Nav: Home

Women without insurance more likely to experience delays in receiving follow-up mammograms

November 01, 2016

Bottom Line: Uninsured women under age 65 were more likely than insured women to experience delays between an initial positive screening mammogram and a diagnostic follow-up.

Journal in Which the Study was Published: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

Author: Louise M. Henderson, PhD, an assistant professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and a member of the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Background: About 10 percent of women who undergo screening mammograms are referred for additional follow-up imaging, which could include a diagnostic mammogram, breast ultrasound, MRI, or a breast biopsy, Henderson explained.

Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that women with a positive screening mammogram receive a follow-up diagnostic workup within 60 days of the initial positive screen. Delays in follow-up may contribute to disparities in breast cancer outcomes, as they have been associated with larger tumor size at diagnosis and reduced survival.

How the Study Was Conducted: This study sought to examine the effect of insurance status on the time between the initial screening mammogram and the diagnostic follow-up procedure. Using data from the Carolina Mammography Registry, a North Carolina population-based registry of breast imaging and cancer outcomes, Henderson and colleagues identified women with a positive screening mammogram, and analyzed the receipt of follow-up by insurance status and age group. Among 43,026 women included in the study, 73 percent were under 65 years of age and 27 percent were 65 or older. In the under-65 age group, 89 percent had private insurance, 3 percent were uninsured, and the remainder had a combination of Medicare and private insurance.

Results: The study showed that uninsured women less than 65 years of age experienced a longer time to the start of diagnostic follow-up, and were 59 percent more likely to miss the CDC guideline than privately insured women in the same age group. In this age group, nearly 18 percent of women without insurance received their diagnostic follow-up after 60 days compared with 11 percent of women with private-only insurance. Among women 65 or older, there were no statistically significant delays.

Henderson noted that in many cases, the difference in follow-up time was small. For the overall study population, the median time to follow-up was 12 days. Among women under 65, those with no insurance had a median follow-up time of 16 days, compared with 12 days among women with private-only insurance.

However, she said the median time may mask more significant delays from some women, and noted that approximately 10 percent of women received no follow-up within a year of their initial positive screening mammogram. In women less than 65 years with no insurance, almost 14 percent had no follow-up within the year, compared with 11 percent of women with private- only insurance.

Author Comment: "The women with no insurance are consistently a little bit behind in terms of follow-up, and we need to work toward addressing that gap to ensure better outcomes for these women," Henderson said.

Henderson said that several factors could be responsible for the differences in time between initial positive screening and follow-up diagnostic tests. For example, she noted, women with private insurance may be more economically advantaged, with better access to care.

"If a woman experiences a positive screening mammogram and is called back for a follow-up diagnostic test, it's important that it gets taken care of in a timely fashion," Henderson said. "We want to encourage women to be aware that an abnormal result in a screening mammogram is not necessarily an emergency, but it must be resolved."

Study Limitations: Henderson said a limitation of the study is that insurance status was self-reported and may not be accurate. Also, certain personal factors like anxiety and stress, which have been shown to affect follow-up time, were outside the scope of this study.
-end-
Funding & Disclosures: This study was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health. Henderson declares no conflicts of interest.

To interview Louise M. Henderson, please contact Julia Gunther at julia.gunther@aacr.org or 215-446-6896. For a photo of Henderson, click here. Visit our newsroom.

Follow us: Cancer Research Catalyst http://blog.aacr.org; Twitter @AACR; and Facebook http://www.facebook.com/aacr.org

About the American Association for Cancer Research

Founded in 1907, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the world's first and largest professional organization dedicated to advancing cancer research and its mission to prevent and cure cancer. AACR membership includes more than 37,000 laboratory, translational, and clinical researchers; population scientists; other health care professionals; and patient advocates residing in 108 countries. The AACR marshals the full spectrum of expertise of the cancer community to accelerate progress in the prevention, biology, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer by annually convening more than 30 conferences and educational workshops, the largest of which is the AACR Annual Meeting with almost 19,500 attendees. In addition, the AACR publishes eight prestigious, peer-reviewed scientific journals and a magazine for cancer survivors, patients, and their caregivers. The AACR funds meritorious research directly as well as in cooperation with numerous cancer organizations. As the Scientific Partner of Stand Up To Cancer, the AACR provides expert peer review, grants administration, and scientific oversight of team science and individual investigator grants in cancer research that have the potential for near-term patient benefit. The AACR actively communicates with legislators and other policymakers about the value of cancer research and related biomedical science in saving lives from cancer. For more information about the AACR, visit http://www.AACR.org.

American Association for Cancer Research

Related Uninsured Articles:

Americans sick with Covid disproportionately poor, minorities, uninsured and food insecure
A new study finds that working-age adults who stayed home sick with symptoms of coronavirus in April-May were more likely to be people of color (Black, Hispanic, Asian), low-income, and have less education, compared to adults who remained working or who were absent from work because of non-Covid illness.
18.2 million at increased risk of severe COVID-19 uninsured or underinsured: Harvard study
Harvard researchers found that 18.2 million Americans who are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to age and underlying health conditions were also either uninsured or underinsured.
Uninsured older adults more likely to be sicker and in need of inpatient care in China
A new study, published this week in the International Journal of Health Services, found that older adults without health insurance in China were 35% less likely to receive needed inpatient care compared to those with job-based health insurance.
Thousands of uninsured kidney disease patients strain Texas emergency departments
More than 10,000 uninsured patients sought care at Texas emergency departments for lifesaving kidney dialysis in 2017, incurring more than $21.8 million in hospital costs, according to researchers from UTHealth.
Medicaid expansion slashed uninsured rates in Diabetes Belt, study finds
The Diabetes Belt is a swath of 644 counties across 15 southeastern states that are stricken with high diabetes rates.
Affordable Care Act slashed the uninsured rate among people with diabetes
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) provided health insurance for an estimated 1.9 million people with diabetes, according to a newly published study.
Most independent charity drug assistance programs exclude the uninsured
A new study by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health examined independent charity prescription drug assistance programs in the U.S. and found that nearly all--97 percent--did not provide coverage for uninsured patients.
Many still uninsured after Affordable Care Act Implementation
In community health centers in Medicaid expansion states, among established patients who were uninsured prior to the Affordable Care Act, many remained uninsured after implementation of the Obama-era law.
Are the uninsured and medicaid patients more likely to be transferred to another hospital?
This study analyzed 215,000 emergency department (ED) visits to 160 US hospitals to see if patients with the common conditions of pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma were more likely to be discharged from the ED or transferred to another hospital after being stabilized based on their insurance status.
Emergency department visits by uninsured patients drop in Illinois after Medicaid expansion
Study adds to growing body of evidence suggesting that the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) helped low-income families rely less on emergency department visits for medical care.
More Uninsured News and Uninsured Current Events

Trending Science News

Current Coronavirus (COVID-19) News

Top Science Podcasts

We have hand picked the top science podcasts of 2020.
Now Playing: TED Radio Hour

Warped Reality
False information on the internet makes it harder and harder to know what's true, and the consequences have been devastating. This hour, TED speakers explore ideas around technology and deception. Guests include law professor Danielle Citron, journalist Andrew Marantz, and computer scientist Joy Buolamwini.
Now Playing: Science for the People

#576 Science Communication in Creative Places
When you think of science communication, you might think of TED talks or museum talks or video talks, or... people giving lectures. It's a lot of people talking. But there's more to sci comm than that. This week host Bethany Brookshire talks to three people who have looked at science communication in places you might not expect it. We'll speak with Mauna Dasari, a graduate student at Notre Dame, about making mammals into a March Madness match. We'll talk with Sarah Garner, director of the Pathologists Assistant Program at Tulane University School of Medicine, who takes pathology instruction out of...
Now Playing: Radiolab

What If?
There's plenty of speculation about what Donald Trump might do in the wake of the election. Would he dispute the results if he loses? Would he simply refuse to leave office, or even try to use the military to maintain control? Last summer, Rosa Brooks got together a team of experts and political operatives from both sides of the aisle to ask a slightly different question. Rather than arguing about whether he'd do those things, they dug into what exactly would happen if he did. Part war game part choose your own adventure, Rosa's Transition Integrity Project doesn't give us any predictions, and it isn't a referendum on Trump. Instead, it's a deeply illuminating stress test on our laws, our institutions, and on the commitment to democracy written into the constitution. This episode was reported by Bethel Habte, with help from Tracie Hunte, and produced by Bethel Habte. Jeremy Bloom provided original music. Support Radiolab by becoming a member today at Radiolab.org/donate.     You can read The Transition Integrity Project's report here.