Nav: Home

High European mortality rates compared to US raise questions about sepsis care

October 24, 2012

Severe sepsis is a life-threatening illness caused by the immune system over-reacting to an infection, and it may develop into septic shock if allowed to progress, interfering with the function of the body's vital organs and causing a dangerous drop in blood pressure. Approximately 30% of people who acquire severe sepsis die as a result of the condition. Around 30 000 cases of severe sepsis are thought to occur in the UK every year, and the number seems to be rising.*

An international team of researchers studied records of more than 25 000 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in 186 sites across the USA and Europe. They found that there were 12% more deaths from sepsis-related causes in European hospitals, although when these data were adjusted for factors such as the origin of the sepsis and type of organ failure, the difference in mortality rates between the USA and Europe was not significant.

The study, which is the first ever to directly compare outcomes between the USA and Europe in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, was designed to assess whether hospitals were complying with international targets and guidelines for sepsis care, referred to collectively as the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. However, secondary outcomes of the study included hospital mortality, length of stay in hospital and length of stay in Intensive Care (ICU), and the researchers found striking disparities between each of these indicators.

In the USA, the majority (65%) of patients were admitted to ICU from the emergency department, whereas in Europe, just over half (52%) of patients were admitted to ICU from general wards. Patients tended to stay in ICU for longer in Europe, with the average length of stay being 1 day, compared to just a few hours (0.1 days) in the USA.

The researchers say that the difference in unadjusted average mortality rates between the two continents does not necessarily reflect a poorer standard of care in European Hospitals, but could simply reflect different approaches to critical care, whereby European patients tend to be admitted to ICU when they are sicker, and therefore more likely to die.

However, according to lead author Professor Mitchell Levy, at Rhode Island Hospital and The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, USA, "These results raise important questions about the effect of the approach to critical care in Europe compared with that in the USA. Given the higher number of ICU beds per head in the USA than in Europe, more patients with less serious cases of sepsis might be admitted to the ICU. However, this is not at all clear from existing research, and further investigation is urgently needed if we are to be able to accurately monitor, and ultimately improve, sepsis care."**

In a linked Comment, Dr Julian Bion at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK, writes that "The investigators identified important international differences in processes and outcomes of care, which, taken together, provide a convincing argument for the need to address variation in structure and process to reduce mortality from this lethal and complex disease."
-end-
NOTES TO EDITORS:

* Source: NHS Choices - Sepsis http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Blood-poisoning/Pages/Introduction.aspx?url=Pages/What-is-it.aspx (accessed October 18, 2012)

** Quote direct from author and cannot be found in text of Article.

Lancet

Related Sepsis Articles:

Readily available drug cocktail can help prevent sepsis shock and death
Even in advanced medical settings, sepsis is still very dangerous and accounts for over 400,000 deaths annually in the US alone.
A rusty and sweet side of sepsis
A research team led by Miguel Soares at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (IGC) in Portugal discovered an unsuspected mechanism that is protective against sepsis.
New pediatric protocol reduces missed sepsis diagnoses by 76 percent
An electronic sepsis alert using a combination of vital signs, risk factors and physician judgment to identify children in a pediatric emergency department with severe sepsis reduced missed diagnoses by 76 percent.
Machine learning may help in early identification of severe sepsis
A machine-learning algorithm has the capability to identify hospitalized patients at risk for severe sepsis and septic shock using data from electronic health records (EHRs), according to a study presented at the 2017 American Thoracic Society International Conference.
Faster is better when it comes to sepsis care
An analysis covering nearly 50,000 patients from 149 New York hospitals is the first to offer scientific evidence that a controversial early sepsis care regulation worked.
Prompt sepsis treatment less likely when ERs overcrowded
According to a new study, patients with sepsis, a life-threatening complication of an infection, had delays approaching one hour in being given antibiotics when seen in emergency rooms that were overcrowded.
New test to rapidly diagnose sepsis
Researchers have developed a test that can rapidly and reliably diagnose sepsis, a potentially life-threatening complication of bacterial infections.
Children who survive sepsis often experience lingering effects
Survival rates have risen dramatically in recent years among children who develop sepsis, a severe, life-threatening immune reaction to an infection somewhere in the body.
Recognize sepsis as a separate cause of illness and death
Sepsis should be recognized as a separate cause of illness and death around the world.
Simple measures cut sepsis deaths nearly in half
Sepsis, also called blood poisoning, is a common affliction that can affect people of all ages.

Related Sepsis Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Climate Crisis
There's no greater threat to humanity than climate change. What can we do to stop the worst consequences? This hour, TED speakers explore how we can save our planet and whether we can do it in time. Guests include climate activist Greta Thunberg, chemical engineer Jennifer Wilcox, research scientist Sean Davis, food innovator Bruce Friedrich, and psychologist Per Espen Stoknes.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#527 Honey I CRISPR'd the Kids
This week we're coming to you from Awesome Con in Washington, D.C. There, host Bethany Brookshire led a panel of three amazing guests to talk about the promise and perils of CRISPR, and what happens now that CRISPR babies have (maybe?) been born. Featuring science writer Tina Saey, molecular biologist Anne Simon, and bioethicist Alan Regenberg. A Nobel Prize winner argues banning CRISPR babies won’t work Geneticists push for a 5-year global ban on gene-edited babies A CRISPR spin-off causes unintended typos in DNA News of the first gene-edited babies ignited a firestorm The researcher who created CRISPR twins defends...