Nav: Home

Researchers create method to evaluate profitability of service amenities

October 19, 2016

COLLEGE PARK, Md. - Say you're a hotel manager trying to decide whether to build a pool: Will the additional reservations you bring in from that amenity offset the cost of construction and maintenance? Or say you offer free bottled water to all guests. If you stopped doing so, would you save money in the long run?  

Researchers at the University of Maryland and Georgetown and Cornell Universities offer some answers to these questions. Their work focuses on amenities -- free "extras" -- offered by hotels, but could be applied to extras offered by other kinds of businesses, too. "Our study shows that such amenities can be quite profitable, but that this varies from brand to brand," says Roland Rust, Distinguished University Professor and David Bruce Smith Chair in Marketing at UMD's Robert H. Smith School of Business.

"Return on Service Amenities," is forthcoming in the Journal of Marketing Research and co-authored by Rust, Michel Wedel, a Distinguished University Professor and the PepsiCo Chair in Consumer Science at the Smith School; Rebecca Hamilton at Georgetown's McDonough School of Business; and Chekitan S. Dev at Cornell's School of Hotel Administration.

Most previous work on amenities examined how they affected initial consumer choice, but this study went further by incorporating profits from return visits into the calculations. It focused on bottled water, Wi-Fi, and fitness centers -- amenities with very different costs and different (if overlapping) audiences.

In all three cases, the freely offered goods paid for themselves for many hotel brands -- the bottled water and Wi-Fi within a year, the fitness center over the long term. (For one hotel, however, even the gym paid for itself, and then some, within a year.) But the methodology offers a way to identify amenities that are pointless expenditures, too. And it's simple enough to run in a spreadsheet.

The study drew on a survey of 5,090 business and leisure travelers who were presented with choices between hotels with different features; they varied on price, convenience, loyalty programs, and the presence or absence of the three amenities. The researchers also partnered with a global hotel company -- one that oversees several brands -- to survey people before and after they completed their stay: 782 people answered questions about whether they expected to use certain amenities and, after the fact, whether they had done so. That allowed researchers to link actual usage with return visits. The surveys included customers at six hotel brands, ranging from "upscale" to "luxury," in different parts of the country. Those data, in turn, were linked to information about revenue generated by the stays of those same consumers.

Of the three amenities, free Wi-Fi had the largest effect on initial consumer choice. Across the six brands, it boosted the chance a hotel would be selected anywhere from 2 percent to 17 percent. There was only a slight effect on repeat visits, however. Overall, ROI was positive for five of the six brands, even in the first year.

In contrast, free bottled water had a weak effect on initial choice, but for three of six brands the effect on return visits was high. As a result, the ROI, within a year, for free bottled water was also positive for five of the six brands.

The story was very different for fitness centers, which are much more expensive to provide, with installation costs of at least $125,000. As a result, the ROI was negative for the first year for five of the six brands. The sixth had a strong payback, even in one year. While plenty of consumers value gyms, it was the high up-front investment that meant it took longer for them to pay for themselves.

The authors buttressed their survey results with data from the field: They looked at 517 hotel properties, comparing those that introduced the bottled water during a given period to those that did not. The study found that adding bottled water increased revenue by 2.2 percent.

"Using our methodology," Rust and his co-authors write," a service provider can evaluate the profitability of offering a particular service amenity based on its effects on both initial choice and repeat purchases to consider its return on investment," the authors write.
The research was supported by grants from the Center for Excellence in Service, at the University of Maryland's Smith School. Rust is Executive Director of the center.

A digital, full copy of "Return on Service Amenities" is available to reporters by contacting Greg Muraski at or 301-892-0973.

University of Maryland

Related Brands Articles:

Research suggests sexual appeals in ads don't sell brands, products
Ads with sexual appeals are more likely to be remembered but don't sell the brand or product, according to a meta-analysis of nearly 80 advertising studies, published online this week by the International Journal of Advertising.
Recognizing food brands puts preschoolers at risk for obesity
Young children who recognize food name brands, such as Lucky Charms, M&M's and Cheetos, often eat unhealthy items that lead to their high body mass index.
Struggling with different work identities? Your work may suffer
Few people are just one person at work. You may be both a manager and an employee.
Using brands to vent relationship frustration
When partners who are lower in relationship power feel frustrated with their significant others, they are more likely to buy something that is opposite to what their partners prefer.
Outlining a strategy for supermarket coupons
Among the major tools of supermarket promotions are coupons, but understanding which types of coupons accomplish the retailer's objectives can be tricky.
Eco-friendly store brands are a 'win-win-win situation'
A new study published in the Journal of Retailing by researchers with Concordia University in Montreal shows profits for store brands can increase if companies couple ethical marketing with higher prices.
Tying lipstick smears from crime scenes to specific brands (video)
It's a common TV show trope: detectives find a lipstick mark at a crime scene, they send a sample to the lab, and suddenly they have a lead.
Gamers don't notice the ads when they're busy killing
When people playing violent video games focus on killing and maiming, they don't often remember the corporate brands they see along the way.
Can performance brands cause a placebo effect?
A common marketing message from consumer brands is 'you will perform better with us.' A group of researchers set out to determine whether using performance brands such as Nike and 3M had any measurable affect on consumers' output.

Related Brands Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Climate Crisis
There's no greater threat to humanity than climate change. What can we do to stop the worst consequences? This hour, TED speakers explore how we can save our planet and whether we can do it in time. Guests include climate activist Greta Thunberg, chemical engineer Jennifer Wilcox, research scientist Sean Davis, food innovator Bruce Friedrich, and psychologist Per Espen Stoknes.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#527 Honey I CRISPR'd the Kids
This week we're coming to you from Awesome Con in Washington, D.C. There, host Bethany Brookshire led a panel of three amazing guests to talk about the promise and perils of CRISPR, and what happens now that CRISPR babies have (maybe?) been born. Featuring science writer Tina Saey, molecular biologist Anne Simon, and bioethicist Alan Regenberg. A Nobel Prize winner argues banning CRISPR babies won’t work Geneticists push for a 5-year global ban on gene-edited babies A CRISPR spin-off causes unintended typos in DNA News of the first gene-edited babies ignited a firestorm The researcher who created CRISPR twins defends...