Penn Researchers Find Negative Bias In Newspaper Coverage of Managed Care -- In "Media Vs. Managed Care," Media Takes Round #1

October 26, 1998

(Philadelphia, PA) -- Two-thirds of analyzed newspaper coverage of managed care organizations provided a negative representation of this growing form of health insurance, according to a study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Although the precise impact of the media's representation may be difficult to determine, one possible related outcome is that more than 1,000 anti-managed care, legislative initiatives have been proposed since the period of analysis. The study -- a detailed review of three months' worth of print coverage about HMOs (health maintenance organizations) in six leading daily newspapers -- appears in today's issue of Archives of Internal Medicine.

"In fully two-thirds of the analyzed cases, we believed that the articles portrayed a message so unfavorable that the reader was less likely to join, or might even decide to leave, a managed- care organization," explained lead author David J. Shulkin, MD, Chief Medical & Quality Officer at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. "This finding is especially troubling when one realizes that people's opinions are being negatively framed around an issue with which they have little familiarity or understanding," adds Shulkin. "This trend was important at the time we completed our study ... and it has even greater relevance today."

To determine message content, Shulkin and four research colleagues independently reviewed and scored 85 articles about managed-care that appeared during the last three months of 1995 in the following U.S. dailies: The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Washington Post, and The Boston Globe. All articles related predominantly to discussions of clinical quality, cost of care, resource utilization, or satisfaction with managed care. The researchers found that the content of seven articles (or 8% of the total) was thought likely to influence the reader so that they would be willing to join, or stay with, a managed care organization; in 57 articles (or 67%), the representation of managed care was so unfavorable that it might lead the reader to be less likely to join, or possibly even leave, a managed care organization; and 21 articles (or 25%) were considered to have little or no effect on the willingness of the reader to join or leave an HMO.

According to the study, the newspaper articles focused most of their content on patient concerns with managed care. Indeed, many of the print stories related patients' hostile encounters with HMOs -- typically as a result of being denied services perceived as necessary by the patient. Most of the articles concentrated on issues involving clinical quality (58%) and cost of care in a managed-care setting (56%). There was also frequent discussion of the adequacy of insurance coverage with managed care (38%), and physician concerns with managed care organizations (28%). Satisfaction with HMOs was a primary issue in approximately 25% of the articles reviewed.

"The public's perception of managed care is shaped by many factors, including the media," explains David B. Bernard, MD, Director of the Health and Disease Management Programs at Penn, and a co-author of the study. "This form of healthcare coverage will continue to grow as the public discourse over its positive and negative qualities continues as well. We believe that if the current negative representation of managed care continues in the press, we will see a widespread backlash of public opinion ...which will set the stage for even more political involvement in this area."
Contact:Rebecca Harmon
(215) 349-5660

Editor's Note: Dr. Shulkin can be reached directly at (215) 662-2271.

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Related Health Insurance Articles from Brightsurf:

Examining health insurance nondiscrimination policies with mental health among gender minority individuals
A large private health insurance database was used to examine the association between between health insurance nondiscrimination policies and mental health outcomes for gender minority individuals.

How common for cancer survivors to stay at jobs for health insurance?
This survey study looked at how often cancer survivors in the United States and their spouses or partners stay in their jobs because of concerns about losing their health insurance.

New health insurance insights
MIT economists analyze how patients and health care providers value Medicaid.

New health insurance benefit at U-M led to increased rates of IVF
In a new research letter appearing in JAMA detailing a first-of-its-kind study, a University of Michigan team compared the use of IVF among university employees before and after the addition of an insurance coverage benefit, finding a marked increase in the rate of use.

Financial hardship in cancer: The role of health insurance literacy
A new American Cancer Society study links health insurance literacy with medical financial hardship as well as non-medical financial sacrifices among adult cancer survivors in the United States.

Health insurance rule could help millions spend less for the care they need
Millions of Americans with chronic conditions could save money on the drugs and medical services they need the most, if their health insurance plans decide to take advantage of a new federal rule issued today.

Health insurance idea born at U-M could help millions of Americans spend less
New federal rule could reduce out-of-pocket costs for key drugs and services for people with chronic conditions in high-deductible health plans with health savings accounts.

Health insurance is not assurance of healthcare
Because of high out-of-pocket expenses, Ohioans who purchase subsidized health-exchange insurance often can't afford the care they need when they need it.

Study details poverty, lack of health insurance among female health care workers
A study carried out by researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania finds that low wages and poor benefits leave many female health care workers living below the poverty line.

Is TV advertising for health insurance worth the expense? A new study says, 'maybe not'
A new study to be published in the INFORMS journal Marketing Science has revealed that health insurance has a small effect on brand enrollments, raising the question of whether health insurance television advertising is worth the expense.

Read More: Health Insurance News and Health Insurance Current Events is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to