Babies born after surgery on eggs

October 20, 2004

TWENTY children have been born after doctors performed a kind of transplant surgery on the eggs of their mothers, for whom normal IVF had failed. But other experts are concerned about the long-term safety of the technique. The technique, developed by Chii-Ruey Tzeng's team at Taipei Medical University in Taiwan, involves adding more of the power-generating components of cells, called mitochondria, to eggs. The team extract mitochondria from the granulosa cells that surround eggs and inject around 3000 into each egg. This addition has a dramatic effect. In a group of women for whom IVF and ICSI had failed, it boosted the pregnancy rate per cycle from 6 to 35 per cent, Tzeng told a meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in Philadelphia this week. Mitochondria are unusual because they contain their own DNA, and Tzeng thinks the method works by replacing those with damaged DNA. In eggs, mitochondria have only one copy of this DNA, making them vulnerable to damage as women age.

In contrast, mitochondria in the granulosa cells have around five copies. Because the method involves adding a woman's own mitochondria to her eggs, it is likely to be less controversial than using mitochondria from other women, where children would inherit about 40 of the 25,000 human genes from the donor. In 2001, the Food and Drug Administration intervened to stop Jacques Cohen's team at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science in Saint Barnabas, New Jersey, injecting cytoplasm, which includes mitochondria, from one woman's egg into another's. At least 30 children were born this way. And a woman in China became pregnant with triplets after the nuclei of her eggs were transferred into donor eggs before fertilisation, meaning all the children's mitochondria would have come from the donor, had they survived (New Scientist, 18 October 2003, p 12).

Last week, Doug Turnbull and Mary Herbert at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne in the UK applied for permission to use nuclear transfer to prevent children inheriting diseases caused by mitochondrial mutations in their mothers. Pressure groups attacked the idea as an unacceptable step towards genetic engineering of humans. Cohen says Tzeng's work is impressive, but he has concerns. He points out that we do not understand the consequences of moving mitochondria from one cell type to another. For instance, in eggs and early embryos mitochondria do not replicate, while they do in granulosa cells. More seriously, he says the group should have done more extensive experiments on animals to evaluate the long-term health effects. "I think that work needs to happen," Cohen says. "Then they would have much better ground to stand on."
-end-
Written by James Randerson, Philadelphia

This article appears in New Scientist issue: 23 October 2004

PLEASE MENTION NEW SCIENTIST AS THE SOURCE OF THIS STORY AND, IF PUBLISHING ONLINE, PLEASE CARRY A HYPERLINK TO: http://www.newscientist.com "These articles are posted on this site to give advance access to other authorised media who may wish to quote extracts as part of fair dealing with this copyrighted material. Full attribution is required, and if publishing online a link to www.newscientist.com is also required. Advance permission is required before any and every reproduction of each article in full - please contact celia.thomas@rbi.co.uk. Please note that all material is copyright of Reed Business Information Limited and we reserve the right to take such action as we consider appropriate to protect such copyright."

New Scientist

Related DNA Articles from Brightsurf:

A new twist on DNA origami
A team* of scientists from ASU and Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) led by Hao Yan, ASU's Milton Glick Professor in the School of Molecular Sciences, and director of the ASU Biodesign Institute's Center for Molecular Design and Biomimetics, has just announced the creation of a new type of meta-DNA structures that will open up the fields of optoelectronics (including information storage and encryption) as well as synthetic biology.

Solving a DNA mystery
''A watched pot never boils,'' as the saying goes, but that was not the case for UC Santa Barbara researchers watching a ''pot'' of liquids formed from DNA.

Junk DNA might be really, really useful for biocomputing
When you don't understand how things work, it's not unusual to think of them as just plain old junk.

Designing DNA from scratch: Engineering the functions of micrometer-sized DNA droplets
Scientists at Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) have constructed ''DNA droplets'' comprising designed DNA nanostructures.

Does DNA in the water tell us how many fish are there?
Researchers have developed a new non-invasive method to count individual fish by measuring the concentration of environmental DNA in the water, which could be applied for quantitative monitoring of aquatic ecosystems.

Zigzag DNA
How the cell organizes DNA into tightly packed chromosomes. Nature publication by Delft University of Technology and EMBL Heidelberg.

Scientists now know what DNA's chaperone looks like
Researchers have discovered the structure of the FACT protein -- a mysterious protein central to the functioning of DNA.

DNA is like everything else: it's not what you have, but how you use it
A new paradigm for reading out genetic information in DNA is described by Dr.

A new spin on DNA
For decades, researchers have chased ways to study biological machines.

From face to DNA: New method aims to improve match between DNA sample and face database
Predicting what someone's face looks like based on a DNA sample remains a hard nut to crack for science.

Read More: DNA News and DNA Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.