researchers have taken further steps toward developing a superior animal model of neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injury and epilepsy, according to a study of miniature pigs published in eNeuro.
The neuroscience of human vocal pitch
Among primates, humans are uniquely able to consciously control the pitch of their voices, making it possible to hit high notes in singing or stress a word in a sentence to convey meaning.
Study tackles neuroscience claims to have disproved 'free will'
For several decades, some researchers have argued that neuroscience studies prove human actions are driven by external stimuli -- that the brain is reactive and free will is an illusion.
New approaches in neuroscience show it's not all in your head
Our own unique experiences shape how we view the world and respond to the events in our lives.
More Neuroscience News and Neuroscience Current Events

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2019.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

In & Out Of Love
We think of love as a mysterious, unknowable force. Something that happens to us. But what if we could control it? This hour, TED speakers on whether we can decide to fall in — and out of — love. Guests include writer Mandy Len Catron, biological anthropologist Helen Fisher, musician Dessa, One Love CEO Katie Hood, and psychologist Guy Winch.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#542 Climate Doomsday
Have you heard? Climate change. We did it. And it's bad. It's going to be worse. We are already suffering the effects of it in many ways. How should we TALK about the dangers we are facing, though? Should we get people good and scared? Or give them hope? Or both? Host Bethany Brookshire talks with David Wallace-Wells and Sheril Kirschenbaum to find out. This episode is hosted by Bethany Brookshire, science writer from Science News. Related links: Why Climate Disasters Might Not Boost Public Engagement on Climate Change on The New York Times by Andrew Revkin The other kind...
Now Playing: Radiolab

An Announcement from Radiolab