New book asks ethical questions about human subjects research

November 02, 1999

CHAPEL HILL -- For years, conscientious scientists conducting all kinds of research involving human subjects -- from anthropology to public health to clinical medicine -- have bumped up against deep ethical questions about the people they study, says a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill faculty expert.

"Time and time again, researchers are confronted by questions that are not addressed by the rules and regulations that govern research," says Nancy M.P. King, professor of social medicine at the UNC-CH School of Medicine. "These questions arise because research involves relationships -- sometimes long-term relationships -- with the individuals and communities who serve as subjects. Researchers must think about questions like, 'Who sets the focus and the design of the research?' ' Who represents a specific group or community?' and 'Who speaks for them?'"

Those questions and others related to a new way of ethical reasoning regarding human subjects were the focus of a 1995 conference at UNC-CH, "From 'Regs' to Relationships: Re-examining Research Ethics," organized by King, Dr. Gail Henderson, also professor of social medicine, and Dr. Jane Stein, a public health adjunct faculty member.

The five case studies presented during that conference, along with new case material and essays on research ethics, are featured in the first volume of a new University of North Carolina Press series, "Studies in Social Medicine." Edited by the three women, "Beyond Regulations: Ethics in Human Subjects Research" examines new ways to perceive and address moral problems in all human subjects research.

Initially, the conference goal was to address ethical problems that arise when scientists try to apply federal regulations governing human studies in cross-national, cross-cultural settings. But it soon became clear that the focus should be much broader, King says.

"Challenges to traditional moral principles have been sounded across a broad sweep of academic disciplines, echoing a wide variety of intellectual efforts to discern and define new ways of understanding moral issues through consideration of their complex social, cultural and political contexts," the authors write. "These same concerns have caused us to recognize that, in effect, all research is 'cross-cultural.'"

"Beyond Regulations" distills arguments from conference presentations and discussions, including an address by keynote speaker Ruth Macklin. Macklin contends that universal moral truths apply to research with human subjects and that researchers can both achieve their goals and respect subjects by applying those universals alone.

Many conference participants, including the editors, weren't completely satisfied with that viewpoint. The cases, commentaries and essays thus focus on ethical reasoning based not only on application of universal moral principles, but also on close examination of relationships in research and the context in which research takes place. "We (the editors) are not fans of moral relativism, but we think that the notion of an ethics of relationships in research is worth pursuing because it might bring us closer to solving some of the peripheral problems crowding our field of vision," they say.

The new book includes detailed case studies the editors hope will help a wide audience of researchers and students in all fields where research involves human subjects, including social science, medicine, health and the humanities. One case concerned a project examining community and individual perceptions of medical research and HIV/AIDS drug trials. Scholars looked at the Durham black community, young gay men working with the University of California in San Francisco and drug users working with the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

"The reason a project like this is so interesting and so complicated is that it raises questions of trust between potential subject groups and researchers and stigmatization of subjects, depicting the kinds of questions conscientious researchers have to ask themselves about how to work with human subjects," King says.

Another case study tells what happened when an anthropology graduate student began to study a particular Jewish community in Curacao. "The community leaders said to him, 'We want a big say in what you do.' He faced the question of whether and how to change from the familiar model of relationship between powerful researchers and passive subjects and their communities," Henderson says. Questions about relationships between researchers and communities have also arisen in public health and epidemiological research and even in biomedical research.

"Certainly there has been controversial research in North Carolina, where researchers have asked themselves - or should have - questions like, 'Will my research put this community at risk? How should I protect them? What happens after I'm finished?'" King says.

In biomedical research of an "emergency" nature, communities have recently been given a role that is not well understood, Stein says. Regulations allow medical research in emergencies when there isn't time to obtain consent from patient-subjects or their families, as long as the research is preceded by community consultation and is followed by public disclosure. "For this kind of emergency research, how is community defined? And how are we to know when adequate consultation has occurred?" Stein says.

"We are looking at a very practical set of goals: to help researchers respect and work with subjects in the best possible way, to get the data they need and to connect their concerns with a new and different model of moral reasoning," Henderson says.
-end-
Note: King, Henderson and Stein can be reached at (919) 962-1136, 962-1136 and 929-1614, respectively.

Contact: David Williamson, 962-8596.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Related Public Health Articles from Brightsurf:

COVID-19 and the decolonization of Indigenous public health
Indigenous self-determination, leadership and knowledge have helped protect Indigenous communities in Canada during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and these principles should be incorporated into public health in future, argue the authors of a commentary in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) http://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.200852.

Public health consequences of policing homelessness
In a new study examining homelessness, researchers find that policy such a lifestyle has massive public health implications, making sleeping on the street even MORE unhealthy.

Electronic health information exchange improves public health disease reporting
Disease tracking is an important area of focus for health departments in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pandemic likely to cause long-term health problems, Yale School of Public Health finds
The coronavirus pandemic's life-altering effects are likely to result in lasting physical and mental health consequences for many people--particularly those from vulnerable populations--a new study led by the Yale School of Public Health finds.

The Lancet Public Health: US modelling study estimates impact of school closures for COVID-19 on US health-care workforce and associated mortality
US policymakers considering physical distancing measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 face a difficult trade-off between closing schools to reduce transmission and new cases, and potential health-care worker absenteeism due to additional childcare needs that could ultimately increase mortality from COVID-19, according to new modelling research published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

The Lancet Public Health: Access to identification documents reflecting gender identity may improve trans mental health
Results from a survey of over 20,000 American trans adults suggest that having access to identification documents which reflect their identified gender helps to improve their mental health and may reduce suicidal thoughts, according to a study published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

The Lancet Public Health: Study estimates mental health impact of welfare reform, Universal Credit, in Great Britain
The 2013 Universal Credit welfare reform appears to have led to an increase in the prevalence of psychological distress among unemployed recipients, according to a nationally representative study following more than 52,000 working-age individuals from England, Wales, and Scotland over nine years between 2009-2018, published as part of an issue of The Lancet Public Health journal on income and health.

BU researchers: Pornography is not a 'public health crisis'
Researchers from the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) have written an editorial in the American Journal of Public Health special February issue arguing against the claim that pornography is a public health crisis, and explaining why such a claim actually endangers the health of the public.

The Lancet Public Health: Ageism linked to poorer health in older people in England
Ageism may be linked with poorer health in older people in England, according to an observational study of over 7,500 people aged over 50 published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

Study: Public transportation use linked to better public health
Promoting robust public transportation systems may come with a bonus for public health -- lower obesity rates.

Read More: Public Health News and Public Health Current Events
Brightsurf.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.