Nav: Home

Carpenter ants: When social instructions may be dangerous

October 25, 2016

Why do social beings sometimes put their own common sense aside to follow the lead of others, even though by doing so they could be brought to death's door? Research on carpenter ants (Camponotus mus) led by Roxana Josens of the University of Buenos Aires in Argentina is the first to show that so-called social information delivered by other ants often overrides an individual's assessment that a certain food source is toxic. The findings are published in Springer's journal Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

Social insects such as carpenter ants rely on sophisticated communication channels and on individual decision making to ensure that foraging as a group is done effectively. On the one hand, ants gather personal information through their first-hand experience of their environment or the quality of the food they find. Group members also share social information gathered by other nest members. This can be done when they swap food during the mouth-to-mouth exchange process called trophallaxis. It allows group members to pick up on odors and tastes, which they then go on to link with specific food stuffs.

Josens' team wanted to establish which type of information weighs most when carpenter ants forage for food: personal or social information. They therefore conducted a series of laboratory and field experiments to determine if a toxic substance, known to be a strong and harmful deterrent for carpenter ants, could become acceptable if it is associated with an odorant present in food being exchanged via trophallaxis. The team therefore exposed receiver ants to a toxic food (sugar-water mixed with boric acid) with the same odor they had previously learned about through trophallaxis.

Both experiments showed that ants can detect whether there is a toxic compound in a solution, and that they will reject it as a possible source of food. However, it was found that the odor experienced in a social trophallactic contact overrides individual ants' food assessment. This happens to such an extent that ants go on to collect the toxic food whenever the odor coincided with ones they learnt about from others, regardless of its harmful qualities. However, unscented toxic food was rejected by those ants that received no odor food by trophallaxis. Even more, the toxic food with odor was also rejected by ants that were confronted directly with this food and its odor because of their own first-hand experience and evaluation about the quality of the food source.

"Our results show how the assessment of a toxic food is overridden by social information," says Josens. She highlights the fact that these findings are contrary to those of most previous studies where social insects face a conflict between social instructions and individual experiences.

"In our work the individual information accessible to foragers was not a memory acquired in a previous foraging bout but their current individual sensing of toxic food when the decision of feed or not should be made," explains Josens. "The individual expectation generated by social information overrides the individual assessment of food toxicity."
Reference: Josens, R. et al. (2016). Food Information acquired socially overrides individual food assessment in ants, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. DOI 10.1007/s00265-016-2216-x


Related Ants Articles:

Using seaweed to kill invasive ants
Scientists at the University of California, Riverside have developed an inexpensive, biodegradable, seaweed-based ant bait that can help homeowners and farmers control invasive Argentine ant populations.
Ants rescue their injured
Ants operate a unique rescue system: when an insect is injured during a fight, it calls for help.
Wasps, ants, and Ani DiFranco
A University of California, Riverside graduate student has discovered several news species of wasps, including one that she named after musician Ani DiFranco.
Ants find their way even while traveling backward
Some of us struggle to find our way back home while walking from an unfamiliar location in the usual, forward direction.
Stabilizing evolutionary forces keep ants strong
Researchers are finding evidence of natural selection that maintains the status quo among ant populations.
Ants and epiphytes: A longstanding relationship
The first farmers on the Fijian archipelago were ants: For millions of years, an ant species on the islands has nurtured epiphytes, which provide them with nesting sites.
Carpenter ants: When social instructions may be dangerous
Why do social beings sometimes put their own common sense aside to follow the lead of others, even though by doing so they could be brought to death's door?
Are red imported fire ants all bad?
Red imported fire ants have earned a justifiably bad rap across the south and most Texans would be hard put to name a single redeeming quality the ants have.
Ants have dual navigation systems
Ants visually track the motion of objects as they move through their environment in order to determine the distance they have traveled, a new study reports.
Reversing ants navigate successfully despite going backwards
Desert ants are remarkable navigators, but how do they locate home when they have to shift into reverse when dragging a heavy load?

Related Ants Reading:

Best Science Podcasts 2019

We have hand picked the best science podcasts for 2019. Sit back and enjoy new science podcasts updated daily from your favorite science news services and scientists.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Digital Manipulation
Technology has reshaped our lives in amazing ways. But at what cost? This hour, TED speakers reveal how what we see, read, believe — even how we vote — can be manipulated by the technology we use. Guests include journalist Carole Cadwalladr, consumer advocate Finn Myrstad, writer and marketing professor Scott Galloway, behavioral designer Nir Eyal, and computer graphics researcher Doug Roble.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#529 Do You Really Want to Find Out Who's Your Daddy?
At least some of you by now have probably spit into a tube and mailed it off to find out who your closest relatives are, where you might be from, and what terrible diseases might await you. But what exactly did you find out? And what did you give away? In this live panel at Awesome Con we bring in science writer Tina Saey to talk about all her DNA testing, and bioethicist Debra Mathews, to determine whether Tina should have done it at all. Related links: What FamilyTreeDNA sharing genetic data with police means for you Crime solvers embraced...