Nav: Home

World's top bodies representing the social and natural sciences vote to pursue a merger

October 24, 2016

At an extraordinary General Assembly of the International Council for Science (ICSU) and a General Assembly of the International Social Science Council (ISSC), the two organizations' members voted (overwhelmingly/by a narrow margin) that the two organizations should merge. This in-principle decision followed a recommendation by the two organizations' executives, setting the two councils on a trajectory to become one by October 2018.

For the plans to go ahead, the majority of both councils' voting members needed to vote in favour. 76% of the ICSU members and 87% of the ISSC members voted in favour of a merger of the two organizations, thereby setting the merger process in motion.

Alberto Martinelli, President of ISSC, said: "This is a historic moment for science. The decision for ISSC and ICSU to merge is the logical conclusion of an increasing collaboration between the two councils, and is in line with the course of developments in science over the past decades. By creating a unified international science council, we are removing many institutional obstacles and blazing a trail for unprecedented levels of cooperation among scientists and stakeholders everywhere, to better respond to global challenges."

Gordon McBean, President of ICSU, said: "ICSU has long been a champion for excellence in both disciplinary and transdisciplinary science, and seeks to bring that excellence together to address global challenges. Today's vote confirms support for this approach and I want to thank our Unions and National Members for their support. As a unified body, we will be in a stronger position to confront the challenges of the twenty-first century. With a broadened membership base the new organization will be the inclusive global voice of science that we want it to be."

Today's vote was an in-principle agreement to merge the two councils, and to establish a Transition Task Force to develop detailed transition plans, including legal requirements, new statutes and governance structures for the merged organization. The Task Force proposal will be put to a vote during a joint meeting of ICSU and ISSC Members in October 2017 at the 32nd ICSU General Assembly in Taipei. If the two organizations' members endorse these plans in 2017, the transition will be implemented and overseen by the ISSC and ICSU executives, with a founding General Assembly of the new organization tentatively planned for October 2018.

The merger will follow the recommendation of a joint working group on the relationship between the two Councils which worked between December 2015 and June 2016. Their final report recommended a merger, and this was subsequently unanimously endorsed by the executives of both organizations. Today's decision will lead to a new, fit-for-purpose 21st century international scientific organization that provides a unified, global voice for social and natural sciences, and a single institutional structure to enable and advance science for the future.

As part of today's meeting, the ICSU Members also voted to extend the mandates of their ICSU Executive Board, which would usually have expired in October 2017, until October 2018. In June, ISSC Members had already agreed to extend the term of office of the organization's current Executive Committee until completion of the merger process.

The meeting was generously hosted by the Research Council of Norway, a member of the ISSC.
About the organizations:

International Council for Science (ICSU)

ICSU is a non-governmental organisation with a global membership of national scientific bodies (122 members, representing 142 countries) and international scientific unions (31 members). ICSU mobilises the knowledge and resources of the international scientific community to strengthen international science for the benefit of society. []

International Social Science Council (ISSC)

ISSC is a membership-based non-governmental organization, and the primary global body representing the social sciences, including economic and behavioural sciences. Its mission is to strengthen social science to help solve global priority problems. Through its members and programmes, the ISSC reaches hundreds of thousands of individual social scientists working across a wide range of disciplines and representing all parts of the world. []

International Council for Science

Related Decision Articles:

For decision-makers who want the best, focus on the strategy
People make decisions every day, some trivial, like what to eat for lunch, while others are more significant -- career, marriage, buying a home.
Here's when powerful people have trouble making a decision
Although powerful people often tend to decide and act quickly, they become more indecisive than others when the decisions are toughest to make, a new study suggests.
Anatomy of a decision
A new atlas of gene expression during the earliest stages of life boosts studies of development.
Just made a bad decision?
Scientists at the University of Pittsburgh have discovered a mechanism for how anxiety may disrupt decision making.
EU decision process hinders use of genetically modified trees
Just like other crops, trees can be genetically modified in order to introduce new, useful characteristics.
Transparency key in decision to label modified ingredients
A Cornell University study found consumers are more supportive of labeling decisions when they believe the company considered the public's input in the process.
Decision making in action
The brain prepares multiple available movements before deciding between them, according to findings from Queen's researchers Jason Gallivan and Randy Flanagan.
Effect of decision aid in selecting antidepressant
Use of a decision aid helped primary care clinicians and patients with moderate to severe depression select antidepressants together but had no discernible effect on depression control and medication use and adherence, according to an article published online by JAMA Internal Medicine.
Psychology: Does aging affect decision making?
Aging is associated with significant decline in cognitive functions. But does this translate into poorer decision making?
New tool to connect geoscience information to decision makers
The Critical Issues Research Database seeks to connect end-users to the wealth of information available on issues at the intersection of geoscience and society such as the occurrence of natural resources, hazard mitigation and pollution risks.

Related Decision Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Failure can feel lonely and final. But can we learn from failure, even reframe it, to feel more like a temporary setback? This hour, TED speakers on changing a crushing defeat into a stepping stone. Guests include entrepreneur Leticia Gasca, psychology professor Alison Ledgerwood, astronomer Phil Plait, former professional athlete Charly Haversat, and UPS training manager Jon Bowers.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#524 The Human Network
What does a network of humans look like and how does it work? How does information spread? How do decisions and opinions spread? What gets distorted as it moves through the network and why? This week we dig into the ins and outs of human networks with Matthew Jackson, Professor of Economics at Stanford University and author of the book "The Human Network: How Your Social Position Determines Your Power, Beliefs, and Behaviours".