Cheaper drug could release more than £13.5 million a year within the next 5 years for other services

October 31, 2017

Doctors in the north east of England face legal action from two of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies for offering patients with a serious eye condition the choice of a safe, effective but much cheaper drug, reports The BMJ today.

Prescribing the cheaper drug could save the region's NHS up to £13.5m a year within the next five years. But drug companies Bayer and Novartis are threatening legal action, claiming it would breach a patient's legal right to an approved drug.

Some estimates suggest that a switch to bevacizumab for relevant eye conditions could save the NHS around £500 million per year.

Lucentis (ranibizumab) and aflibercept (Eylea) are licensed to treat wet age related macular degeneration (AMD) - a leading cause of blindness among older patients. Avastin (bevacizumab), is not licensed for wet AMD, but several publicly funded trials have shown that it is as safe and effective as aflibercept and ranibizumab.

Patients in the region will be told they could have ranibizumab and aflibercept if they would rather. They will also be told about how much cheaper bevacizumab is and the cost savings to the NHS.

However, both Bayer and Novartis spokespeople say that using unlicensed medicines instead of a licensed NICE approved option undermines the regulatory framework and NHS constitution. "Bayer feels it has to act to challenge the decision taken by these CCGs," a Bayer spokesperson said.

Allowing doctors to offer bevacizumab as the preferred treatment could save hundreds of millions of pounds every year that the NHS could re-invest in other frontline services. But prescribing an off-label drug goes against GMC prescribing guidance.

It is this guidance that doctors say has deterred them from prescribing bevacizumab despite the evidence of its efficacy and safety, and the financial strain on the NHS. Andrew Lotery, Professor of ophthalmology at Southampton University told The BMJ: "It's purely the regulatory framework that is stopping bevacizumab's widespread use in the NHS."

Back in 2015, The BMJ questioned the interpretation of European law that led to the GMC's stance. The advice appeared at odds with clinical practice in other European countries.

In 2014, Roche and Novartis were fined €180m by the European Court of Justice for allegedly colluding to prevent the use of bevacizumab by exaggerating the risks of using it to treat wet AMD and portraying ranibizumab as safer. The companies have challenged this at the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

But a recent opinion by a senior adviser to the ECJ suggests that off label drugs can be considered in place of licensed drugs for various reasons and this includes their price.

Faced with this news, the GMC said it is "sympathetic to the frustrations of doctors and organisations seeking to use resources effectively".

Assistant Director of Standards and Ethics Mary Agnew said: "We hope that some sort of licensing solution for drugs such as Avastin may be forthcoming, or alternatively that the situation is clarified in the courts to give doctors more assurance about when they can prescribe this drug safely and within the law."

Professor Lotery says his eye unit is experiencing "extreme pressure" due to a lack of capacity, as are other hospital eye services across the country. "Savings made by using bevacizumab should be reinvested into the hospital eye service to build capacity to deliver sight saving treatment for age-related macular degeneration," he argues.

In an accompanying commentary, Dr David Hambleton, Chief Officer at South Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), says offering patients the choice of bevacizumab could save the region's NHS up to £13.5m a year within the next five years, helping it to fund important medical treatment in other areas.

He argues that pharmaceutical companies "should not dictate which drugs are available to NHS patients. The choice between three clinically effective drugs should be one for NHS clinicians and patients to make together."

He is confident that EU drug marketing laws do not allow drug companies to restrict the ability of the NHS to offer patients a choice, and that the CCGs are acting lawfully.

"Clinical safety and effectiveness are paramount but, as the legal guardians of finite NHS resources, we commissioners also have a duty to act efficiently, effectively and economically," he writes. "Difficult choices are having to be made about the NHS to ensure safety and sustainability - this is one choice that is morally and ethically clear."
-end-


BMJ

Related Bevacizumab Articles from Brightsurf:

Response to adjuvant bevacizumab among patients with resected melanoma may vary by age
Younger patients with resected melanoma had some benefit from adjuvant treatment with the anti-VEGF therapeutic bevacizumab (Avastin) while older patients with resected melanoma did not.

Researchers identify genetic variants linked to toxic side effects from bevacizumab
In the largest study of its kind, researchers have found two common genetic variants that can be used to predict whether or not cancer patients might suffer severe adverse side-effects, such as high blood pressure, from the drug bevacizumab.

Training the immune system to fight ovarian cancer
A personalized cancer vaccine safely and successfully boosted immune responses and increased survival rates in patients with ovarian cancer, according to results from a pilot clinical trial.

The use of immunotherapy to treat metastatic breast cancer
The Authors review immunotherapy attempts to treat metastatic breast cancer.

New and highly sensitive ELISA technique for bioanalysis of bevacizumab
Bevacizumab is an anti-growth factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, it is the antiangiogenic agent at the most advanced stage of development in the treatment of NSCLC.This drug was selected because of its inter individual differences in clinical response, its therapeutic importance in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Bevacizumab dramatically improves severe hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) associated bleeding
Patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) with severe bleeding, who were treated with intravenous bevacizumab, reported a marked reduction in nose bleeds and gastrointestinal bleeding and were able to stop or considerably reduce blood transfusions, resulting in significantly improved quality of life.

Study shows new second line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer is effective and safe
A randomised trial in 650 patients has confirmed the safety and efficacy of a new second line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, researchers report at the ESMO Asia 2017 Congress.

Cheaper drug could release more than £13.5 million a year within the next 5 years for other services
Doctors in the northeast of England face legal action from two of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies for offering patients with a serious eye condition the choice of a safe, effective but much cheaper drug, reports The BMJ today.

PET/CT helps predict therapy effectiveness in pediatric brain tumors
In this first ever molecular drug-imaging study in children, researchers in The Netherlands used whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans to determine whether bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) in children is likely to be effective.

Immunologic changes point to potential for clinical investigation of combination immunotherapy for deadly kidney cancer
Immunologic changes observed in an early study of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) raised the possibility for a larger clinical study of combination immunotherapy, according to findings reported by researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Read More: Bevacizumab News and Bevacizumab Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.