Despite rarity of errors in chemotherapy orders, improvements still needed, study finds

October 24, 2005

BOSTON --- In one of the first studies to examine chemotherapy errors in ambulatory care for cancer patients, researchers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) have found that about three percent of chemotherapy orders in three outpatient infusion clinics studied contained mistakes. Most of the errors were intercepted by nurses and pharmacists before reaching patients, and none were life-threatening or caused patient harm; but the results show that room for improvement exists even in hospitals with strong error-prevention programs, the authors say.

The research, reported in today's online version of the journal Cancer (http://www.interscience.wiley.com/cancer-newsroom), was made possible by Dana-Farber and BWH leaders' decision to share drug-order and patient-safety records with investigators. Both hospitals are established leaders in efforts to reduce medication errors and heighten patient safety. The findings of the study have prompted both Dana-Farber and Brigham and Women's to make changes in the hospital's automated drug order-entry system to further lessen the chance of mistakes.

"Our results show that while safeguards such as computerized order-entry systems -- used at both Dana-Farber and Brigham and Women's -- significantly reduce drug-order errors, additional improvements are still possible, and necessary" says the study's co-lead author, Tejal Gandhi, MD, MPH, of Brigham and Women's.

Adds co-lead author Sylvia Bartel, RPh, MHP, of Dana-Farber, "DFCI's leadership supported the in-depth review of all medication orders to gain information about potential system defects. The goal was to utilize the results of the study to make system improvements and ensure a safe medication process for our patients."

Previous studies have estimated that about five percent of drug orders for hospitalized patients have errors, but much less scientific attention has been given to the prevalence of such mistakes in outpatient settings. While medication errors often don't harm patients, the complexity of some chemotherapy regimens, and the toxicity of the drugs, makes it particularly important to minimize mistakes in ordering and administering cancer therapies.

In the current study, Gandhi, Bartel, and their colleagues from BWH, Dana-Farber, and the Harvard School of Public Health reviewed more than 10,000 medication orders from Dana-Farber's adult and pediatric ambulatory oncology infusion clinics, which used a computerized or paper medication-ordering system, respectively. Using a strict definition of error, they found that three percent of the orders contained errors, one-third of which were deemed serious.

Rating the errors by severity, researchers determined that 82 percent of the errors in adults and 60 percent in children had potential for harm to patients. Pharmacists and nurses caught 45 percent of the potentially harmful errors before they reached patients, and none of the errors actually caused patient harm.

In the adult clinics, which used a computer-aided ordering system, and the pediatric clinic, where a paper-based ordering system was in place, the most frequent errors involved omitted or incorrect dosages and failure to discontinue orders.

To reduce the chances of future medication order errors, officials at DFCI have instituted several changes. In the pediatric clinic, orders are now placed via computer. In the adult clinics, physicians now use a more sophisticated computer application with more of the drug-ordering information embedded within it. For medications that are usually given in tandem, the program now requires physicians to order both at the same time.

Co-authors of the study are Lawrence Shulman, MD, Deborah Verrier, RN, Angela Cleary, RN, of Dana-Farber; Elisabeth Burdick, MS, Jeffrey Rothschild, MD, MPH, and David Bates, MD, MSc, of Brigham and Women's; and Lucian Leape, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health.
-end-
The study was supported by a grant from the Harvard Risk Management Foundation.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is a principal teaching affiliate of the Harvard Medical School and is among the leading cancer research and care centers in the United States. It is a founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC), designated a comprehensive cancer center by the National Cancer Institute.

Brigham and Women's Hospital is a 755-bed non-profit teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School and a founding member of the Partners HealthCare system, a integrated health-care delivery network. Internationally recognized as a leading academic health-care institution, BWH is committed to excellence in patient care, medical research, and the training and education of health-care professionals.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Related Cancer Patients Articles from Brightsurf:

Higher risk of death in cancer patients with COVID-19 may be due to advanced age and more pre-existing conditions, rather than cancer itself
New research presented at this this week's ESCMID Conference on Coronavirus Diseases (ECCVID, online 23-25 September) suggests that the poor outcomes and higher death rates in cancer patients with COVID-19 could be due to them generally being older and having more underlying conditions, rather than due to the cancer itself.

The Lancet: Prostate cancer study finds molecular imaging could transform management of patients with aggressive cancer
Results from a randomised controlled trial involving 300 prostate cancer patients find that a molecular imaging technique is more accurate than conventional medical imaging and recommends the scans be introduced into routine clinical practice.

The art of cancer caregiving: How art therapies benefits those caring for cancer patients
A recent Drexel University study showed coloring and open-studio art therapy benefits stressed caregivers of cancer patients.

Stress in cervical cancer patients associated with higher risk of cancer-specific mortality
Psychological stress was associated with a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality in women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Cancer tissue-freezing approach may help more breast cancer patients in lower income countries
A new reusable device created by the Johns Hopkins University can help women with breast cancer in lower income countries by using carbon dioxide, a widely available and affordable gas, to power a cancer tissue-freezing probe instead of industry-standard argon.

Lots of patients with cancer, cancer survivors use but don't report complementary/alternative medicine therapies
This study used data from a nationwide survey to estimate how many patients with cancer and cancer survivors use complementary and alternative medicines (CAMS) in addition to or instead of conventional therapies, and how many don't disclose that to their physicians.

Colorectal cancer in patients with early onset is distinct from that in older patients
New research indicates that colorectal cancer diagnosed at an early age has clinical and genetic features that are different from those seen in traditional colorectal cancer diagnosed later in life.

Comparable risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism between patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism and patients with cancer
Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) carry a high risk of recurrence.

Personalized cancer vaccine may increase long-term survival in patients with deadly brain cancer
An international Phase III study led by researchers at UCLA has found that a personalized GBM vaccine may increase long-term survival in some patients.

Ovarian cancer drug shows promise in pancreatic cancer patients with BRCA mutation
A targeted therapy that has shown its power in fighting ovarian cancer in women including those with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations may also help patients with aggressive pancreatic cancer who harbor these mutations and have few or no other treatment options.

Read More: Cancer Patients News and Cancer Patients Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.